BC is just as likely to drop baseball as it is to support it fully given the travel. Their coaching staff just recently scattered to the seven winds.
BC is just as likely to drop baseball as it is to support it fully given the travel. Their coaching staff just recently scattered to the seven winds.
The idea that that is an overall reduction in travel seems illogical. It takes two to tango. Going to Cal or Stanford is enticing for any top notch non-revenue athlete, but this change is not a plus in any way but for the school’s bottom line. It reeks for the student-athlete - and they are the majority at these schools.Apparently Olympic sports with be hosted out of SMU as home games for Cal and Stanford to reduce travel expenditures. With east coast teams only having to travel out west once per year. The remaining games all taking place at SMU.
Kind of silly from Cal and Stamford's perspective to host home games in Dallas.
The ACC looks like a bunch of clowns.
He's talking about the hiring and firing decisions, ie. doing things on the cheap.You cannot look at the facility that was built when our on field product didn't even remotely deserve a facility that nice and tell me our administration doesn't take football seriously
If I were a BC baseball player, I’d be thrilled to play in Berkeley or Palo Alto. Two of the most beautiful campuses in the country, with great facilities, the weather sure beats New England’s in April, and Stanford is consistently one of the country’s top programs.
I think we UConn fans (class of ‘74 here) underestimate the value college presidents of prestigious schools put on academic reputation in conference alignment. The ACC is not the Big 12 and does not want to be. Stanford and Cal add significant academic prestige to Duke, UNC, UVA, Wake, Georgia Tech, ND (all but football) and (yes) BC and Syracuse.
SMU is the academic outlier, but as I’ve said in a previous post……they are all about Dallas eyeballs.
Meh, I think everyone thought of Randy as an interim hire to get us back to competency. It didn't work out that way, but I think that was the idea.If The Board really made him rehire Edsall, they should stay out of all FB decisions going forward. I only blame Benedict for not getting rid of him after year 2. Zero upside to keeping him.
Stuck with him way too long. Dude didn't look like he was even tryingMeh, I think everyone thought of Randy as an interim hire to get us back to competency. It didn't work out that way, but I think that was the idea.
You have two of the finest academic institutions in the world located in one of the best locations in the United States. And now you want to tell your student-athletes they will be playing home games in Dallas. I guess it would help recruit kids from the Dallas area but this is beyond silly.Apparently Olympic sports with be hosted out of SMU as home games for Cal and Stanford to reduce travel expenditures. With east coast teams only having to travel out west once per year. The remaining games all taking place at SMU.
Kind of silly from Cal and Stamford's perspective to host home games in Dallas.
The ACC looks like a bunch of clowns.
I know - it makes one suspicious that they are making this up as they go along without thought for unintended consequencesYou have two of the finest academic institutions in the world located in one of the best locations in the United States. And now you want to tell your student-athletes they will be playing home games in Dallas. I guess it would help recruit kids from the Dallas area but this is beyond silly.
It'll never happenThe ACC seems so desperate.... I wonder if they will will next tear a page out of the Big East playbook and kick BC out of their conference in order to upgrade revenues and further insulate themselves between now and 2036. Humor me - it might be wishful thinking but UConn would certainly be an upgrade and how sweet would that be to elevate while BC gets kicked to the curb. What revenue number would UConn accept, given what CalfordSMU just accepted?? Say, it's ~8m or less, that would generate another net 20m+ to share across the incumbent schools. Perhaps a far fetched scenario but it feels like given what happened this week, it's not totally crazy.
Probably not, but it would be a smart move by the ACC and I'm sure deep down in their heart of hearts they realize it.It'll never happen
San Francisco to Dallas is a long trip, and it's their home game. It doesn't help them at all.The plan I've heard about SMU hosted conferences games would be used so Cal/Stanford don't have to go cross country fives times for say soccer. So you replace a midweek road trip for them & existing members would lose 1 true home match but that would be rotated so it might only happen 1 every 4 years
Just how many people from Dallas or elsewhere in Texas are going to care about the ACC and show up at the games? They would show up in force for the B12 or SEC, especially if there is a home team there. Good luck with that ACC officials!You have two of the finest academic institutions in the world located in one of the best locations in the United States. And now you want to tell your student-athletes they will be playing home games in Dallas. I guess it would help recruit kids from the Dallas area but this is beyond silly.
They're not losing a home game, UNC for example would lose 1 soccer match(M&W) against Cal/Stanford & they trade a 5 hr flight for a 3.5 hour oneSan Francisco to Dallas is a long trip, and it's their home game. It doesn't help them at all.
People showed up in Connecticut for an NC State ACC game. They aren't some rival or anything that people in Connecticut care about. If we opened with Charlotte, I doubt the place would have been as packed.Just how many people from Dallas or elsewhere in Texas are going to care about the ACC and show up at the games? They would show up in force for the B12 or SEC, especially if there is a home team there. Good luck with that ACC officials!
