SimpleDawg
Dan Mullen, Dak Prescott, and Vic Schaefer fan
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
- Messages
- 1,250
- Reaction Score
- 2,064
McDonald wasn't really McDonald yet. She was a Fr. that showed some promise but no idea she would blossom into the scoring machine she was at Arizona. Remains to be seen about her, but but so far other than Plum there were no future WNBA players on that team. Oshaor was a rock but she was giving up about 6 or 7 inches on McCowan and for maybe the first time ever couldn't displace someone with her strength, so she was helpless in that matchup. UW was hot and cold, but other than Plum and Osahor there weren't any other dependable players on that roster. I strongly disagree with you, finishing tied for 2nd in a very strong conference and nearly winning 30 games w/ that roster was quite an accomplishment. With a different matchup maybe they could've won their 3rd round game, but I think they pretty well maxed out that season. Overall they were better than the Final 4 team, but didn't catch fire in the post season the same way, and were very much missing a dependable third scorer like they had w/ Talia Walton.
Sure, I can see that reasoning. But i think UDub had more star power than Mississippi State did. McCowan wasn't really McCowan yet either. She was not a regular starter, wasn't that good in the postseason apart from one game against the Huskies, and certainly didn't garner her elite reputation until the following year. William hadn't yet played those 2 games that she's basically known for.... those 2 games (UConn and Baylor) are pretty much her reputation. So the only real star we had was Vivians. With Washington, you can argue they had at least 2 players at that time considered superior to our basically 1. So yeah... I think most people favored the Huskies.