Why not just stay at the mid major at which they're already enrolled? There will be plenty of playing time and opportunity here. There may even be a new, competent coaching staff capable of developing their skills.
Having a crappy year next year is only ok if we are starting fresh with a fresh voice in a total brand rebuild. This program cannot endure another year like this year, keeping all things the same.
He wrote a book after the Kemba championship. He posted here promoting the book. He tweets now.
Is there an imminent NCAA rule where transfers won't have to sit out a year? Or was that an idea being discussed?
Its been discussed but no change has taken place, and won't take place for this coming year. Meaning anyone who transfers has to sit out a year, whether KO is fired or not.
Houston, Tulsa, Tulane, SMU, UCF have all gotten new coaches in the past few years and all have improved dramatically ..... so much for your “it can’t be done cause we’re in the AAC nonsense” And stop lying.... You DEFINITELY CARE WHETHER KO GETS FIRED.
I don't understand how people consider themselves fans and then call people Boatwright or Samuels or Gibson...
You know it really took Calhoun 4 years to complete the turnaround. The NIT sort of skews people’s memory but that team was 4-8 or something in the Big East just 1 game better than the year before. And something like 15-14 regular season and an NIT bubble team. The next year, his 3rd they went back to the NIT though it was an improved team by a lot. Fun note though, first NIT champ in 7 years to miss the NCAA tourney the next year. It wasn’t until Year 4 that they became the UConn everyone remembers.
This is basketball and unlike football it only takes a few good players to go along with what we have already to be competitive enough to make the tournament. Things may be bad right now but they are not as hopeless as they appear.
Calhoun only won 1 big east game his first year as head coach.
