WNBA Collective Bargaining | Page 2 | The Boneyard

WNBA Collective Bargaining

I believe that a meeting last week gave a hopeful hint (who was in the meeting vs. who usually is and retracting that snarky no-housing proposal) that the CBA talks have finally gone beyond Engelbert’s initial remit (that resulted in the inevitable impasse on the proposals). Only Owners can resolve the impasse.
  • The impasse shows the players association’s and the WNBA’s claims about the impasse (in above link) can both be true but the WNBA’s are true by pulling a “fast one” (below, exacerbated by their closed books).
While the impasse was always couched in terms of revenue sharing/ salary cap, it was rooted in certain revenue streams that the WNBA considers, because of its ownership structure, exempt from revenue sharing/ salary cap. The impasse, then, is really all about the ownership structure.

Currently, the WNBA doesn’t (substantially) share the following player-created value with players:
  • (a) the unrealized gain (realized through sale) &1 in astronomical franchise valuations;
  • (b) the very large expansion fees;
  • (c) revenue streams (e.g. merchandise sales) that must go through a Ruth Goldberg Contraption to determine the slice, if any, of the slice, if any, that will be shared.
&1 This is the same as the NBA not sharing the full economic value of the media rights deals.
 
I wish that a deal would have been reached sooner. Year 30. It is wild because many folks thought that the W would not make it past Year 5. When the original Portland team folded, many folks were saying how the W would fold as well. Here we are in Year 30. Pretty awesome. Now we just have to figure out the steps for a season.

I just hope that there are plans in place for a relatively smooth transition into the season. The expansion draft for starters. How about when the season starts. Usually, the W starts in May. Will they push for a May start time or push for a start time in June? Will the WNBA draft start the week after the NCAA WBB Final Four. So many questions.
 
The NY Liberty owner and Rizzotti are Engelbert’s nannies. [Article]
  • see also Post #26 for context on the last two paragraphs.
IMG_0287.jpeg
 
.-.
Owners still playing Chicken on the revenue sharing issue. It's My Hope that the players hold arm on gross rather than net:

But the parties still need to agree on a new revenue sharing system.

Jackson reiterated Friday that a system "tied to revenue in a meaningful way" remains a priority for the players.

 
Owners still playing Chicken on the revenue sharing issue. It's My Hope that the players hold arm on gross rather than net:

But the parties still need to agree on a new revenue sharing system.

Jackson reiterated Friday that a system "tied to revenue in a meaningful way" remains a priority for the players.

I still think that in order for it to be gross, they need to open the books. And I don't see that happenin', and if the W negotiators think the players would go for it, they think very highly of their ability to hoodwink. Would you trust the WNBA management to give you a real number for something with no evidence whatsoever?
 
Owners still playing Chicken on the revenue sharing issue. It's My Hope that the players hold arm on gross rather than net:

But the parties still need to agree on a new revenue sharing system.

Jackson reiterated Friday that a system "tied to revenue in a meaningful way" remains a priority for the players.

“Contrived Predicament Bargaining” is not an actual term, but it describes Engelbert’s/ Silver’s strategy.
  • There have been inexplicable lollygagging lulls on Engelbert’s part in responding to player union offers since the last All-Star break when players were disappointed at the WNBA’s initial response;
  • Game Theory-wise, it is a legitimate strategy for a non-cooperative player who also likes a season to begin, but likes to keep certain advantages (closed books, untouchable revenue streams);
  • Doing close to nothing (there were only two articles of agreement, since as late as December), “movement” only coming very lately, and announcing an arbitrary deadline to the non-cooperative counterparty is par for the course for Engelbert (as well as her feeding various gas-lighting media narratives);
  • It is not lost on the players who have authorized the union to be able to call a strike;
  • Ogwumike’s “negotiating in good faith” line has been uttered in different ways, notably above and in the January lull of the negotiations.
  • There was a recent meeting that Engelbert did not attend but the NY Liberty owner did (see post 26), where the players presumably lambasted Engelbert and her team airing their grievances; the recent tone of negotiations and the NY Liberty owner’s ongoing involvement are hopeful signs.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,685
Messages
4,534,933
Members
10,408
Latest member
Bigo-Nel


Top Bottom