Doesn't really count for this thread. The question is, "Watching the Browns vs Cowboys, it got me thinking about the worst contracts teams have given out."FOX paying Brady $375M for 10 years as a commentator has to be up there...and I say that as a Pats fan. Just a remarkable waste of money. The NFL is a ratings monster no matter who is commentating in the booth. Adding Brady does absolutely nothing. They'd get a better ROI by giving that money to Taylor Swift to be in the booth every week lmao
The Angels are such a poorly run organizationYou can definitely add Albert Pujols to that list. 10 years, $254M. Over the 10 years he averaged 118 games, .256 batting average and 22.2 home runs.
Speaking of the Nats, what about Stephen Strasburg's contract? 7 years and $245 million and he made just eight starts and pitched 31⅓ innings after signing his free-agent contract. That's pretty bad.Jason Werth did practically nothing for the Nats. I saw him a few times rehabbing at A ball when he was there.
I would have offered $31-32 million per year for 10 years early and if he turned it down, so be it. On a WAR basis, I thought he was worth that. They would have struggled with the luxury tax for a couple of years, but then would have come out the other side just fine.They supposedly offered Mookie $300M but Mookie wanted to go to free agency to help the players. Mookie later said they didn’t offer him that. I tend to side with the Sox at least offering in that $300M range, and Mookie only signing the extension with the dodgers after Covid hit and there was a lot of uncertainty about what the upcoming free agents would get that offseason. No proof, that’s just what I suspect.
They did save a lot of money on David prices contract, about 50% of the remaining contract was included in that mookie trade. The trade was at least better than the sale trade…
Plus all the draft picksThe Broncos paying washed up Russell Wilson $64 Million and then letting him go to the Steelers while still having to pay him whatever the remainder is on that contract.
Sale’s extension was wayyyyy worse than price. The guy turned into balsa wood. Before they shipped him out this year of course. Price had far more to do with that WS win than Sale and they were at least able to dump him sooner.Carl Crawford's was pretty bad in Boston. Jason Werth did practically nothing for the Nats. I saw him a few times rehabbing at A ball when he was there.
For me, as a Sox fan, I still have to go with David Price. I know he had a decent World Series the one year, but it was a big contract given to a guy with a lot of innings on his arm and many believe helped make ownership hesitant to give out long large contracts after that and may have helped the Sox to decide to low ball Mookie Betts and send him to the other coast.
Mookie was NEVER staying in Boston. PeriodThey supposedly offered Mookie $300M but Mookie wanted to go to free agency to help the players. Mookie later said they didn’t offer him that. I tend to side with the Sox at least offering in that $300M range, and Mookie only signing the extension with the dodgers after Covid hit and there was a lot of uncertainty about what the upcoming free agents would get that offseason. No proof, that’s just what I suspect.
They did save a lot of money on David prices contract, about 50% of the remaining contract was included in that mookie trade. The trade was at least better than the sale trade…
Ryan Leaf - Brian Bosworth - nuff said??
The contract wasn't a totally terrible idea. Their belief in Madoff was ridiculous.July 1st.
Some great ones on thus list, but Kwahi was one of the 1st to pop into my mind after the obvious ones.Currently the Kwahi Leonard contract, does he ever play? In hindsight obviously the right deal.
They like paying UConn guys. Rip really worked out for them. I wouldn't say Ben, Charlie, and Andre worked out for them.Some of these bad contracts I hate to say are UConn alums, the Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva Pistons contracts.
Daniel jones is the last remnantMeatheaded simpleton Dave Gettleman's contract to run the NY Giants. He set the team back 8 years in his 4 years on the job.
More destructive than any player contract, ever.
Worst contract or greatest agents?Watching the Browns vs Cowboys, it got me thinking about the worst contracts teams have given out. It’s relatively early, but might DeShaun Watson’s be? Bobby Bonilla and Pablo Sandoval might be contenders. What other ones come to mind?
Agreed and what made it even worst is there were no other bidders, and Boras still was able to talk the Oriolos into increasing their offer.The Orioles contract with Chris Davis has to be on the list.