But they've beaten us three straight now in three different arenas. So anyone would have to conclude they are the better team right now or they at least seem to have our number.I don't agree Phil. They were just better last night. Period.
If hope does not spring eternal, fans and players should put on their jammies and turn out the lights. The essence of sport is competition, a condition and chance that renews itself the next game.
Definitely disagree. We are the 3rd -4th best team in the country and as long as we remain a #1 seed the FF is probable in the NCAA's. Then who knows, upsets happen; look at the men from last year.Geno was right. We are a top 10 team this year with only a slight chance of making the final four. I didn't see much good about the way we played against ND.
But they've beaten us three straight now in three different arenas. So anyone would have to conclude they are the better team right now or they at least seem to have our number.
That's not to say that we can't turn it around during the tourneys though like they did last year.
I agree that they've beaten us three straight times but I think we GAVE them the game earlier this year at Notre Dame. We had the game in hand at the end and made a couple of bonehead plays that had nothing to do with Notre Dame and a horrible officiating miscue when Skylar Duggins hammered a Huskie in the waning moments and was credited with a steal that gave Notre Dame the chance to get into overtime. Yesterday I was very impressed with Notre Dame, at least what I saw of the last ten minutes of the game. UConn floundered and Notre Dame looked sharp and focused and clearly the better team, at least in the latter part of the game.But they've beaten us three straight now in three different arenas. So anyone would have to conclude they are the better team right now or they at least seem to have our number.
That's not to say that we can't turn it around during the tourneys though like they did last year.
Yes. Last year we were the better team, BUT they still beat us one game. We can certainly do the same.So...they are a better team unless we beat them, which we could...allllrighty
The one thing I didn't get (from a fan's perspective, so I don't know exactly what they didn't do that Geno was instructing them to do) was that the lack of defensive rebounding was what I saw as a constant problem, even with ND's excellent ball movement and good shooting. So I wondered why he didn't go more often to a 2 post lineup to get Kiah into the game with a fairly limited responsibility on D, and a primary role to box out on the weak side where we were getting murdered. Maybe it would have been risky with regard to who she guards, but it might have shored up the big issue. Anyway, ND looked the better team on both sides of the ball.
I thought he said Kiah was not prepared to play at this level. Also think that Kiah might be one of those players that don't listen to the coaches. My guess it is a freshman's inability to focus rather than a deliberate act not to listen.
Where in might have been the problem.From what I saw, she may not have gotten to touch the ball while she was in the game.
Aha, now I know why we lost. The feakin coaches.Those lucky untalented IrishWow! Kiah had maybe 6 minutes PT and you post such a negative comment?
How many turnovers did Kiah make?
From what I saw, she may not have gotten to touch the ball while she was in the game.
We were out-played on the court and we were out-coached on the sidelines.
Peace,
John Fryer
My post had to do with her role on D and rebounding, not how many touches she had. If Kelly isn't boxing out and defending, she isn't a great help to the team, as in, she doesn't score. Given that 2 and 1/2 players scored yesterday, it couldn't have hurt too much for Kiah - or Heather - to come in with a very limited assignment related to shoring up the rebounding problem, who knows.Where in might have been the problem.
While you are under there, please change the muffler.I feel like I am under the bus already.
BINGO... I wish I could've said it this wellMy post had to do with her role on D and rebounding, not how many touches she had. If Kelly isn't boxing out and defending, she isn't a great help to the team, as in, she doesn't score. Given that 2 and 1/2 players scored yesterday, it couldn't have hurt too much for Kiah - or Heather - to come in with a very limited assignment related to shoring up the rebounding problem, who knows.
I know the drill, GA knows more about what's going on than us outsiders ever will, and he's won 7 NCs while I haven't even won 2 bucks in the lottery (although I did coach my son's rec league team to a brilliant 1 point loss to the best team in the league when the regular coach went home sick). But coaches can get stubborn, as in Heather didn't play a second vs. ND last year in the NCAA when the team was gassed. And, by the way, SD was pretty gassed last night, forgetting whether Kiah could have spent more time on the floor with SD as well. Obviously ND was the better team, and even if Kiah comes in and plays all world we still might lose. But Kelis Fisher wasn't even playing all-Kelis Fisher last night, so maybe another option could have been tried.
or it can all backfire and they tighten up even more and play scared (dont want to make mistakes)Here's how I see the big picture: In the scheme of things for this season, the ND game had no real importance. No way to win the Big East. Thus it was the perfect time for Geno to use a game that appeared to be important as a tool to get the team ready for what is important, the tourneys to come.
Fear is a great motivator. To perform on the court, a team needs to fear the coach more than it fears the opposition. I think that's where GA is trying to put the team psychologically with all of the public criticism.
That was kinda my point in responding to Fryer about Kiah not touching the ball. If she was sent in there to get some rebounds, she didn't. Granted she wasn't given much time, but I think sometimes (usually), Geno or the staff can tell if they are going to get anything out of a player or not in a couple trips up and down the floor.Actually, Kiah did have an opportunity to shore up the rebounding problem and she was pretty ineffective. She played passively both in the 1st half and in limited minutes in the 2nd half.
That was kinda my point in responding to Fryer about Kiah not touching the ball. If she was sent in there to get some rebounds, she didn't. Granted she wasn't given much time, but I think sometimes (usually), Geno or the staff can tell if they are going to get anything out of a player or not in a couple trips up and down the floor.
Exactly why she ended up on the pine.Yeah, I went back and watch parts of the game and focused on Kiah. She had opportunities to go after the ball and didn't. She had opportunities to defend better and harder and didn't. She looked a little lost. And you're right, the coaches can tell and last night's game wasn't one to let her play her way out of it.
Wish they could have, but the team needed support immediately., the coaches can tell and last night's game wasn't one to let her play her way out of it.
And fill up the tank.While you are under there, please change the muffler.
Yeah, I went back and watch parts of the game and focused on Kiah. She had opportunities to go after the ball and didn't. She had opportunities to defend better and harder and didn't. She looked a little lost. And you're right, the coaches can tell and last night's game wasn't one to let her play her way out of it.
I don't see any players being slammed.Why is it that some players are almost always given a pass while other players get slamed?