BC and Rutgers were incredibly lucky. Neither should be where they are.The ACC seems so desperate.... I wonder if they will will next tear a page out of the Big East playbook and kick BC out of their conference in order to upgrade revenues and further insulate themselves between now and 2036. Humor me - it might be wishful thinking but UConn would certainly be an upgrade and how sweet would that be to elevate while BC gets kicked to the curb. What revenue number would UConn accept, given what CalfordSMU just accepted?? Say, it's ~8m or less, that would generate another net 20m+ to share across the incumbent schools. Perhaps a far fetched scenario but it feels like given what happened this week, it's not totally crazy.
If I were a BC baseball player, I’d be thrilled to play in Berkeley or Palo Alto. Two of the most beautiful campuses in the country, with great facilities, the weather sure beats New England’s in April, and Stanford is consistently one of the country’s top programs.
I think we UConn fans (class of ‘74 here) underestimate the value college presidents of prestigious schools put on academic reputation in conference alignment. The ACC is not the Big 12 and does not want to be. Stanford and Cal add significant academic prestige to Duke, UNC, UVA, Wake, Georgia Tech, ND (all but football) and (yes) BC and Syracuse.
SMU is the academic outlier, but as I’ve said in a previous post……they are all about Dallas eyeballs.
San Francisco to Dallas is a long trip, and it's their home game. It doesn't help them at all.
ACC expansion sets the bottom for conference expansion going forward. Going forward, teams will whore themselves to get into specific conferences or groups just to get in. It will get really ugly like corporate M&As etc with deals like the SMU just did. It is a reflection of the overall deteriorating American culture where everything is for profit, and the winner takes all with losers be damned.
I am sick of these conferences and media networks acting like Mafia dons that decide who is in and who is out in the most cutthroat way possible. These conferences have way too much control over college football, and it should not be this way.
I can't wait for the day every school is paid for its worth vs. sponging off the conference with schools like RU and BCU. The ND indy in football with regional sports in a conference is the model for the future. UCONN in some ways is already there with our current model. If ND can get a huge streaming plus linear deal for football, I think it will set the precedent for other big programs that might follow. Once teams like Alabama and Ohio State bail on the conferences, it will be a totally new world where every school will be paid based on their own media deal vs. as a member of the conference.
How to be able to afford college football at a high-level without conference affiliation into easy steps:ACC expansion sets the bottom for conference expansion going forward. Going forward, teams will whore themselves to get into specific conferences or groups just to get in. It will get really ugly like corporate M&As etc with deals like the SMU just did. It is a reflection of the overall deteriorating American culture where everything is for profit, and the winner takes all with losers be damned.
I am sick of these conferences and media networks acting like Mafia dons that decide who is in and who is out in the most cutthroat way possible. These conferences have way too much control over college football, and it should not be this way.
I can't wait for the day every school is paid for its worth vs. sponging off the conference with schools like RU and BCU. The ND indy in football with regional sports in a conference is the model for the future. UCONN in some ways is already there with our current model. If ND can get a huge streaming plus linear deal for football, I think it will set the precedent for other big programs that might follow. Once teams like Alabama and Ohio State bail on the conferences, it will be a totally new world where every school will be paid based on their own media deal vs. as a member of the conference.
I think alums of these schools will demand football be played because that's what they are used to for the last 100 years. They will threaten schools with no donation etc just to force the school to play football. Schools will oblige because big schools will pay for body bag games etc. just to fill the schedule with Ws.I agree with this.
We have positioned ourselves to sink or swim. We don't have a conference to hide our blemishes. The better football looks, the better it will look.
The problem is that once these other schools get paid what they are worth, they will drop the sport altogether.
We should pay close attention to the next ND media deal. I really think it is the new frontier if ND can land a deal that will surpass the highest conference payout. Conferences like SEC and B1G will demand media companies to pay each school like the ND deal, and media companies will refuse. All it takes is media and streaming companies make one side deal with FSU or Ohio State to get a similar media deal like ND on the open market to get the floodgate open.How to be able to afford college football at a high-level without conference affiliation into easy steps:
Step one: get a huge streaming plus linear deal for football like Notre Dame...
Notre Dame is supposedly seeking something like $65mil to $75 mil a year, which will be less than the SEC and Big10 payouts in the next few years.We should pay close attention to the next ND media deal. I really think it is the new frontier if ND can land a deal that will surpass the highest conference payout. Conferences like SEC and B1G will demand media companies to pay each school like the ND deal, and media companies will refuse. All it takes is media and streaming companies make one side deal with FSU or Ohio State to get a similar media deal like ND on the open market to get the floodgate open.