A new announcing crew! | Page 2 | The Boneyard

A new announcing crew!

How long will it take before certain Boneyarders start complaining about the broadcast crew?


  • Total voters
    48
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
They should have a former UConn player be part of the crew, Meghan or Kara, becuase they KNOW whats its like to play for Geno, know the history of the program, and can add very interesting info on whats its like to be a UCONN player etc. Having some other media types doing the games will not be as interesting.
I think Meghan and Kara do a WONDERFUL JOB and don't want to lose either of them.
 
It is possible that ESPN, also, sells "production services" such as production of game coverage and uses their available talent to do the coverage for those games.
 
Mike Gorman works for the Celtics so he'll be too busy.

No way ESPN allows Rebecca Lobo. And I doubt she'd give up that job.

Gorman was great when he had the job before. A true pro. And I bet Lobo could have the job if offered. Big-time ESPN announcers like Mike Breen and Dave O'Brien are allowed to do local gigs. But Lobo is a pretty dull listen. The status quo is fine.
 
Gorman was great when he had the job before. A true pro. And I bet Lobo could have the job if offered. Big-time ESPN announcers like Mike Breen and Dave O'Brien are allowed to do local gigs. But Lobo is a pretty dull listen. The status quo is fine.

I agree... jokes too much IMO (but at the same time I guess that makes her feel comfy)
 
I agree... jokes too much IMO (but at the same time I guess that makes her feel comfy)
I love Rebecca's sideline reporting, but when she is at courtside calling the game, she seems to give the impression that she tries too hard to NOT favor UConn.
 
.-.
I think both Kara and Doris Burke have done men's games on SNY.

That's because SNY picked up a ESPN 3 broadcast. Unless we hear otherwise, ESPN is not a part of this project. Do not expect to see the games on ESPN3. Do not expect ESPN braodcast personalities to announce the games.

/end bubble bursting
 
They should have a former UConn player be part of the crew, Meghan or Kara, becuase they KNOW whats its like to play for Geno, know the history of the program, and can add very interesting info on whats its like to be a UCONN player etc. Having some other media types doing the games will not be as interesting.
I think Meghan and Kara do a WONDERFUL JOB and don't want to lose either of them.
I agree they bring knowledge of the UConn environment, what it is like to play for Geno, etc. But on the flip side, this is the very reason why they so frequently struggle to actually call the game. Too much familiarity leads to lapsing into anecdotes that can ramble on seemly without end while the game is happening right in front of them. And people like Rebecca, who is VERY good, sometimes tries so hard not to show her UConn bias that it almost comes off like she is fawning all over the other team.

If UConn is trying to market the team to a broader viewing base, SNY needs to find a team that can bring the right mix. Fill in dead ball time with short and interesting tid-bits that add some human interest to the players, but still manage to professionally call the game without excessive "oh-HO-HOs and hee-hee-hees! Don't get me wrong, I love Meghan. But sometimes her over exuberance and giddiness got on my nerves.
 
I agree they bring knowledge of the UConn environment, what it is like to play for Geno, etc. But on the flip side, this is the very reason why they so frequently struggle to actually call the game. Too much familiarity leads to lapsing into anecdotes that can ramble on seemly without end while the game is happening right in front of them. And people like Rebecca, who is VERY good, sometimes tries so hard not to show her UConn bias that it almost comes off like she is fawning all over the other team.

If UConn is trying to market the team to a broader viewing base, SNY needs to find a team that can bring the right mix. Fill in dead ball time with short and interesting tid-bits that add some human interest to the players, but still manage to professionally call the game without excessive "oh-HO-HOs and hee-hee-hees! Don't get me wrong, I love Meghan. But sometimes her over exuberance and giddiness got on my nerves.
I hope all the anti Bob & Megan don't want to eat their words if we get some of the many really bad announcers, I've heard this past year
 
I like the idea of a rotating crew:
• play-by-play is from rotating crew of HuskyNan, alexrgct, vowel guy and ericsandiego
• color is a rotating team of icebear, doggydaddy, oldcoach and MilfordHuskey
• the only permanent member is tonyc who does the sideline reporting every game
Heck, I'd pay double my annual CPTV pledge for that entertainment package.
Very funny. Actually, Tony has been working the sidelines for years. :)
 
.-.
I hope all the anti Bob & Megan don't want to eat their words if we get some of the many really bad announcers, I've heard this past year
Nope. I will just flip over to WTIC to listen to the radio broadcast while I watch the game :)
 
As far as contractual issues, Rebecca did Sun games when they were on Channel 20, definitely not an ESPN outlet. So clearly there's some flexibility in her contract there. Unfortunately Gorman already has a very high-profile and well-paying winter gig. Megan did well with Eric the times I heard them broadcast together. There's really nothing wrong with either Bob or Megan, as was shown when they each worked games with different people this past season, it's just that they got too comfortable, too used to one another, and the result went beyond stale to deteriorating quality of broadcast. I have to admit though that I think that Bob and LaChina could be an outstanding team.
 
