Amida Brimah | The Boneyard

Amida Brimah

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,345
Reaction Score
23,550
I know the kid has been discussed ad nauseam on this board, but having watched teams like Kentucky, Kansas, Duke, and Oklahoma State seemingly score at will over the last week or two, I've came to a conclusion: with the new rules making it exceedingly difficult to defend the perimeter, the only way to negate increased penetration is with shot blocking. This UConn team, as currently constructed, is going to win a ton of games (I'm thinking potentially 30 or more) simply as a product of brilliance at the point guard position, good coaching, and upper-echelon floor spacing. There are only a couple teams on our schedule (Memphis and Louisville might be the only two now that Hill is out for Florida) that can match our quickness at the guard position. Everybody else is going to discover pretty quickly that our guards - particularly Shabazz - can make a play when ever they want, and that their inability to keep them out of the paint is going to place them in the precarious position of simply hoping we miss the high percentage shots our offense generates. This UConn team isn't a complete juggernaut - they're going to lose games this season, but when they do, it's likely that we'll be able to attribute it to a poor shooting night (or a demolition on the boards) and not the other team shutting us down.

Like it or not, assuming the officials stay true to the groundwork they've laid early in the season, college basketball is going to become a finesse game that's even more conducive to guard play and athleticism than it already was. You can't guard people with your hands anymore, you can't steer drivers away from the hoop, and you can't fight through screens as vigorously. Perimeter defense hasn't been de-emphasized, the degree of difficulty has just skyrocketed.

This brings me to conclusion number two: the rate at which Brimah develops is going to determine whether this is a very good season or a great one. If he improves incrementally from what he is now (an energetic center who can make an overwhelmingly positive impact in a short period of time, but whose deficiencies may cost you over the course of an entire game), this will still be one of the most ascetically pleasing teams UConn has ever had, and one that can make a run in the tournament if they get hot. Even in a short sample of four games, Brimah has proven to be one of the best shot blockers in the country. For further context, his block rate is an absurd 23.7%, which means he blocks 23.7% of the two point field goals opposing players attempt when he is on the court. Additionally, he's blocking 12.4 shots per 40 minutes, which is also pretty good. Now obviously, these numbers are not sustainable. Anthony Davis, one of the best shot blockers in recent memory, posted a block rate of 13.7% and blocked 5.9 shots per 40 minutes in his days at Kentucky. But even if Brimah isn't quite as proficient blocking shots as early statistics may suggest, I'm comfortable in declaring him somebody with game-changing shot blocking ability, which is more than I thought I'd be able to say before the season.

The question, then, becomes, "Well if Brimah is such a formidable shot blocker, and our offense is so efficient, why can't we win a championship"? The first problem is Brimah's inability to stay on the floor. Through four games, he's fouling at an obscene rate, committing 9.1 fouls per 40 minutes. Some of this is probably unavoidable, since Amida is placed in situation where he is forced to foul simply by virtue of conceding 20+ pounds of muscle to some of his opponents. A lot of his fouls, though, have been of the avoidable variety. Whether he's being victimized by a pump fake, mis-timing his motion by a split-second, or just taking an unnecessary risk to try to make a play, he's racked up quite a few fouls that he'll learn to avoid over time. You can't anchor an elite defense if you're not on the floor.

The second ailment is one even the biggest nitwits on this board have been able to diagnose: rebounding. For as energetic and long as Brimah is, he's frequently pushed out of position underneath by more physically mature players, and even when he is positioned correctly, he's a bit behind the curve from an instinctual and timing standpoint, which isn't surprising when you consider he's only been playing a few years. Regardless of cause, Brimah's rebound rate of 7.1% leaves much to be desired (Tyler Olander's rebound rate last season was 10.2% and we were greatly unsatisfied with that mark). As I've spoken about at great length before, it's difficult to play small (and this is a small team, at least by UConn standards) when you do not have a competent rebounder at the center position. Plain and simple, it's exceptionally rare for a team to have an elite defense if they cannot rebound at a respectable rate. Now, as I've conceded, we're dealing with a small sample size here, and, especially early in the season, a lot of the opponents we've been playing have been mid-majors content to jack up long three's (which produce long rebounds).

