2026 Transfer Portal - UConn Interest Only | Page 8 | The Boneyard

2026 Transfer Portal - UConn Interest Only

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m warming up to the idea of Ross at the 4. Screens/Cuts/Open 3s, and defend larger wing forwards. He’d be a little small, but he’s actually close to Alex’s size, and more athletic. If it allows two ball handlers, Demary and Wilkins?/Tahaad?, and hopefully Mullins back at the 3, that lineup could be nice.

Tahaad/Wilkins
Demary
Mullins
Ross
C or Reibe

Solo 6th man
Landrew/Stew backing up the forwards
C or Riebe
County or vet PG

Someone probably gets cut off the 9 deep in tougher games, but that’s a solid plan on paper.
 
It does make you wonder if we should try to find and retain smaller PGs - kid like this can be someone you have for 4 years in a leadership role. Maybe we tried that with Nowell and it didn’t work we hoped.

I know we like the tall PGs, but I think there is a way to be tall everywhere else and be lightning quick at PG.
KW, SN, RB proved speed and quickness can be as important or moreso in the right player. Look what freshman Nigel James was able to do this year and what SB and RB did to the twin 6'5" Kentucky guards in the 2014 FF.
 
I’m warming up to the idea of Ross at the 4. Screens/Cuts/Open 3s, and defend larger wing forwards. He’d be a little small, but he’s actually close to Alex’s size, and more athletic. If it allows two ball handlers, Demary and Wilkins?/Tahaad?, and hopefully Mullins back at the 3, that lineup could be nice.

Tahaad/Wilkins
Demary
Mullins
Ross
C or Reibe

Solo 6th man
Landrew/Stew backing up the forwards
C or Riebe
County or vet PG

Someone probably gets cut off the 9 deep in tougher games, but that’s a solid plan on paper.
No way, that team is way too small and skinny.
 
That’s the thing that stuck out to me this weekend. We were by far the smallest and least athletic of the 4 teams. Some good shooting on Saturday and overall toughness and heart for the weekend (and the best coach in America) almost got them to the finish line.
Question is - would you rather Hurley win with "his guys" even if he has to squeak out wins like he did this year, or would you rather he pull together the most bullet proof roster possible? The latter might mean blowing up guys he recruited out of HS.
 
.-.
I’m warming up to the idea of Ross at the 4. Screens/Cuts/Open 3s, and defend larger wing forwards. He’d be a little small, but he’s actually close to Alex’s size, and more athletic. If it allows two ball handlers, Demary and Wilkins?/Tahaad?, and hopefully Mullins back at the 3, that lineup could be nice.

Tahaad/Wilkins
Demary
Mullins
Ross
C or Reibe

Solo 6th man
Landrew/Stew backing up the forwards
C or Riebe
County or vet PG

Someone probably gets cut off the 9 deep in tougher games, but that’s a solid plan on paper.
Looks like a mid 20teens nova squad.
 
I’m warming up to the idea of Ross at the 4. Screens/Cuts/Open 3s, and defend larger wing forwards. He’d be a little small, but he’s actually close to Alex’s size, and more athletic. If it allows two ball handlers, Demary and Wilkins?/Tahaad?, and hopefully Mullins back at the 3, that lineup could be nice.

Tahaad/Wilkins
Demary
Mullins
Ross
C or Reibe

Solo 6th man
Landrew/Stew backing up the forwards
C or Riebe
County or vet PG

Someone probably gets cut off the 9 deep in tougher games, but that’s a solid plan on paper.
You lost me with ross at the 4
 
Question is - would you rather Hurley win with "his guys" even if he has to squeak out wins like he did this year, or would you rather he pull together the most bullet proof roster possible? The latter might mean blowing up guys he recruited out of HS.
Do whatever it takes to build an elite roster is what I say. I want us to be able to be in that tier that Michigan, Arizona, and Duke were all year where you knew those were the 3 most talented teams, no question about it. I thought our roster this season was talented, but more so top 8ish not top 3 or 4. If we can have a top 4 roster in terms of talent combined with Hurley's coaching, then we'll be able to compete for Final Fours every year.
 
