- Joined
- Dec 8, 2014
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction Score
- 1,264
Kentucky had no recruits in the Top 100 in 2016. Or did they all jump ship after coming aboard?
Duke Blue Devils only brought in 1 Top 10 recruit overall from the class of 2016. Is this normal for a school of their pedigree?
In the year of 2017, Duke has no Top 10 recruits but 1 or so futher down the food chain. And giving the fact recruiting is not in it's final stage there is still time.
Kentucky has not landed a Top 100 recruit as of yet for the class of 2017. Will 2016 repeat itself?
Tennessee after having none in 2016 is starting to pick up the pace. I expect them to do better.
My focus is on Duke & Kentucky. Two programs some months back who witness recruits bailing out due to controversy with their head coach or for whatever reasons unknown.
The fact that their administration kept these coaches at the helm was mind boggling to me personally. Student athletes (who bailed) at times do warn other incoming recruits if asked to provide insight regarding the current situations with the head coach or the program.
Players disseminating information regarding the present state of their programs -when requested - is nothing new.
And with that in mind was it wise to keep these coaches aboard knowing in advance such move can hurt recruiting? Just wondering.
Is it time for Kentucky and Duke to start panicking? I'm sure others may have a better take on this than I do. I am all ears.
Duke Blue Devils only brought in 1 Top 10 recruit overall from the class of 2016. Is this normal for a school of their pedigree?
In the year of 2017, Duke has no Top 10 recruits but 1 or so futher down the food chain. And giving the fact recruiting is not in it's final stage there is still time.
Kentucky has not landed a Top 100 recruit as of yet for the class of 2017. Will 2016 repeat itself?
Tennessee after having none in 2016 is starting to pick up the pace. I expect them to do better.
My focus is on Duke & Kentucky. Two programs some months back who witness recruits bailing out due to controversy with their head coach or for whatever reasons unknown.
The fact that their administration kept these coaches at the helm was mind boggling to me personally. Student athletes (who bailed) at times do warn other incoming recruits if asked to provide insight regarding the current situations with the head coach or the program.
Players disseminating information regarding the present state of their programs -when requested - is nothing new.
And with that in mind was it wise to keep these coaches aboard knowing in advance such move can hurt recruiting? Just wondering.
Is it time for Kentucky and Duke to start panicking? I'm sure others may have a better take on this than I do. I am all ears.