So, to recap, in a way, Brimah's assets (shot blocking, and I haven't even talked about his offense, which has been fine) and his deficiencies (rebounding, post defense against certain opponents) cancel each other out in some respect. We're not getting the rebounds, but at least we're blocking a lot of those rebounds, thanks in large part to our newest center on both accounts. The strides Amida makes in all facets of his game - but most importantly, rebounding - will define the ceiling for this year's team. In my preseason preview, I said this team could not win a championship, and I said that because even though I felt our front court would improve substantially, there were limitations that would prevent this team from evolving into an elite defense. Amida Brimah, though? He's the guy that could change all that. If he can improve on the glass to at least an Okwandu level rebounder, eliminate about half of the fouls he's currently committing, and continue to understand and study the sport he just discovered a few years ago at an abnormal level, there's really no sense in putting a ceiling on this group.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,621
Reaction Score
97,024
Good post champs........

While on the subject of one Mr Brimah I have a question from the game the other night regarding blocked shots. To me he had 2 but should have had 3 and here's why. I don't know who remembers but I believe in the 1st half the big guy, Morris ?, went to the hole down on the right low block, couple dribbles and while dribbling someone reached in and he was fouled but continued to shoot in which Brimah blocked his shot silly. I thought the play should have been whistled dead but instead they used the continuation call and he was awarded 2 shots. Therefore the blocked shot SHOULD count as 1 because he made sure the player did not get an "and 1" correct? Yet they only have him for 2 blocks........

Am I wrong in assuming they blew that one?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,129
Reaction Score
7,592
Brimah may take the season to adjust to Div. 1 basketball and learn to stay out of foul trouble. As everyone has said, rebounding will be the issue for us because we will have to continue to shoot at a very high percentage to beat good teams. Shooting efficiency will help a lot.This season we aren't going to win any rebounding battles but if we can cut the deficit some we could go a long way.
Brimah has been a pleasant surprise. I expected him to be much more raw than he is based upon reports. His enthusiasm and effort makes him a fun player to watch and he will only get better. It would be nice to have a fat ass Barkley type big but we'll be fine with what we have.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
857
Reaction Score
854
Good post champs........

While on the subject of one Mr Brimah I have a question from the game the other night regarding blocked shots. To me he had 2 but should have had 3 and here's why. I don't know who remembers but I believe in the 1st half the big guy, Morris ?, went to the hole down on the right low block, couple dribbles and while dribbling someone reached in and he was fouled but continued to shoot in which Brimah blocked his shot silly. I thought the play should have been whistled dead but instead they used the continuation call and he was awarded 2 shots. Therefore the blocked shot SHOULD count as 1 because he made sure the player did not get an "and 1" correct? Yet they only have him for 2 blocks........

Am I wrong in assuming they blew that one?

What?

Shooting fouls don't count as shots for the player if he doesn't score, so how can it be blocked?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
894
Reaction Score
2,379
I think from what I've seen; the rebounding is marginally than last season. What concerns me is the application of the new rules in the post.
Again this is really a small sample size, but it seems as if the offensive player has even more latitude. UConn's bigs (with the exception of Olander) lack experience. They are punished for that even more than for being reedy.

You can do virtually nothing to impede an offensive player in the low post. He goes bump, bump, bump, and as soon as he is in a shooting motion any contact vertical, schmertical is a foul. Fortunately, most teams don't have well developed low post games.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,621
Reaction Score
97,024
What?

Shooting fouls don't count as shots for the player if he doesn't score, so how can it be blocked?

If he shot the ball because it's a "shooting foul" it would count if goes in right??? Then if it is stopped from going in then why doesn't the blocked shot count - it was the reason it had no chance to go in correct?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,621
Reaction Score
97,024
I think from what I've seen; the rebounding is marginally than last season. What concerns me is the application of the new rules in the post.
Again this is really a small sample size, but it seems as if the offensive player has even more latitude. UConn's bigs (with the exception of Olander) lack experience. They are punished for that even more than for being reedy.