I’m warming up to the idea of Ross at the 4. Screens/Cuts/Open 3s, and defend larger wing forwards. He’d be a little small, but he’s actually close to Alex’s size, and more athletic. If it allows two ball handlers, Demary and Wilkins?/Tahaad?, and hopefully Mullins back at the 3, that lineup could be nice.

Tahaad/Wilkins
Demary
Mullins
Ross
C or Reibe

Solo 6th man
Landrew/Stew backing up the forwards
C or Riebe
County or vet PG

Someone probably gets cut off the 9 deep in tougher games, but that’s a solid plan on paper.
I try to keep an open mind about all suggestions but Ross and or Stew cannot be our starting four. Just no.
 
.-.
Question is - would you rather Hurley win with "his guys" even if he has to squeak out wins like he did this year, or would you rather he pull together the most bullet proof roster possible? The latter might mean blowing up guys he recruited out of HS.
Who are these guys that need "blowing up" and why would any future recruit believe the line that Hurley is selling after he did this? And remember, this is UConn so it usually isn't "come for top dollar" -- Hurley have to sell players on team, hard-work, loyalty, and development.
 
Who are these guys that need "blowing up" and why would any future recruit believe the line that Hurley is selling after he did this? And remember, this is UConn so it usually isn't "come for top dollar" -- Hurley have to sell players on team, hard-work, loyalty, and development.
Multiple times this year, hurley was in disbelief how bad the 3 point shooting was. Hence post game against duke when he said his own assistants wouldn't give the stats! Hurley seemed resigned in post game vs Michigan by saying we didn't make enough shots. Im sure he was aware they missed 21 3 point shots. He bit his tongue post game, didn't blame the kids for missing, but after the duke game and missing 21 3 pointers against Michigan, the look on his face almost said that he wished he coached the game differently. Duke/Michigan games were horrible from 3. Almost feels like Hurley was blaming himself for way to many 3 point attempts, especially when for 2 games they weren't dropping. Well maybe next year!
 
Multiple times this year, hurley was in disbelief how bad the 3 point shooting was. Hence post game against duke when he said his own assistants wouldn't give the stats! Hurley seemed resigned in post game vs Michigan by saying we didn't make enough shots. Im sure he was aware they missed 21 3 point shots. He bit his tongue post game, didn't blame the kids for missing, but after the duke game and missing 21 3 pointers against Michigan, the look on his face almost said that he wished he coached the game differently. Duke/Michigan games were horrible from 3. Almost feels like Hurley was blaming himself for way to many 3 point attempts, especially when for 2 games they weren't dropping. Well maybe next year!
They do need to work on being less reliant on the 3, but I am not going to kill Hurley for landing Mullins. A lot of this particular problem will likely work its way out after the coming season (and the coming title led by the stellar three-point shooting).
 
They do need to work on being less reliant on the 3, but I am not going to kill Hurley for landing Mullins. A lot of this particular problem will likely work its way out after the coming season (and the coming title led by the stellar three-point shooting).
Only question is, will he want to become a better player at uconn or move to the nba to become a better shooter? Maybe its just me but I didn't see nba level shooting from a consistent basis. Especially in the tournament. At the end of the day! Was the highly dependent 3 point shooting offensive hurley or Luke Murray? Either way it does need to be much less reliant on 3 point shooting
 
They do need to work on being less reliant on the 3, but I am not going to kill Hurley for landing Mullins. A lot of this particular problem will likely work its way out after the coming season (and the coming title led by the stellar three-point shooting).
I disagree. Look at Bama, they're basically like us offensively (only 3s and shots around the basket), but they rely even more on the 3 ball and Oats has had them as the #2, #4, and #3 offense on KenPom the last 3 years.

