Potential Replacements for Diaco | Page 11 | The Boneyard

Potential Replacements for Diaco

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
549
Reaction Score
1,086
Funny thing is you are probably too dense to realize you are arguing against hiring someone like Calhoun by saying we need to hire a big name and make a splash.

Fair enough. Who's a Calhoun-like football coach out there at the mid-major level like Northeastern?
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
549
Reaction Score
1,086
Funny thing is you are probably too dense to realize you are arguing against hiring someone like Calhoun by saying we need to hire a big name and make a splash.

The larger point, dude, is that the minute Calhoun got on the campus he told everyone this was "do-able". Not one one of your posts suggests that you think UConn football is "do-able". So many examples of football programs that came out of nowhere (Boise, Kansas State, Northwestern for a while, even Miami in early 1980s). What's your endgame for football? Back to I-AA? MAC?
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
2,310
Reaction Score
7,658
The larger point, dude, is that the minute Calhoun got on the campus he told everyone this was "do-able". Not one one of your posts suggests that you think UConn football is "do-able". So many examples of football programs that came out of nowhere (Boise, Kansas State, Northwestern for a while, even Miami in early 1980s). What's your endgame for football? Back to I-AA? MAC?
Comparing the basketball program in 1986 to the football program now makes you sound like a huge crackpot
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,285
Reaction Score
9,284
First, Diaco is here next season unless he decides not to be. He's not getting fired.

That said, I'd sign on for Morehead or Wilder in a heart beat. Forget "splashy" name hires. Both guys are/have been successful head coaches, both guys play an exciting brand of football, both guys have ties in the NE, and both guys would come in and win at UConn, bringing a more open style of offense that people have been pining for.

We won't hire either though.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,428
Reaction Score
19,917
No to be quite frank. The third smallest state in the union just doesn't have that many kids playing football.
Unless you are Texas or Florida you don't win by recruiting your home state anyway so available talent is not hugely relevant. You win by recruiting the 95 corridor and landing a few Florida kids and DEVELOPING the kids you have. And the goal isn't a national championship (if he is honest Calhoun will tell you that wasn't his at first either--doable meant competitive in the Big East). The goal is a consistent top 35ish program. Do that and from time to time you'll catch lightening in a bottle or land a Matt Ryan or Dan O and find yourself in the national conversation. That's the Boise model. Was the BC model and more or less the Houston and Navy models.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,065
Reaction Score
82,510
Unless you are Texas or Florida you don't win by recruiting your home state anyway so available talent is not hugely relevant. You win by recruiting the 95 corridor and landing a few Florida kids and DEVELOPING the kids you have. And the goal isn't a national championship (if he is honest Calhoun will tell you that wasn't his at first either--doable meant competitive in the Big East). The goal is a consistent top 35ish program. Do that and from time to time you'll catch lightening in a bottle or land a Matt Ryan or Dan O and find yourself in the national conversation. That's the Boise model. Was the BC model and more or less the Houston and Navy models.

And it's all any UConn fan would expect. We'd fill the Rent for a team like that. I don't think anyone is blind to our disadvantages.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,696
Reaction Score
15,437
Unless you are Texas or Florida you don't win by recruiting your home state anyway so available talent is not hugely relevant. You win by recruiting the 95 corridor and landing a few Florida kids and DEVELOPING the kids you have. And the goal isn't a national championship (if he is honest Calhoun will tell you that wasn't his at first either--doable meant competitive in the Big East). The goal is a consistent top 35ish program. Do that and from time to time you'll catch lightening in a bottle or land a Matt Ryan or Dan O and find yourself in the national conversation. That's the Boise model. Was the BC model and more or less the Houston and Navy models.
Boise State has competent QB play year in and year out though...
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,428
Reaction Score
19,917
And it's all any UConn fan would expect. We'd fill the Rent for a team like that. I don't think anyone is blind to our disadvantages.
Right. And you know what? That's all 120 of the 128 schools playing 1A football can expect. If I asked you to name 8 teams every August from which the 4 teams will be chosen my guess is you would get 2 every year and all 4 75% of the time. For everybody else the goal is to get into the conversation occasionally. Like Memphis and Temple and Houston all have been in recent years.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
4,634
Reaction Score
9,912
The larger point, dude, is that the minute Calhoun got on the campus he told everyone this was "do-able". Not one one of your posts suggests that you think UConn football is "do-able". So many examples of football programs that came out of nowhere (Boise, Kansas State, Northwestern for a while, even Miami in early 1980s). What's your endgame for football? Back to I-AA? MAC?
Your posts get harder and harder to respond to, but I will try. Saying Les Miles will have better options than UConn is not saying UConn should go back to 1-AA, that leap is really something even for you.

Diaco walked in here and said it was "do-able" in fact he said it was a lot more than that, so again you Calhoun references are just off base.

UConn can be decent in football with hiring the right coach, but you need to realize that saying Miles will have better options is not setting the bar low or saying UConn has no chance at success, it is simply being realistic and having some understanding of where UConn is in the national landscape for football.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
549
Reaction Score
1,086
Saying Miles will have better options is not setting the bar low or saying UConn has no chance at success, it is simply being realistic and having some understanding of where UConn is in the national landscape for football.

Again, not saying is Miles my only choice. My beef with you is how quickly you shot it out of the sky.

