- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,893
- Reaction Score
- 4,682
Agree, what was the deal with that? Not like UConn was up by 30.
They're Rutgers. Losing is in their DNA.
Agree, what was the deal with that? Not like UConn was up by 30.
The Technical Foul call for dunking pre-game was odd. Never heard of that one before. UConn was up 1 to 0 before the game started. Overall, ref called a lot of soft fouls, both ways and it showed-up in the barrage of free throws that RU had.
The RU fans sitting around me all agreed that the reason they lost was Brimah in the first 15 minutes and then Napier the rest of the way. He got hot and no one on RU could stop him.
Was not too happy with Boat's recklessness, like driving for a quick basket, which he missed, with about 2 minutes left up by 7. Pull it back and eat the clock. Also, Daniels acted like he broke his ankle and then was back in the 2nd half?
Agree whole heartedly about the soft fouls. UConn (Bazz in particular) adjusted to that and drove into contact time and time again.After watching it again, the only two really bad calls were the Samuel and-1 which was an NBA and-1 but not college and the 5th Wally Judge foul. That was just soft, IMO. Lots of soft fouls, but against both teams. Refs were fairly consistent on how they called contact on both sides.
I don't get how that Rutgers team is that bad and have had the losses they had. I'm not just saying that because of how they played tonight but Mack/Seagers/Jack/Judge/Moore are solid pieces to work with, not NCAA tourney caliber but they shouldn't be below .500.
I really don't think any of us are in any position to question how Daniels reacted after his injury.
Agree...that interpretation should not be part of the new rules. I am all for cutting out the clutch and grab that L'ville was so famous for and cutting out Pitt's bump every cutter hard, but it just is not basketball to reward the offensive player for totally creating contact against a stationary defender. That being said, our bigs need to play like they understand this interpretation and either move their feet well enough to draw a proper charge or block the shot. They also need to coordinate their actions so only one defender is committing to the blocked shot and the other is boxing out. They are showing some improvement over the last few games (other than L'ville) in this regard.Yeah they were in the Bonus with 12 minutes left in the 2nd half and Bonus + with about 7 or 8 left…….the refs were the reason they were in the game. And Kadeem Jack was 11-14 from the line and he's a 50% shooter……they're too funny!
The stripes were equally awful both ways……..it's depressing watching a defender hold his spot and the offensive guy makes the contact and they blow the whistle on the defender? They are making this new rule very painful…….
I really don't think any of us are in any position to question how Daniels reacted after his injury.
Like the avatar!They got called for 1 more foul than us and we only took 5 more FTs. And that's with them giving a few fouls in the last minutes. Refs were mind bogglingly awful all around tonight though. They would call a ton of fouls for a few minutes then decide to swallow their whistle for a while. The double foul on Judge/Phil that they are whining about was the right call though. Phil pushed him and Judge pushed him back. Judge then made a horribly foolish foul for his fifth moments later. The real reason they lost is because Bazz just couldn't miss and they don't have the horses to keep up with a player like him.
Thanks brother! Couldnt resist.CL82 said:Like the avatar!