1 or 2 Seed Better?

[NJHusky]

For any of the 6 championship teams, were there any teams or bad match ups you were concerned about before the brackets were revealed or after they were revealed?

Louisville in 14. We lost to them 3x

 

[Iluvsuebird]

Since Duke likely secured the 1 seed in the East with its win over Michigan….

Would you rather see us as a 2 seed in the East or a 1 seed in the South?

It’s a “pick your poison” situation either way, but Duke scares me. I’d rather avoid Duke until the Final 4, even if it means a road matchup in the Elite 8 with Houston.

What are your thoughts?

You do not know your history, do you??? Duke all the way.

 

[RuffRuff]

Louisville in 14. We lost to them 3x

In 23, Houston worried me. That was a talented team with Shead, Walker, Roberts. Pack just caught fire from 3 for Miami to knock them out.

 

[B1GEast]

I think even if we take one more loss, if we win the Big East, we can still have a good shot at a number one seed

The number one seeds face the 8/9 winner in the next game.

The 8/9 seed would be a team like Kentucky, Villanova or Texas A&M

That's the only concern about a one seed, but you have to play the teams in front of you non the less

 

[gsmooth]

1999 and 2004 no team scared me. In 2011 Cincinnati scared me. 2014 everybody scared me but I was confident vs Mich St. 2023, maybe Gonzaga. 2024 absolutely nobody scared me.

Just conference opponents.

I can honestly say for the 1999, 2004, and 2024 I was not worried about the draws and match ups and that includes any of the conference opponents. For 2023, I would've been concerned about Marquette because they had Oliver Maxence-Prosper and he could shut down Jordan Hawkins. The games Jordan Hawkins went off were games UConn won that year, for the most part, and Shaka Smart correctly identified this and put OMP on Hawkins even though OMP's offense was negatively impacted.

For 2011 I was concerned for every match, but in retrospect I feel I didn't have to worry about any select few teams I wanted UConn to avoid-that 2011 team was determined and was on a run for the ages. The 2014, I wanted no part of Louisville.

 

[connVA]

Right now it feels like there are two tiers at the top. Duke, Mich, and Az are going to get the top 3 #1s in some order barring one of them losing multiple games. Below them are UConn, Houston, and Iowa State for the #1 in the South and the top two #2s. So the two best scenarios for us are: 1) Houston stays as the second #2 (or worse) meaning they won’t be put in the South with us; or 2) Duke slips to the third #1 and we slip to the second #2 (more likely Houston and Iowa State just pass us because of their tougher remaining schedules) putting us in the East with them.

 

[UofCT]

Is Scheyer still coaching Duke? Then I'll take Duke as a potential Elite 8 matchup any day of the week (and twice on Sunday) just on its own.

But when weighed against having to play a potential team in the Elite 8 in their home state...it is not even a debate.

Want to hear an incredible factoid that I don't think people realize :

In the past 20 years, UConn has only lost two games after the first weekend of the tournament--and they were both us having to play a team in their home state/location.

In the last 35 years, UConn has only lost 8 games after the first weekend. Of those 8 total losses for UConn...6 of them were us having to play against a team in their home state/location.

So UConn essentially either blows it in the first weekend, gets stuck having to play an away game in the NCAA tournament, or wins the Championship. That is crazy to me.

Here are all of our NCAA losses in the past 35 years after the first weekend:

2009 vs Michigan State in Detroit, MI
2006 vs George Mason in Washington, DC
2003 vs Texas in San Antonio, TX
2002 vs Maryland in Syracuse, NY
1998 vs North Carolina in Greensboro, NC
1996 vs Mississippi State in Lexington, KY
1995 vs UCLA in Oakland, CA
1994 vs Florida in Miami, FL

Duke made the final four last year and Elite 8 the year prior. The Scheyer doesn't know what he's doing narrative is just false.

 

[gsmooth]

In 23, Houston worried me. That was a talented team with Shead, Walker, Roberts. Pack just caught fire from 3 for Miami to knock them out.

It's odd I wasn't worried about Houston even if the Final Four was in Houston. I was concerned about that Miami match up because I saw their game against Houston and how they picked apart Houston's defense with Nigel Pack, Isaiah Wong, and Jordan Miller and how off script their offense can operate with their 1-on-1 abilities-it concerned the hell out of me. I didn't want another loss to Jim Larranaga.

 

[controlfade]

Agree, the kicker is that they'd likely have to beat us to get there. Can't have both.

I'd gladly swap to the 1 in that same region. I tend to think Florida will also be a 2 seed when it's all said and done, with one of Illinois or Purdue bumping out.

Florida is dangerous but I'm not really worried about Illinois or Purdue.

 

[ucp990411]

I can honestly say for the 1999, 2004, and 2024 I was not worried about the draws and match ups and that includes any of the conference opponents. For 2023, I would've been concerned about Marquette because they had Oliver Maxence-Prosper and he could shut down Jordan Hawkins. The games Jordan Hawkins went off were games UConn won that year, for the most part, and Shaka Smart correctly identified this and put OMP on Hawkins even though OMP's offense was negatively impacted.

For 2011 I was concerned for every match, but in retrospect I feel I didn't have to worry about any select few teams I wanted UConn to avoid-that 2011 team was determined and was on a run for the ages. The 2014, I wanted no part of Louisville.

I was thinking teams after the brackets were released

 

[Tenspro2002]

Right now it feels like there are two tiers at the top. Duke, Mich, and Az are going to get the top 3 #1s in some order barring one of them losing multiple games. Below them are UConn, Houston, and Iowa State for the #1 in the South and the top two #2s. So the two best scenarios for us are: 1) Houston stays as the second #2 (or worse) meaning they won’t be put in the South with us; or 2) Duke slips to the third #1 and we slip to the second #2 (more likely Houston and Iowa State just pass us because of their tougher remaining schedules) putting us in the East with them.

Why would us being #2 in the East with Duke be a good outcome?

 

[RuffRuff]

Current FD odds have us 8th. Find it fairly surprising we are 2x Florida and that much lower than Illinois & ISU.

 

[businesslawyer]

After seeing the reveal, I realized it’s probably unlikely we’d get the 2 in the East, because there are so many B1G and XII teams they have to avoid putting together. They can’t put their two outliers, us and Duke, in the same region except in some narrow circumstances.

I’m back on team “just win the stupid games and go get a 1 seed,” even if it’s in the South with Houston. As has been discussed, the 4s look particularly weaker than the 3s. And then, screw it, I’ll take our chances against Houston in the Elite Eight.

Also, with the win over Michigan Duke is unlikely to be worse than the #2 national seed, and we would have to lose twice more to slip to 7 or 8 where we’d be in their region.

 

[RuffRuff]

Florida is dangerous but I'm not really worried about Illinois or Purdue.

I have no concerns with Purdue, soft as charmin. I do think Illinois can present matchup issues. When they are on, they are on. That is a very talented roster, with 2 strong guards and size in the front court. They could easily be 2 loss as they have 3 OT losses. Illinois feels like the kind of team that can beat anyone.

 

[connVA]

The best case is obviously us being in the South with ISU but if I have to choose one of the other three I’ll take Hurley in a chess match with Scheyer. Also easier for the fan base (including me selfishly) to get there.