I meant freshman Okafor would start over sophomore Sanogo. Okafor never acquired Sanogo's footwork or low post moves. Even at the NBA level. Okafor was always a dominant rebounder. I mean among conference leaders, even as a frosh. Defensively he was a serious problem for other teams. The most defensive impact of any UConn player. See how different they are?
I can read just fine, I just disagree.
Despite apparently having "never acquired Sanogo's footwook or low post moves", Okafor averaged more points on greater efficiency than Sanogo when both were sophomores. Okafor didn't just dunk the ball, but somehow shot 4% better than Sanogo. Also, offense involves rebounding, and he rebounded more offensive misses than Sanogo did...
So, I think it is at least debatable that Sanogo was a better
offensive player, and, even if Okafor wasn't an amazing defender, I'd take him on the offensive side over Sanogo, in part because he was more efficient and in part because he achieved that offensive efficiency against better teams and in higher stakes.