Now we're getting somewhere. How do you define "being decent in football"?
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,696
Reaction Score
15,437
Boise mostly gets system qbs who function well in what they want to do. And that is fine. I'd take it in a heartbeat.
Having system QB to fit your system and be competent at in that system is the goal of every CFB team at the FBS I'd imagine... Something we have a hard time with.... We gotta fix that...
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
2,310
Reaction Score
7,658
Can you really become "the next Boise" in the current CFB landscape?
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,428
Reaction Score
19,917
Can you really become "the next Boise" in the current CFB landscape?
Actually I think you can. Let's take Houston. All they have done is beat FSU last year and Oklahoma this year. Now 2 years in a row they have had wtf losses, to us last year and SMU this but if they come out next year and spank Arizona and Texas Tech they are there. Maybe they luck out and get a mid level ACC team in a bowl and smack them around this year. Or the beat Louisville. Who knows? Or Temple beats Notre Dame next year. Those are the type of wins that put and keep you in the limelight. I'd give an awful lot to beat Missouri next year even if they aren't going to be confused with Alabama
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
592
Reaction Score
1,242
Just like what Diaco's making
You asked for minimum it is likely Miles pushes for $3mill plus look up the coaches making $4 mill and over and tell me all of them are better than miles
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
592
Reaction Score
1,242
Let's take Houston.
Houston is a terrible example to compare UCONN to, they are located in Texas where you can field a top 25 team with just the recruits leftover after the Big12 is done recruiting the state. If you get a coach that can produce on the field and recruit, like Herman, you can field a national contender. The only non-P5 schools that have the potential to compete nationally would be those located in or around FL and TX, where the talent pool is large to draw from.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
549
Reaction Score
1,086
You asked for minimum it is likely Miles pushes for $3mill plus look up the coaches making $4 mill and over and tell me all of them are better than miles

But those guys over $4 million aren't in danger of losing their jobs, right?
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
592
Reaction Score
1,242
But those guys over $4 million aren't in danger of losing their jobs, right?
Charlie Strong, James Franklin, Gus Malzhan, and Butch Jones have all been on the hot seat I don't understand your point, and
Bobby Petrino got $3.8 mill to go back to Louisville I guarantee someone will fork that over for miles
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,428
Reaction Score
19,917
Houston is a terrible example to compare UCONN to, they are located in Texas where you can field a top 25 team with just the recruits leftover after the Big12 is done recruiting the state. If you get a coach that can produce on the field and recruit, like Herman, you can field a national contender. The only non-P5 schools that have the potential to compete nationally would be those located in or around FL and TX, where the talent pool is large to draw from.
Then everyone else should just drop football. You really and truly need to get past the idea that UConn is limited to recruiting Connecticut. Our pool extends from Boston through Virginia and then Florida. Houston can have teams because it has a coach who can recruit and the guy can coach. When they didn't gave that they were an afterthought. Boise is in Freaking Idaho. Why are they successful but Idaho dropped to 1AA? Why has KState been solid for years? There a fewer football players from Kansas that Connecticut and its in Kansas for heaven sakes. Location is an element but by no means a determining one. Or look at Navy. Do you have any idea of the nonsense those guys need to go through? And when the graduate they go into the Navy. Yet they are ranked. And they are exactly what I'm talking about. Top 35ish every year and when things break right they are top 25 or better.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
592
Reaction Score
1,242
Then everyone else should just drop football. You really and truly need to get past the idea that UConn is limited to recruiting Connecticut. Our pool extends from Boston through Virginia and then Florida. Houston can have teams because it has a coach who can recruit and the guy can coach. When they didn't gave that they were an afterthought. Boise is in Freaking Idaho. Why are they successful but Idaho dropped to 1AA? Why has KState been solid for years? There a fewer football players from Kansas that Connecticut and its in Kansas for heaven sakes. Location is an element but by no means a determining one. Or look at Navy. Do you have any idea of the nonsense those guys need to go through? And when the graduate they go into the Navy. Yet they are ranked. And they are exactly what I'm talking about. Top 35ish every year and when things break right they are top 25 or better.
You completely missed my point, and thats where you recruit matters. Boise recruits CA and the Pacific Northwest aggressively thats how they stay in the conversation, what I'm saying is that schools that have to recruit out of state and geographical area are at a disadvantage because by the time they find out about a kid it is likely that local schools have already reached out. Conference and school prestige can trump this disadvantage, which is the problem that UCONN has as the top recruits in the state get poached. The talent pool in the state isn't that great so we have to look outside of the state, but we haven't had a coach that can recruit out of state at a high level. Schools in TX and FL don't have to worry about their local talent pools drying up so they don't need coaches who can recruit out of state at a high level, just coaches who know the local area. Some people might say "whats the difference", well a coach who recruits locally can be someone who grew up or just knows the area and has local connections, local coaches often get recommended players first by head coaches so if a coach already has ties to the high school they can usually get the first crack at a prospect. UCONN tried this with Paul Pasqualoni, and he was somewhat successful recruiting in state, but failed out of state which in a state with a small talent pool this is crucial. This problem is nullified in southern states as their pools are hundreds of players deep compared to New England where all the states combined probably send 50ish kids total to D1 schools.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
454
Guests online
2,639
Total visitors
3,093

Forum statistics

Threads
157,150
Messages
4,085,369
Members
9,981
Latest member
Vincent22


Top Bottom