3 Scholarships For Next Year | Page 2 | The Boneyard

3 Scholarships For Next Year

I think Hawk is going to start. Maybe not right away. But he’ll be on a similar trajectory as Bouk was as a freshman. He’s a college ready 2 guard.
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised to see one of the freshmen work their way into the starting lineup.

But in December, that's what you're going to see. And either way, we need more shooters off the bench to replace what we're losing with Bouknight and Polley.
 
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised to see one of the freshmen work their way into the starting lineup.

But in December, that's what you're going to see. And either way, we need more shooters off the bench to replace what we're losing with Bouknight and Polley.
From the videos i’ve seen, Hawkins lives up to the “baby Ray” nickname from 3. He has a really nice shot form. I think he will help fill a lot of the scoring void we will lose from Bouk leaving.
 


Being the first FULL season with no waivers is gonna mean lots of available transfers
 
What if, for whatever reason Bouk decides to come back - then we are preseason Top 5 all day long. I'm just saying you never know, you never know. 😎
 
.-.
Our starting lineup next year is most likely:

Cole, Jackson, Martin, Sanogo, and either Akok (big) or Gaffney (small), with the 3 freshmen and Springs rounding out the bench.

1) We definitely need a shooter, and I'd prefer one who's more of a 2/3 (i.e. can handle the ball a little) than a 3/4 like Polley (who can defend the paint a little).
No worries, Gaff and Jordan Hawkings got this.
 
Our starting lineup next year is most likely:

Cole, Jackson, Martin, Sanogo, and either Akok (big) or Gaffney (small), with the 3 freshmen and Springs rounding out the bench.

1) We definitely need a shooter, and I'd prefer one who's more of a 2/3 (i.e. can handle the ball a little) than a 3/4 like Polley (who can defend the paint a little).

2) I'd also go for a reliable backup big to replace Carlton/Whaley. Someone who can at least defend and rebound, doesn't need to be a go-to scorer.

3) I'd consider a steady ball-handling guard, like a Craig Austrie type. He'd be behind Gaffney and Diggins on the depth chart, but could run things for 10-15 mpg if needed.
I don’t necessarily agree with this starting lineup. This leaves us with 1 perimeter piece that can shoot. Akok has not shown that he can rebound and efficiently score yet. We significantly improved without him. I love the kid and would love nothing more than to see him succeed but he has a lot to prove and overcoming an Achilles rupture when quick leaping is your edge is really hard. I like playing Jackson and Martin together at the forward spots with a shooter at the 2. So Hawk, or a transfer starting alongside Cole. Obviously Whaley returning is also a possibility here as well. If that’s the case I think there’s a chance that Martin comes off the bench.
 
Whalley should come back- he’s been terrific the last two seasons - perfect role player that continues to get better
 
whaley obviously has the best chance of making money somewhere next year so hypothetically speaking, lets just say polley and carlton come back...does Hurley then only fill 1 of the 3 open schollys?

9/10 guys max can be part of the rotation so why bring in more than 13 scholarship players when all 13 guys on the roster will be deserving of minutes as is?

cole/diggins/gaffney
jackson/hawkins
martin/polley
akok/johnson/springs
sanogo/carlton

polley and carlton would fill our 2 biggest needs i.e. a shooter on the wing and backup big man. hurley could go all in on a bouk replacement transfer to be the cherry on top of this top 5 preseason team

if hurley banked 2 schollys and cole and martin graduate next year then we'd have 4 open schollys for 2022, plus floyd. i'd much rather hurley spend all year recruiting 4 more guys for 2022 (including next summers transers) then try and land 3 transfers/reclasses over the summer for 2021
 
Last edited:
whaley obviously has the best chance of making money somewhere next year so hypothetically speaking, lets just say polley and carlton come back...does Hurley then only fill 1 of the 3 open schollys?

9/10 guys max can be part of the rotation so why bring in more than 13 scholarship players when all 13 guys on the roster will be deserving of minutes as is?

cole/diggins/gaffney
jackson/hawkins
martin/polley
akok/johnson/springs
sanogo/carlton

polley and a carlton would fill our 2 biggest needs i.e. a shooter on the wing and backup big man. hurley could go all in on a bouk replacement transfer to be the cherry on top of this top 5 preseason team

if hurley banked 2 schollys and cole and martin graduate next year then we'd have 4 open schollys for 2022, plus floyd. i'd much rather hurley spend all year recruiting 4 more guys for 2022 (including next summers transers) then try and land 3 transfers/reclasses over the summer for 2021
That lineup you provided can not shoot. Hurley does like traditional transfers. With BA gone and Cole a senior I think it’s highly likely we bring on another guard for next year. We would only be rostering 4 guards total, 2 of which are freshman, if we don’t AND team shooting is a glaring weakness. Need like a scoring or combo guard that can shoot. Hurley should sell a big name transfer on being the Bouknight replacement.
 
