What the analytics were saying was that playing like we were two games ago we couldn't win a national championship. And that is true: if we played like we played against Providence or Villanova, we'd be knocked out in the second round.
Didn't get that sense at all. Reibe loves being here from what I've heard and the plan is for him to start next year. Non issue.
I haven't listened yet but isn't this the role he came here for? Did he really think he was starting over Reed? Or did he think they would split the 40 minutes evenly? Due to Reed's early season injury he got a lot of run early which helped him. Maybe Clingan's family needs to have a discussion with Reibe's family if they really have an issue.
Don't forget God Shamgod.
Sure sounded like it when Dan Hurley mentioned how Dc and family saw the big picture and it worked out ok for DC.
Yeah. That's exactly how I read it. So that's probably going on.
That’s not what I took away
clear difference in both Ross/Stew's approach the last 2 games after that Providence game when it looked like a grenade was in their hands whenever they touched it. Stew couldn't get his shots to drop tonight but at least like that he was looking to shoot and take it to the basket, he's gotta figure out a plan when he gets in the air though
Surprisingly, not the least bit boring at all.
The thing that surprise me was that you can call a flagrant in a review to determine out of bounds possession.
No, that's not remotely true. The analytics did not say that
What was the question that was asked?
Definitely sounded that way. Not a good look.
Analytics don’t count for missed open shots. We ran good O. We have finally started making open shots.
Here is the clip. I think you'd have to be assuming a lot to think Hurley is inferring Reibe and his camp are complaining about playing time.
I'll chime in here. The Analytics aren't saying anything other than stacking teams up one ahead of the other based on a set of metrics.
I agree with that, and as a result our offensive efficiency is going up. What I'm saying is our previous offensive efficiency was by no means prohibitive of winning for all the reasons you just said
It’s been a trend. I don’t get it. Seems like the students just aren’t that into UConn basketball like they used to be. I could make excuses about he cold weather or playing teams we are expected to beat but that wouldn’t have stopped them in the past. 22-1. 12-0. #3 in the country. Smh
Solo is a good all around player. I don’t mind his shot selection, but there are lot of good players on this team and he doesn’t have to take all the shots he takes. Both Reed and Reibe shoot at a high percentage and that should be priority over a Ball shot. Demary is very good at creating something out of nothing, and when nothing is happening I would like to see Demary take over rather than Ball, but Ball is a good plan B. I like it when Solo drives, and I like when the other team zones and he flashes to FT elbow and makes that shot. Ball is a great zone buster. He needs to shoot the 3P at 33% plus or he shouldn’t take them. He should be easily able to make that mark, given his form and shot selection, but if he doesn’t, it hurts the team.