lmao what? The Sun Belt isn't poaching AAC teams. Give me a break. Where do you people come up with this stuff?Question is whether AAC can hang on or whether MW and SB succeed in dividing up the only good teams left.
If Memphis and SMU bolt, AAC dead.
That's only an issue if they both win their divisions, at which point they can decide how they want to handle it. The reason it won't work is that Army is dead set against joining a conference again, but if they did (and honestly, they should), you could make it work with Army and Navy in different divisions and just never have them play each other in conference play.Logistically, Army and Navy can't be in the same conference, if that conference is one that has a championship game. Reason being that the Army-Navy is a STANDALONE national game that takes place the week after Championship Week. It is the lone college football game on that Saturday and is followed by the Heisman ceremony.
Serious question… how much do you think ESPN is really going to make without the 3 best football & basketball programs? The only “National” brand left (and it’s a mile long stretch to call them that) is Memphis. Once the penny experiment is over there, that program too loses its luster.The AAC will survive because ESPN will want them to survive as ESPN likely makes a very nice profit off the AAC..
There are actually a number of quality southeastern football programs that can be added.
AAC basketball is in the toilet and will stay there.
It's already dead.I respectfully believe that a number of you guys are way off base with regards to the future of the AAC. While it's never going to be a P5/P6/P Whatever conference, it's not dying. They actually have a number of solid options to fill the open spots, to include:
1) Charlotte -- obvious choice IMO due to media market and rising program
2) UAB -- the program redux seems to be on an upward trajectory. A footprint in the state with the most HS talent per capita can't be a bad thing for the league. Also a school with solid basketball history.
3) Rice -- brand-name Ivy-level academic school. Relationships with SMU, Tulane, Navy and Tulsa. Obvious fit and keeps Houston presence.
4) Georgia State -- Not much there as far as football tradition, but adding the Atlanta school makes sense. Too much potential to ignore and GSU has gone from CAA laughingstock to a lower-level bowl team fairly quickly.
5) Air Force as a football affiliate only -- less likely but worth a thought. They could play their other sports in Summit or Big Sky.
6) Marshall -- Excellent tradition, rabidly supportive fan base, great football. Their audition in Annapolis yesterday went very well.
7) Old Dominion -- has stunk at football since moving up from FBS but Norfolk/Va Beach market could be strategic, especially for recruiting. Also a great hoops program to add on to the league.
8) Buffalo -- likely the biggest stretch, but if the league wanted another eastern team to supplement Temple and Navy, Buffalo has been strong in both football and basketball lately.
By my count, AAC has 4 spots open to get back to 12, replacing UCONN, Houston, UCF and Cincinnati. My picks for expansion would be the following: Charlotte, UAB, Rice, Marshall
This. If you go look up the viewership for the teams left they are putrid. I wonder if there is a clause in the contract for ESPN to renegotiate if teams leave?Serious question… how much do you think ESPN is really going to make without the 3 best football & basketball programs? The only “National” brand left (and it’s a mile long stretch to call them that) is Memphis. Once the penny experiment is over there, that program too loses its luster.
seems like for ESPN the aac is more about filling required air time slots with 9PM Tuesday night games on ESPNnews than actually “profiting” from the content.
I believe there is if certain teams left. Houston and Cincy were two of them.This. If you go look up the viewership for the teams left they are putrid. I wonder if there is a clause in the contract for ESPN to renegotiate if teams leave?
Shocking idea actually..........There is absolutely no justification in adding Wichita State into the Big East. Why would anyone think that's a good idea?
Its like you read my mind.Who cares?
If it dies, it dies.
Memphis wont be there for long and the AAC problably wont exist in 5 years if not sooner.So all these five stars going to Memphis will be like "Coach Penny, we're playing who?"
And hopefully that pipeline drys up quickly.
The same point as adding Dayton. It’s bringing in a very good, basketball-only school to even out the conference to two, regionally balanced, six-team divisions.There is absolutely no justification in adding Wichita State into the Big East. Why would anyone think that's a good idea?
Best option suggested on this thread.The best 12th team to add to the Big East is St. Louis. Join the west division, Catholic school, big media market, 12,000 seat packed arena, recently a top 25 program.
Serious 2 part question for you, because I will respect your answer. Why do you feel that the BE needs to add a team? What type of change to conference scheduling, 22 games or less?Best option suggested on this thread.
Plus, their fans don't have the same negative reputation as Wichita State. Physical brand of basketball that fits our conference quite well.
Memphis wont be there for long and the AAC problably wont exist in 5 years if not sooner.
The only non power conference team you add to the Big East is Gonzaga. Everyone else is filler and adds nothing from a revenue and competition standpoint.
It is time for Gonzaga to join. The expected departure of BYU from the WCC to the Big 12 helps in this regard. That conference just got weaker.
#DaggerTreyTy
#GonzagaToBigEast
Where are they going to go?