As far as contractual issues, Rebecca did Sun games when they were on Channel 20, definitely not an ESPN outlet. So clearly there's some flexibility in her contract there. Unfortunately Gorman already has a very high-profile and well-paying winter gig. Megan did well with Eric the times I heard them broadcast together. There's really nothing wrong with either Bob or Megan, as was shown when they each worked games with different people this past season, it's just that they got too comfortable, too used to one another, and the result went beyond stale to deteriorating quality of broadcast. I have to admit though that I think that Bob and LaChina could be an outstanding team.
not the #6 block shot leader in "Wake Forest" history :rolleyes:
 
Personally I really hope they hire Bob and Meghan - just to twist some skivives here.
I voted one game, but I really think it will be less than 4 minutes. :)
 
As far as contractual issues, Rebecca did Sun games when they were on Channel 20, definitely not an ESPN outlet.

As I've said, big difference between allowing your talent to work for a small, local provider vs the network that is trying to challenge your national dominance.
 
.-.
As I've said, big difference between allowing your talent to work for a small, local provider vs the network that is trying to challenge your national dominance.

Herbst is looking to advance UCONN...that is her job.
 
I just wish whoever they get would call the game. Things like who just subbed in, what the whistle was for. Even telling me which player has the ball is often helpful. I really don't need to be told the favorite color of the second grade teacher of the mother of player x (not to be confused with Xavier McDaniels) or even where the announcing crew had dinner last night. JUST CALL THE GAME. Even though TV is a visual medium, the cameras only catch so much. The announcing crew can provide real value by telling us what we don't see (clearly). Otherwise, they are just noise.
(With that said, the color commentary can add greatly be reminding us of things such as a players past performance at the free throw line and/or telling us why a particular offensive or defensive effort worked or didn't work)
If the announcing crew did these things, what can possibly get stale?
If they "JUST CALLED THE GAME", even blowouts are interesting as we can become students of the game.
Here you go Tiff takes the ball out of bounds , passes to Caroline, caroline dribbles 5 times then passes on the wing to Kaleena,
are you kidding ? It's visual and I for one of many, enjoy getting inside news from behind the scenes, especially in a blowout.
 
Here you go Tiff takes the ball out of bounds , passes to Caroline, caroline dribbles 5 times then passes on the wing to Kaleena,
are you kidding ? It's visual and I for one of many, enjoy getting inside news from behind the scenes, especially in a blowout.

Phil - I've felt the same way for years. It's TV! I can see what's going on. I know the UConn players by sight. I don't need somebody to tell me that Dolson fouled or that Hartley made the 3. If I feel that I missed something I simply back up the DVR.

The only reason announcers are needed is to keep from wasting the available audio.
If they played elevator music during the game I would be OK with that.
 
Phil - I've felt the same way for years. It's TV! I can see what's going on. I know the UConn players by sight. I don't need somebody to tell me that Dolson fouled or that Hartley made the 3. If I feel that I missed something I simply back up the DVR.

The only reason announcers are needed is to keep from wasting the available audio.
If they played elevator music during the game I would be OK with that.

As I have said before, TV is only a semi visual media. Many people have the TV on and are doing multiple things. As I type right now I am listening/watching a medical show and, also, the afternoon news. I, myself, prefer the quality PxP call to alert me to when I need to give attention to the TV, especially, in a replay era where it is possible to then see the play or on the DVR to quickly rewind it and check it out. I would bet that those who sit and only focus on the screen with full attention today are the minority. I say this from being in and out of about a dozen to two dozen homes a week and seeing peoples viewing habits. It is an error to assume people only watch TV.
 
And I would contend that even those who do stay glued to the tv and are focused only on the TV, only see a small portion of all that is going on of relevance on the floor. When you don't see the ref in the picture, and you don't see "away from the ball", how can you possibly know which player was cited for a foul. And sure, you may know all the UCONN players by sight, but do you know every opposing player?
I guess we all have different desires when watching a game. I prefer they call the game. For me, telling me (possibly again) what I can see on the screen is less objectionable than missing what they didn't show.
 
As I have said before, TV is only a semi visual media. Many people have the TV on and are doing multiple things. As I type right now I am listening/watching a medical show and, also, the afternoon news. I, myself, prefer the quality PxP call to alert me to when I need to give attention to the TV, especially, in a replay era where it is possible to then see the play or on the DVR to quickly rewind it and check it out. I would bet that those who sit and only focus on the screen with full attention today are the minority. I say this from being in and out of about a dozen to two dozen homes a week and seeing peoples viewing habits. It is an error to assume people only watch TV.

Why not put aside the knitting while the game is on? :D

Seriously, I typically watch TV with a book. However, with UConn games the TV usually has my undivided attention. Except the blowouts - it could be Dizzy Dean and Curt Gowdy announcing and they would still be boring.
 
.-.
images
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,329
Messages
4,564,364
Members
10,464
Latest member
Rollskies27


Top Bottom