- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 515
- Reaction Score
- 920
I am not a football fan. I pay very distant and inconsistent attention to the sport at college or pro level. It is the main reason I was and am so pi**ed at all of the upheaval in conference alignments. But that aside, there was an interesting article in the Waterbury Republican-American this morning by Ed Daigneault(the local Horde guy) evaluating UConn and the ACC. Despite the fact that I have a print subscription, their website (which I "should" have unlimited access to) is a pain in the a**. So I will give you the gist of it.
(1.)UConn, according to his sources in the ACC, is the clear frontrunner although
Louisville has gained ground.
(2.)Florida State,Clemson and Georgia Tech have voiced their opposition to UConn based
on our football program, in their opinion, doing nothing to improve the quality of
football in the ACC.
(3.)No decision is likely until after the ACC university presidents meet on December 1st.
(4.)An ACC source said that the league is considering the possibility of inviting
UConn,Louisville and either Cincinnati or South Florida if Florida State and Clemson
leave. But that is far down the list of contingency plans.
What concerns me is that we visit #19(9-1) Louisville this weekend. If Pasqualoni's team gets trashed and that is fresh on the minds of the ACC presidents meeting Dec.1, do we lose the pole position? I am also putting this in the context of ACC snobbery re: academics; and our basketball program still, at least occasionally, getting media attention re:APR and prohibition from BE and NCAA tournaments. I think it may be too much to overcome and I don't have a good feeling about it. At least Edsall's teams won in the BE and have some bowl hardware. Pasqualoni was quoted that all fans should rest assured that everything that can be done is being done re: behind the scenes work with the ACC. I have a lot of faith in Susan Herbst; but, we may be a bridge too far. I need some feedback from you folks here who are more knowledgeable re: football and other influences. It would be embarrassing if, despite all of JC's and the program's success, we get left holding the bag.
GO HUSKIES!!! BEAT THE SEAWOLVES!!!
(1.)UConn, according to his sources in the ACC, is the clear frontrunner although
Louisville has gained ground.
(2.)Florida State,Clemson and Georgia Tech have voiced their opposition to UConn based
on our football program, in their opinion, doing nothing to improve the quality of
football in the ACC.
(3.)No decision is likely until after the ACC university presidents meet on December 1st.
(4.)An ACC source said that the league is considering the possibility of inviting
UConn,Louisville and either Cincinnati or South Florida if Florida State and Clemson
leave. But that is far down the list of contingency plans.
What concerns me is that we visit #19(9-1) Louisville this weekend. If Pasqualoni's team gets trashed and that is fresh on the minds of the ACC presidents meeting Dec.1, do we lose the pole position? I am also putting this in the context of ACC snobbery re: academics; and our basketball program still, at least occasionally, getting media attention re:APR and prohibition from BE and NCAA tournaments. I think it may be too much to overcome and I don't have a good feeling about it. At least Edsall's teams won in the BE and have some bowl hardware. Pasqualoni was quoted that all fans should rest assured that everything that can be done is being done re: behind the scenes work with the ACC. I have a lot of faith in Susan Herbst; but, we may be a bridge too far. I need some feedback from you folks here who are more knowledgeable re: football and other influences. It would be embarrassing if, despite all of JC's and the program's success, we get left holding the bag.
GO HUSKIES!!! BEAT THE SEAWOLVES!!!