storrsroars
Exiled in Pittsburgh
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2012
- Messages
- 20,870
- Reaction Score
- 44,579
Lucked out with first word, thought I had excellent chance for a 2, couldn't miss on 3.
SLOPE
PEONY
EPOXY
SLOPE
PEONY
EPOXY
My first, and only, loss happened the same way. The grieving eventually dissipates.That moment on line 3 when you realize there are at least 4 correct answers and you've only got three more guesses.
Now 43-1. First loss.
View attachment 74926
At least you had eliminated pound, round and hound. I think I had six words left with 3 guesses and just lucked out.That moment on line 3 when you realize there are at least 4 correct answers and you've only got three more guesses.
Now 43-1. First loss.
View attachment 74926
Broke my 67 day streak today. My last 5 guesses had _OUND.My second loss:
View attachment 74933
When I’ve been in the position, where there are more letters than guesses, I‘ve “thrown“ away a turn using a word that uses as many of the potential letters as possible.The generally accepted practice is that you have to use the letters (and positions) that were identified in your previous guesses, on subsequent guesses.
So you get to a situation, described above, where you have more letters that could create a word then you have guesses left. (call them guess letters) Would it be cheating if only in this case, you disregard the letters previously identified, and try a word that has as many of the guess letters as possible ?
The generally accepted practice is that you have to use the letters (and positions) that were identified in your previous guesses, on subsequent guesses.
So you get to a situation, described above, where you have more letters that could create a word then you have guesses left. (call them guess letters) Would it be cheating if only in this case, you disregard the letters previously identified, and try a word that has as many of the guess letters as possible ?
I don't think it's cheating; there is a mode that will force you to play that way if you want. Otherwise it's up to you. I don't do it simply because I don't want to burn a turn, and I'm not afraid of failing to solve it on any given day.When I’ve been in the position, where there are more letters than guesses, I‘ve “thrown“ away a turn using a word that uses as many of the potential letters as possible.
I have used both. The only "fail" that I've had was because I had "hard mode" turned on and it handcuffed me with word choices. I then turned it off and police myself on reusing grey letters.The generally accepted practice is that you have to use the letters (and positions) that were identified in your previous guesses, on subsequent guesses.
So you get to a situation, described above, where you have more letters that could create a word then you have guesses left. (call them guess letters) Would it be cheating if only in this case, you disregard the letters previously identified, and try a word that has as many of the guess letters as possible ?
That could work, certainly. In my case today, had I plugged in "walks" in line 5, I'd only have the "f" left and I'd get it in 6. But I'm kinda like 8893 in that I'll only burn a line if I've only got one letter and haven't hit its location after two tries.When I’ve been in the position, where there are more letters than guesses, I‘ve “thrown“ away a turn using a word that uses as many of the potential letters as possible.
No. Don't even know what it is. Guess I'll have to go and look.That could work, certainly. In my case today, had I plugged in "walks" in line 5, I'd only have the "f" left and I'd get it in 6. But I'm kinda like 8893 in that I'll only burn a line if I've only got one letter and haven't hit its location after two tries.
@JavaMan - Do you do Quordle? I'm only 78-13 over there including practice games. Much harder game, IMHO.