You can do virtually nothing to impede an offensive player in the low post. He goes bump, bump, bump, and as soon as he is in a shooting motion any contact vertical, schmertical is a foul. Fortunately, most teams don't have well developed low post games.

Brimah's 2nd foul was exactly that zy and it's ridiculous. if the offensive guy is banging to get in you need to impede his progress with a body and some officials are going to react wrong to this defensive play and make a bad call. Hence #2 on Amidah the other night - awful call!
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
42
Reaction Score
64
30 games is a tall order. I would be ecstatic if this team won 30 games. That's like a final four year. We'll see.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
9,052
Reaction Score
35,731
If he shot the ball because it's a "shooting foul" it would count if goes in right??? Then if it is stopped from going in then why doesn't the blocked shot count - it was the reason it had no chance to go in correct?

In this case as the previous poster said, if the shot goes in, the player gets 1 FG and 1 FGA. If the shot does not go in for whatever reason, it does not count as a missed field goal. So technically there's only a shot if it goes in, which makes it impossible for there to be a block.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
10,700
Reaction Score
12,063
Brimah has a tremendous upside, I believe we'll see who he really is next year when we'll need him a lot more. If he does what he needs to in the off season, he has lottery pick written all over him.

Don't know how this kid flew so far under the radar, an unbelievable find.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,621
Reaction Score
97,024
In this case as the previous poster said, if the shot goes in, the player gets 1 FG and 1 FGA. If the shot does not go in for whatever reason, it does not count as a missed field goal. So technically there's only a shot if it goes in, which makes it impossible for there to be a block.

okay good this makes sense! kinda.....again I knew the ultimate answer but honestly if it can't go in because of a block then it should be a block.........but how can you block a shot that is not a shot? LOL.........have fun with that huh? :confused:
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,899
Reaction Score
10,484
With all the doomed talk about rebounding , rim protection is even more important, can't really teach it either. by mid year , with all it's emphasis , rebounding will become second nature to the bigs. love what brimahs bringing to the table, just needs to grow each game
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,051
Reaction Score
19,075
okay good this makes sense! kinda.....again I knew the ultimate answer but honestly if it can't go in because of a block then it should be a block.........but how can you block a shot that is not a shot? LOL.........have fun with that huh? :confused:

Statistically, it makes sense since the shooter isn't punished for drawing a foul by getting charged with a miss. So there's no official shot to block.
Philosophically, it makes sense since a foul typically prevents the shooter from taking his normal shot - odds are he had to double clutch or absorb contact first, so the defense shouldn't benefit from a violation. Same way you don't get an INT or a pass breakup if a teammate is flagged for interference. The play doesn't count.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
462
Reaction Score
258
I know the kid has been discussed ad nauseam on this board..
Ad nauseam is a Latin term for something unpleasurable that has continued "to [the point of] nausea".[1][2] For example, the sentence, "This topic has been discussed ad nauseam," signifies that the topic in question has been discussed extensively, and that those involved in the discussion have grown tired of it.

- I, along with others have not grown tired of The Brimah and talking about him is not unpleasurable.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,129
Reaction Score
7,592
Ad nauseam is a Latin term for something unpleasurable that has continued "to [the point of] nausea".[1][2] For example, the sentence, "This topic has been discussed ad nauseam," signifies that the topic in question has been discussed extensively, and that those involved in the discussion have grown tired of it.

- I, along with others have not grown tired of The Brimah and talking about him is not unpleasurable.
But you weren't too tired to open the thread titled :"Brimah" even though you knew it would be unpleasurable for you. If you don't like the subject don't open the thread. Obviously some haven't grown tired of it. If you have, move on.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,087
Reaction Score
42,323
But you weren't too tired to open the thread titled :"Brimah" even though you knew it would be unpleasurable for you. If you don't like the subject don't open the thread. Obviously some haven't grown tired of it. If you have, move on.
You misread what he wrote. He stated he wasn't tired of the subject.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,466
Reaction Score
14,552
" the rate at which Brimah develops is going to determine whether this is a very good season or a great one."

Could not agree more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
442
Guests online
2,370
Total visitors
2,812

Forum statistics

Threads
157,168
Messages
4,086,338
Members
9,981
Latest member
CJasmer


Top Bottom