Really not trying to belabor this. But you can make an top 25 NBA players list, and there will be some quibbling, but a general agreement of what it means and who deserves it.
College, no. You're using different criteria for different players. That's why no one knows what to do with Kevin...
The criteria for these things change from one player to the next. Amazing four-year player, had one great season, turned into a top NBA player, etc. It's as arbitrary as you can get
Your "you don't understand if you didn't play" thing is sad.
There were many analysts who found our most effective lineups last year had Samson Johnson in them. I'm not digging them up, but they were out there for anyone to read. I understand Reed passed the eye test, but there's actually more...
For the Big East is says: "Rutgers, West Virginia, Syracuse and Pittsburgh are back where they belong."
Rutgers and W.Va weren't close to original members and left years ago. Who cares about them?
We all saw that Duke game. They were cheapo fouls and to take that one example to prove he was foul prone is bad logic.
Also, you think Okafor didn't alter shots? Over 4 blocks a game and you think that's the sum total of his defense?
An interesting question might be "What non-All American, non-NBA player would you add to this team"
Maybe that really would be Charles Okwandu
(Of course it would be Charles Okwandu)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.