All will be confirmed in six hours. Before this thread loses all its steam, may I ask for explanations of terms used here? Asked because I watch the same thing everyone else does and see things somewhat differently, and would like to get a picture of other points of view:
1. Volume shooting? What's the criteria/ guidelines? How has Diamond DeShields earned that distinction? Any other player?
2. Undisciplined? Again, what is the criteria/guidelines? How has North Carolina earned that distinction? Why does it bother some fans when teams play "undisciplined" basketball? Why can't such a style be successful? Has it ever been successful?
3. What has Coach Sylvia Hatchell done/not done to earn the distinction of being a bad coach? How does her record not speak for itself?
4. How is it possible to disparage a coach for "only" winning one national championship with certain highly talented players on the roster?
5. What is being referred to when it is said a team lacks fundamentals?
6. What is so appalling about men's basketball that the mere thought of it seeping into the women's game has many on edge?
7. What is meant when someone says that "he/she plays the game the way it is supposed to be played?"
I believe that all styles of basketball can be successful with the right personnel, but have always favored the wide open uptempo styles of UNLV, Oral Roberts(for those old enough to remember when they had great teams), and Loyola Marymount among others. It was entertaining as opposed to the walk it up the floor styles of Lou Carnesecca's St. John's teams or Al McGuire's Marquette teams, but I rooted for St. John's and Marquette just the same.