"Always foul up three!" | The Boneyard

"Always foul up three!"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,257
Reaction Score
133,340
Note that it might have just cost Maryland a win...

Now in OT after UVa missed a free throw on purpose and then scored on a beautiful inbounds play.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,149
Reaction Score
8,314
I've always thought intentionally fouling up 3 was a bad idea. JC never did it.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,488
Reaction Score
37,270
Just because it fails one time doesn't make it a bad strategy. You have to consider the probabilities.

Which is more likely?
1) A guy hits a contested 3 (say 15% -- 2 or 3 times harder than making a 3 normally)
2) A guy makes one free throw (75%), misses the second (95%), his team gets the offensive rebound (30%), and makes a basket (or gets fouled and hits two free throws) (50%)

#1 has a 15% chance
#2 has a ~10% chance

If those percentages are correct, it means fouling is the right strategy every time, even though it will fail some of the time.
 

RoderickSpode

7th Earl of Sidcup
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
646
Reaction Score
3,072
You also have to consider, however, that generally the worst case scenario in #1 is overtime, while #2 stops the clock, gives your opponent the ball directly in front of the basket, and allows any number of crazy situations to play out, including you losing in regulation.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
1,455
Reaction Score
2,830
You cant live and die by any rule when up by three in the closing seconds. Too many dynamics involved getting the inlet pass to your own guy and the seconds left on the clock. It makes sense on paper (I think) but how many flipping turnovers can occur on an inlet pass when under pressure? The defense, after making free throws, has a great chance to set up for the inlet.
JC liked to let the game unfold and had confidence in his D to lock down from out of the perimeter. He would never GIVE anyone points. I'd say it worked out okay for him.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,382
Reaction Score
23,714
Just because it fails one time doesn't make it a bad strategy. You have to consider the probabilities.

Which is more likely?
1) A guy hits a contested 3 (say 15% -- 2 or 3 times harder than making a 3 normally)
2) A guy makes one free throw (75%), misses the second (95%), his team gets the offensive rebound (30%), and makes a basket (or gets fouled and hits two free throws) (50%)

#1 has a 15% chance
#2 has a ~10% chance

If those percentages are correct, it means fouling is the right strategy every time, even though it will fail some of the time.

One other possibility is that you foul the three point shooter. This seems to happen a lot.

The strategy, in my mind, definitely depends on how much time is remaining. If there is 15 seconds, I think it's a bad idea, because then you open yourself up to the possibility of losing in regulation if you miss free throws. But with five seconds left, the other team needs a crazy sequence of events to unfold, and even then, overtime is probably worst case scenario.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
98
Guests online
2,100
Total visitors
2,198

Forum statistics

Threads
160,157
Messages
4,219,236
Members
10,082
Latest member
Basingstoke


.
Top Bottom