meyers7
You Talkin’ To Me?
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 23,516
- Reaction Score
- 60,892
Is one of these evaluation sites--Blue Star, Prospects Nation, ESPN, et al--considered the "gold standard" in this area?
All of the ratings services are totally subjective and there's no way to know why they sometimes change rankings as radically as they do..tends to make me doubt their baseline numbers to begin with......a player doesn't loose skills, they simply may not reach their level of expectations while others may surpass them over time......as long as a player stays in the top tier of ranked players I don't particularly care if they are ranked number one or number fifteen .....if Brunelle averages 20 points and 10 rebounds a game in Argentina and Boston has just an OK week does Brunelle get her number one ranking back?
Definitely not. They all have built in biases and inconsistencies based on geography, AAU program affiliation, sneaker company affiliation & down right shady people.
That's why I've always got as many ranking services as I could (Bluestar, Hoopgurlz, Prospect Nations, ASGR if I can find them) and combined them (averaged them out). Come up with my own list. Give you a decent overview.