You think it'd be a good idea to turn down a spot for our football program in the Big 12?Asinine. We left the CYO league for a reason.
I'll give you one more. The Big XII doesn't get exposure in the Northeast if they just take us for football. To have an entrance into Metro New York, they need New Yorkers to be hooked by UConn hoops. UConn football gets them Connecticut only.
This would really put a wrinkle into the ten toes in motto. How many toes do we have to go around? Two toes in the Big 12? 5 in the Big East? A couple more toes in Hockey East... one smaller toe endlessly waiting for the ACC and Big 10 to call?If this is being floated as a trial boat, it means Texas has one foot plus like three toes out the door.
Ha good luck with that....I think the author of the article just wanted this board to stop posting about logos.
Football only schools don't trigger the pro-rata. They're not going to expand and divvy up the pie even more. They're doing this to make some extra money for a few years, not give it away.
Football only schools don't trigger the pro-rata. They're not going to expand and divvy up the pie even more. They're doing this to make some extra money for a few years, not give it away.
It doesn't trigger it contractually, but it's feasible that the Big 12 could have negotiated something with the TV partners like this. The fact that they could get the pro rata increase incentivizes ESPN to come up with a cheaper option. I'm not saying that any of this is true, and it's almost certainly not, but it's not unreasonable that they could come to an agreement where all B12 teams get a small bump and ESPN/Fox save money doing football-only adds.
I'm not suggesting the big 12 isn't discussing, but it doesn't make sense on so many levels. It goes directly against Bowlsby's comments from last week regarding the entire AD being valued.First, I don't believe this source whatsoever.
Second, I don't think it's as crazy as people make it out to be.
1. The research apparently shows that having 12 teams increases the odds for making the CFP.
2. BYU is a national football brand and could be competitive from day 1. UConn would offer a piece of the northeast without having to send their Olympic teams there.
3. Big 12 schools would see their per team take increase all while ESPN/Fox save money from paying the full pro rata.
4. UConn would need a basketball home and I'm sure Fox would want us in the Big East with some scheduling arrangements with the Big 12.
So, again I don't believe the rumor, I don't believe it will happen, but I don't think it is insane.
I'm not suggesting the big 12 isn't discussing, but it doesn't make sense on so many levels. It goes directly against Bowlsby's comments from last week regarding the entire AD being valued.
outside of perception, how does this help uconn? their share for FB only in Big12 will be $5M and BE will get them $500K.
Great!!! Uconn is P5.
I mean, this is the same conference that is still interviewing Rice and SMU for potential membership.
For what it's worth (non-key tweet) ...
@ 16m16 minutes ago
Look for SMU and Rice to leak that they are no longer under consideration for B12 membership. UCF hasn't been told yet but it's coming.
Thanks for clearing that up. /sarcasmSorry, that tweet was from . Not sure why that didn't copy over too.
Sorry, that tweet was from . Not sure why that didn't copy over too.
Is M H ver3 a dirty word? Can I not type that here??
Is M H ver3 a dirty word? Can I not type that here??