.-.
That lineup you provided can not shoot. Hurley does like traditional transfers. With BA gone and Cole a senior I think it’s highly likely we bring on another guard for next year. We would only be rostering 4 guards total, 2 of which are freshman, if we don’t AND team shooting is a glaring weakness. Need like a scoring or combo guard that can shoot. Hurley should sell a big name transfer on being the Bouknight replacement.
so...you agree? i argued hurley should only use 1 of the open schollys but that it should be on a bouk replacement
 
so...you agree? i argued hurley should only use 1 of the open schollys but that it should be on a bouk replacement
Keep in mind that both Cole and Martin have two more years of eligibility after this season if interested. For example, if Cole determined that he did not have a future career overseas because of his size, would he consider coming back to Storrs for two more years after this season instead of just one.
 
Last edited:
Keep in mind that both Cole and Martin have two more years of eligibility after this season if interested. For example, if Cole determined that he did not have a future career overseas because of his size, would he consider coming back to Storrs for two more years after this season.

Does it apply to everyone on the team regardless of class? Does Richie Springs still have 4 more years of eligibility after this year? I would expect the quality of college basketball as a whole to be really good the next couple years with so many upperclassmen taking advantage of this extra year.
 
Last edited:
Does it apply to everyone on the team regardless of class? Does Richie Springs still have 4 more years of eligibility after this year? I would expect the quality of college basketball as a whole to be really good the next couple years with so many upperclassmen taking advantage of this extra year.
Richie has four more years of eligibility after this season. The NCAA granted winter sport athletes an additional year of college athletic eligibility as a result of the COVID disruption in the 2020-2021 scheduling of games and its impact on the starts and stops of certain teams/athletes seasons. This is also why you do not see any redshirt activity this season since it's a "free" year re; athletic eligibility.

There is an additional disruption this year re: the ability of CBB players to enter the transfer portal without having to sit out a year as in years past. This new dynamic will impact how coaches recruit and build their rosters and how fluid athlete's movements among different BB programs will become and the impact in the grad transfer market as well.

Most BYers are already aware of these developments and is why the discussions about the future plans of our seniors Whaley/Polley/Carlton are discussed so frequently and why the future decision of BA is of interest re: the potential to open up a third scholarship for 2021. Since BA was acknowledged on Senior Night it is a possibility that this was his/UConn's way of suggesting he may choose to exit the Program after graduating in 3 years.. No public disclosures have been made by he and his family at this time as to his specific plans. Additionally, this is why Javonte Brown was able to transfer within the season without any concern about the effect it would have on his eligibility at his new landing spot.
 
Last edited:
.-.
Keep in mind that both Cole and Martin have two more years of eligibility after this season if interested. For example, if Cole determined that he did not have a future career overseas because of his size, would he consider coming back to Storrs for two more years after this season instead of just one.
and gaffney and akok and springs and sanogo and jackson. altho gaff and springs are the only guys that would prob consider that
 
Richie has four more years of eligibility after this season. The NCAA granted winter sport athletes an additional year of college athletic eligibility as a result of the COVID disruption in the 2020-2021 scheduling of games and its impact on the starts and stops of certain teams/athletes seasons. This is also why you do not see any redshirt activity this season since it's a "free" year re; athletic eligibility.

There is an additional disruption this year re: the ability of CBB players to enter the transfer portal without having to sit out a year as in years past. This new dynamic will impact how coaches recruit and build their rosters and how fluid athlete's movements among different BB programs will become and the impact in the grad transfer market as well.