The problem with this team offensively was simply that our shooters who we thought would be good enough, weren't quite good enough. Solo went from being a 40% shooter to 30% and Mullins was only 33% when expectations were that he would be somewhere in the high 30s at least.
 
.-.
We are at a size and strength disadvantage on paper and on the court against them but that's not how it played out and I left the game unimpressed with Michigan. Mara is their best player and their biggest difference maker despite his stats and all the hype surrounding Lendeborg. He isn't Clingan but he has some of that same impact Clingan brought to games where it's damn near impossible to score over him and he shuts down the paint.

If the refs called that game fairly we win. Cadeau and Morez Johnson were allowed to two hand shove and hook our guys all night. If we made a couple more open threes we win despite the refs. We outrebounded them badly despite the size difference.

We do need to get more athletic and bigger up front though, I've been saying that all season.
Well said.

Were they bigger than us up front? Yes. Did we have several different ways to win this game regardless? Yes. Did size have anything whatsoever to do with those things not happening? Nope.

It was only Mara who we had no answer for - and from what I watched this season, we also made his life harder than almost anyone else.
 
Last edited:
Question is - would you rather Hurley win with "his guys" even if he has to squeak out wins like he did this year, or would you rather he pull together the most bullet proof roster possible? The latter might mean blowing up guys he recruited out of HS.

The real question is whether Hurley would even want to go that route.

Hurley has been consistent in stating that he prefers to build his core through development—recruiting freshmen, developing them within the system, and then supplementing with multi year transfer portal players rather than relying on it.

Public perception of him is that he’s a , the reality appears quite different. His players consistently respond to him, and there’s a clear level of trust and respect within the program. That culture has been a significant factor in their success.

I personally do not see Hurley changing his style anytime soon.
 
Part of being a good shooter is knowing what types of shots to take and when to take said shots. Way too often we took ill advised three pointers or fast breaks where it was 1 on 2 or 1 on 3.

We were very reliant on the 3 as the season progressed. A lot of that dependency was due to our system and also lack of offensive creators.

I think coach recognized that and hopefully we can become a bit more diverse offensively
 
The real question is whether Hurley would even want to go that route.

Hurley has been consistent in stating that he prefers to build his core through development—recruiting freshmen, developing them within the system, and then supplementing with multi year transfer portal players rather than relying on it.

Public perception of him is that he’s a , the reality appears quite different. His players consistently respond to him, and there’s a clear level of trust and respect within the program. That culture has been a significant factor in their success.

I personally do not see Hurley changing his style anytime soon.

Only thing changing it is if the players change so much he has to. He doesn’t have a Fab 5 after next year, no sophomore class and a small class coming in. Not sure he’s going to have many 3/4 year kids anymore.
 
Well said.

Were they bigger than us up front? Yes. Did we have several different ways to win this game regardless? Yes. Did size have anything whatsoever to do with those things not happening? Nope.

It was only Mara who we had no answer for - and from what I watched this season, we also made his life harder than almost anyone else.
Reed was off all game because of Mara. They blocked like 7 shots some at crucial moments and dominated us in the paint so I'd say yes size was a key factor.
 
.-.
The real question is whether Hurley would even want to go that route.

Hurley has been consistent in stating that he prefers to build his core through development—recruiting freshmen, developing them within the system, and then supplementing with multi year transfer portal players rather than relying on it.

Public perception of him is that he’s a , the reality appears quite different. His players consistently respond to him, and there’s a clear level of trust and respect within the program. That culture has been a significant factor in their success.

I personally do not see Hurley changing his style anytime soon.
That’s definitely his preference but I doubt he will sacrifice winning for that. That doesn’t mean going full mercenary like Michigan, but IMO he’s learned some stuff over the last two seasons about gambling on development that he’ll weigh in to roster construction.
 
He does - hate him if he's on the other team, love him if he's on your team. He'll do those little things that get in the opponents head.

May has a very good eye for talent.
UNC fans didn't feel that way....
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,368
Messages
4,568,445
Members
10,472
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom