Worst Contracts In Pro Sports History | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Worst Contracts In Pro Sports History

Joined
Apr 2, 2023
Messages
1,877
Reaction Score
9,532
Dak Prescott
While I would definitely agree that he’s not worth that money, I think it also signifies how weak the incoming crop of QB draft prospects is, and how hungry the QB needy teams are to get a QB. Sadly, if the Cowboys didn’t give Dak that deal, the Raiders or Cowboys might have next offseason.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2018
Messages
667
Reaction Score
2,222
I would have offered $31-32 million per year for 10 years early and if he turned it down, so be it. On a WAR basis, I thought he was worth that. They would have struggled with the luxury tax for a couple of years, but then would have come out the other side just fine.
That is around the range the Sox reportedly offered before being traded. Again I do think he wanted to go to free agency to help the players and that it probably would’ve taken $35M-40M a year for 8+ years for him to sign an extension before Covid. In the end, the David price and Chris sale deals made offering that much almost impossible. They’d be committing ~$90M to those 3 players coming off a disappointing year they weren’t really close to making the playoffs, with very little talent in the farm system. Kind of similar to the Yankees last year, except without one of the top farm systems to go out and make a Juan Soto like trade or even just supplement at trade deadlines. In retrospect, yes mookie still would’ve been worth that, but I don’t blame the Sox for moving him.

I think Bloom should’ve taken on some salary dumps in those years after trading Mookie (look for one of those Carl Crawford / Adrian Gonzalez type trades that the dodgers/sox also made except be on the other end of it), or ate the Price contract to get some better prospects in the trade. But clearly Red Sox ownership wanted to cut payroll so that wasn’t happening.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
5,242
Reaction Score
19,012
While I would definitely agree that he’s not worth that money, I think it also signifies how weak the incoming crop of QB draft prospects is, and how hungry the QB needy teams are to get a QB. Sadly, if the Cowboys didn’t give Dak that deal, the Raiders or Cowboys might have next offseason.
Right place, right time for him no doubt......but he's not worth haff that money, and I mean that on a relative basis. Obviously all of these contracts are just insane.
 

Inyatkin

Stairway to Seven
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
2,494
Reaction Score
9,781
Some weird entries on this list. A lot of injuries for Trout or Kawhi but anyone would have taken them and paid that at that point in their careers.
Giving big money to Daniel Jones, ever? That's a different story
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,450
Reaction Score
37,084
I always think of this guy when this topic comes up... Rusney Castillo - Wikipedia

On August 23, 2014, the Boston Red Sox signed Castillo to a seven-year, $72.5 million contract. Castillo was given the jersey number, 38, which he wore in Cuba.
Overall, in parts of three seasons with Boston (2014–2016), Castillo appeared in 99 MLB games, batting .262 with 7 home runs and 35 RBIs.
When I lived in Boston I went to one of his first games in 2014 and saw him hit a home run, in fact it may have been his first.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
50,272
Reaction Score
176,883
Some weird entries on this list. A lot of injuries for Trout or Kawhi but anyone would have taken them and paid that at that point in their careers.
Giving big money to Daniel Jones, ever? That's a different story
Did you edit this and take Pujols name out? I was going to tell you why the Pujols contract was always a terrible one.
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction Score
57,649


They paid him $100m/year for a two-year deal. He tore his ACL in his second game and has been out nearly a year at this point. By the time he gets back healthy — assuming it is only two more months — his deal will almost be over, and those two games will be all he’s played.

Nobody does it like Neymar. Even Trout’s got to be in awe of this.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
50,272
Reaction Score
176,883
Carl Pavano got paid $40M for 9 wins with Yanks, played in 26 games and averaged $250K per inning pitched over his 4 years contract.
Yeah but the Yankees paid Kevin Brown over $15 million per year for his two brilliant seasons pitching for them so it balances out.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2023
Messages
1,877
Reaction Score
9,532
That is around the range the Sox reportedly offered before being traded. Again I do think he wanted to go to free agency to help the players and that it probably would’ve taken $35M-40M a year for 8+ years for him to sign an extension before Covid. In the end, the David price and Chris sale deals made offering that much almost impossible. They’d be committing ~$90M to those 3 players coming off a disappointing year they weren’t really close to making the playoffs, with very little talent in the farm system. Kind of similar to the Yankees last year, except without one of the top farm systems to go out and make a Juan Soto like trade or even just supplement at trade deadlines. In retrospect, yes mookie still would’ve been worth that, but I don’t blame the Sox for moving him.

I think Bloom should’ve taken on some salary dumps in those years after trading Mookie (look for one of those Carl Crawford / Adrian Gonzalez type trades that the dodgers/sox also made except be on the other end of it), or ate the Price contract to get some better prospects in the trade. But clearly Red Sox ownership wanted to cut payroll so that wasn’t happening.
The blame lies with John Henry and FSG. They would have had 2 years of luxury tax penalties but would have come out the other side after Price’s contract expired. They’re cheap. That’s the bottom line. There’s no excuse to not spend on a frontline starting pitcher this off-season and the fan base is definitely paying attention.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
11,386
Reaction Score
30,818
Every year, I post about Bonilla's contract because every year (and thread like this) gets it wrong.

1) Every team has deferred deals just like this one. Ken Griffey Jr was the 4th highest paid Red last season (2023) and gets 3.6m a year.

2) That deal, at the time, used the saved cash to sign Mike Hampton, Derek Bell and Todd Zeile, who all helped the Mets to the National League pennant in 2000. That alone is worth it.
 

Inyatkin

Stairway to Seven
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
2,494
Reaction Score
9,781
Did you edit this and take Pujols name out? I was going to tell you why the Pujols contract was always a terrible one.
I did. I was thinking Kawhi and wrote Pujols. Guess I had huge Angels contracts on my mind.
You could argue Pujols was defensible given his performance, but it was also clear as day at the time he could never live up to those numbers for the duration
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
73
Reaction Score
310
Here’s an early candidate: Wayne Garland, 1977 Cleveland Indians. First 10-year contract in MLB history. Twenty game winner with Baltimore in 1976, then 13-19 in 1977. Next four years 15-29; then out of baseball.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
14,159
Reaction Score
95,339
Every year, I post about Bonilla's contract because every year (and thread like this) gets it wrong.

1) Every team has deferred deals just like this one. Ken Griffey Jr was the 4th highest paid Red last season (2023) and gets 3.6m a year.

2) That deal, at the time, used the saved cash to sign Mike Hampton, Derek Bell and Todd Zeile, who all helped the Mets to the National League pennant in 2000. That alone is worth it.
And when Mike Hampton walked in FA after his one year with the Mets, the comp pick they received was possibly the greatest position player in team history before his injuries David Wright
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
424
Reaction Score
1,858
In all seriousness, Anthony Rendon got paid $245M/7yrs from the Angels in 2020. He has played 52, 58, 47, 43, and 57 games in the 5 seasons since.

Mike Trout got like $450M/12yrs and has played basically the same amount of games as Rendon.

Basically any big contract the Angels give out will be a contender for the worst of all time
Angels deserve their own sub thread on this. they gave Josh Hamilton 125 million and he did nothing for them. they gave a very old Puhols 240 million.
 

McLovin

Gangstas, what's up?
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
2,965
Reaction Score
18,878
While I generally think the posters of the Boneyard often speak out of their butts when it comes to sports, myself included, this thread made me realize that any of us could be as successful, if not more successful, than pretty much any professional GM. And that’s pretty wild.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
11,386
Reaction Score
30,818
Angels deserve their own sub thread on this. they gave Josh Hamilton 125 million and he did nothing for them. they gave a very old Puhols 240 million.
Absolutely. Plus they have Mike Trout, supposedly our generational Mickey Mantle, who's done absolutely nothing for them.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
50,272
Reaction Score
176,883
Absolutely. Plus they have Mike Trout, supposedly our generational Mickey Mantle, who's done absolutely nothing for them.
3× MVP with them, 11× all-star, 9× silver slugger.

Not much he can do about the rest of the team sucking and himself always getting injured.

It's wild they've had Trout, Pujols, Ohtani, and Hamilton and the team has always blown. That's easily four of the ten most talented players of the past twenty years.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
1,451
Reaction Score
3,807
3× MVP with them, 11× all-star, 9× silver slugger.

Not much he can do about the rest of the team sucking and himself always getting injured.

It's wild they've had Trout, Pujols, Ohtani, and Hamilton and the team has always blown. That's easily four of the ten most talented players of the past twenty years.
Just shows you baseball is nothing like the NBA or playing the QB position in the NFL- one or even two great players don’t guarantee any type of consistent success.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2018
Messages
667
Reaction Score
2,222
The blame lies with John Henry and FSG. They would have had 2 years of luxury tax penalties but would have come out the other side after Price’s contract expired. They’re cheap. That’s the bottom line. There’s no excuse to not spend on a frontline starting pitcher this off-season and the fan base is definitely paying attention.
Yeah clearly trying to save money to subsidize their other investments. But the Sox did spend frontline money on a starter. It just so happens they spent it on giolito and Hendricks, a starter with a 4.90 era the past 2 years (who ultimately bailed Breslow out of the embarrassment he would’ve been by getting hurt) and a reliever who we knew wouldn’t pitch this year and is coming off both Tommy John and cancer.

Breslow is one of the worst GMs/BPOs in baseball. Believe it or not, he simultaneously subtracted from the MLB roster and farm system, while adding on payroll. Between all his additions, he has something like a -3 WAR (despite trading a dozen prospects at the trade deadline) and that’s not counting who he’s traded away. For comparison, Verdugo has a 0.9 WAR and sale has a 5.8 WAR. If the sox kept Bloom, they’d be contenders in the AL East or at the very least, firmly in a wild card spot.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,364
Reaction Score
21,941
That is around the range the Sox reportedly offered before being traded. Again I do think he wanted to go to free agency to help the players and that it probably would’ve taken $35M-40M a year for 8+ years for him to sign an extension before Covid. In the end, the David price and Chris sale deals made offering that much almost impossible. They’d be committing ~$90M to those 3 players coming off a disappointing year they weren’t really close to making the playoffs, with very little talent in the farm system. Kind of similar to the Yankees last year, except without one of the top farm systems to go out and make a Juan Soto like trade or even just supplement at trade deadlines. In retrospect, yes mookie still would’ve been worth that, but I don’t blame the Sox for moving him.

I think Bloom should’ve taken on some salary dumps in those years after trading Mookie (look for one of those Carl Crawford / Adrian Gonzalez type trades that the dodgers/sox also made except be on the other end of it), or ate the Price contract to get some better prospects in the trade. But clearly Red Sox ownership wanted to cut payroll so that wasn’t happening.
The Red Sox weren't willing to give Betts a LT contract (12 years) so he didn't sign with the Red Sox and got traded to the Dodgers who gave him a 12 year deal.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2023
Messages
1,877
Reaction Score
9,532
Yeah clearly trying to save money to subsidize their other investments. But the Sox did spend frontline money on a starter. It just so happens they spent it on giolito and Hendricks, a starter with a 4.90 era the past 2 years (who ultimately bailed Breslow out of the embarrassment he would’ve been by getting hurt) and a reliever who we knew wouldn’t pitch this year and is coming off both Tommy John and cancer.

Breslow is one of the worst GMs/BPOs in baseball. Believe it or not, he simultaneously subtracted from the MLB roster and farm system, while adding on payroll. Between all his additions, he has something like a -3 WAR (despite trading a dozen prospects at the trade deadline) and that’s not counting who he’s traded away. For comparison, Verdugo has a 0.9 WAR and sale has a 5.8 WAR. If the sox kept Bloom, they’d be contenders in the AL East or at the very least, firmly in a wild card spot.
Agree with a fair amount of this but Giolito was not paid like a frontline starter. He was paid more like a #3. If the Red Sox sign Corbin Burnes, I’ll be impressed.
 

Online statistics

Members online
53
Guests online
1,495
Total visitors
1,548

Forum statistics

Threads
159,735
Messages
4,202,409
Members
10,073
Latest member
CTEspn


.
Top Bottom