Most BYers are already aware of these developments and is why the discussions about the future plans of our seniors Whaley/Polley/Carlton are discussed so frequently and why the future decision of BA is of interest re: the potential to open up a third scholarship for 2021. Since BA was acknowledged on Senior Night it is a possibility that this was his/UConn's way of suggesting he may choose to exit the Program after graduating in 3 years.. No public disclosures have been made by he and his family at this time as to his specific plans. Additionally, this is why Javonte Brown was able to transfer within the season without any concern about the effect it would have on his eligibility at his new landing spot.
Should probably just pin this to save precious future BY time
 
Richie has four more years of eligibility after this season. The NCAA granted winter sport athletes an additional year of college athletic eligibility as a result of the COVID disruption in the 2020-2021 scheduling of games and its impact on the starts and stops of certain teams/athletes seasons. This is also why you do not see any redshirt activity this season since it's a "free" year re; athletic eligibility.

There is an additional disruption this year re: the ability of CBB players to enter the transfer portal without having to sit out a year as in years past. This new dynamic will impact how coaches recruit and build their rosters and how fluid athlete's movements among different BB programs will become and the impact in the grad transfer market as well.

Most BYers are already aware of these developments and is why the discussions about the future plans of our seniors Whaley/Polley/Carlton are discussed so frequently and why the future decision of BA is of interest re: the potential to open up a third scholarship for 2021. Since BA was acknowledged on Senior Night it is a possibility that this was his/UConn's way of suggesting he may choose to exit the Program after graduating in 3 years.. No public disclosures have been made by he and his family at this time as to his specific plans. Additionally, this is why Javonte Brown was able to transfer within the season without any concern about the effect it would have on his eligibility at his new landing spot.
The thing you have to keep in mind with this is that anyone who stays the extra year that's an underclassman is taking a scholarship away from a freshman. Not an issue if one or 2 end up doing it but you can't have too many stay otherwise the roster starts to get really imbalanced. With the seniors it's a no brainer to accept any of them back, after that I think it's a much tougher decision
 
I, too, believe that Hurley should bring in a lottery pick transfer.
c'mon i mean a W capable of getting his own shot not a lotto pick... since when are comparisons taken so literally? by bouk replacement did you think for a second i meant we have to clone him?
 
Last edited:
With the seniors it's a no brainer to accept any of them back, after that I think it's a much tougher decision
are we sure it's a no brainer? there are pros and cons of having 16 guys fighting for playing time
 
.-.
are we sure it's a no brainer? there are pros and cons of having 16 guys fighting for playing time
Individually yes, not all 3 though. 16 is tough to make work even if you're taking guys to sit out with the open scholarships
 
The thing you have to keep in mind with this is that anyone who stays the extra year that's an underclassman is taking a scholarship away from a freshman. Not an issue if one or 2 end up doing it but you can't have too many stay otherwise the roster starts to get really imbalanced. With the seniors it's a no brainer to accept any of them back, after that I think it's a much tougher decision
No question about it. A huge challenge for Dan Hurley/staff re: roster construction and not trying to inhibit the growth of new recruits.

I believe that one of Dan Hurley's themes on the recruiting trail for new recruits and targets has been PT/minutes. So you have to balance that position with roster needs and growth of your younger players.

Clearly we're focused on the BET and the Tournament in the short term but if you're a prospective 2021 or 2022 recruit as our roster is currently constructed. The opportunity for minutes would appear to be there. Will be quite interesting in the off season for our next two seasons re:recruiting.

I trust the Carpenter.
 
No question about it. A huge challenge for Dan Hurley/staff re: roster construction and not trying to inhibit the growth of new recruits.

I believe that one of Dan Hurley's themes on the recruiting trail for new recruits and targets has been PT/minutes. So you have to balance that position with roster needs and growth of your younger players.

Clearly we're focused on the BET and the Tournament in the short term but if you're a prospective 2021 or 2022 recruit as our roster is currently constructed. The opportunity for minutes would appear to be there. Will be quite interesting in the off season for our next two seasons re:recruiting.

I trust the Carpenter.
What needs to be a focus with the additional 3 scholarships is finding good depth options/complementary pieces rather than looking for high impact recruits. Hurley already has high impact freshman coming in, what he needs are players that want to be at UCONN are patient enough to stay for several years and are willing to have supportive roles. That way he can continue to sell the more talented recruits on having available playing time and at the same time will have depth in his roster for multiple years.
 
Should probably just pin this to save precious future BY time
There are many more BYers who are more qualified than I --who can/ could post a more articulate characterization about the events of this year.

It appeared that @metsfan 2323 had missed the "memo" on this stuff over the last few months --Just trying to help him out.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,193
Messages
4,556,281
Members
10,441
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom