- Joined
- Nov 21, 2012
- Messages
- 4,634
- Reaction Score
- 9,910
I agree this league should be looking at travel partners. Say UCONN And Temple play Houston and SMU on Thursday and then UConn plays SMU on Saturday while Temple plays Houston.I want out of this conference just as bad as anyone but this move makes sense to me if the following happens...
League goes to 2 Divisions and 16 total games. East: Uconn, Cincy, Temple, ECU, UCF, USF play each team twice and West: SMU, UH, Memphis, Tulane, Tulsa, Wichita, play each team 1 time. Opens up 2 game slots for us to play a couple more local teams and cuts down on travel. My biggest issue with this conference is the crazy travel, asking our players to fly to Tulsa on a Wed night to play a game is just stupid and a no win situation. Our games are usually Wed-Sat or Thurs-Sun. We should travel in "road trips" to USF/UCF every year and play Thurs/Sat and have two groups of SMU/UH and Tulsa/Wichita that we do 1 "road trip" a year on Thurs/Sat then 1 final road game to the Tulane or Memphis. Just my 2 cents on this horrible conference.
The league needs to ensure that UConn--and the other top teams--gets good teams twice. It helps RPI and helps build resumes.I want out of this conference just as bad as anyone but this move makes sense to me if the following happens...
League goes to 2 Divisions and 16 total games. East: Uconn, Cincy, Temple, ECU, UCF, USF play each team twice and West: SMU, UH, Memphis, Tulane, Tulsa, Wichita, play each team 1 time. Opens up 2 game slots for us to play a couple more local teams and cuts down on travel. My biggest issue with this conference is the crazy travel, asking our players to fly to Tulsa on a Wed night to play a game is just stupid and a no win situation. Our games are usually Wed-Sat or Thurs-Sun. We should travel in "road trips" to USF/UCF every year and play Thurs/Sat and have two groups of SMU/UH and Tulsa/Wichita that we do 1 "road trip" a year on Thurs/Sat then 1 final road game to the Tulane or Memphis. Just my 2 cents on this horrible conference.
I want out of this conference just as bad as anyone but this move makes sense to me if the following happens...
League goes to 2 Divisions and 16 total games. East: Uconn, Cincy, Temple, ECU, UCF, USF play each team twice and West: SMU, UH, Memphis, Tulane, Tulsa, Wichita, play each team 1 time. Opens up 2 game slots for us to play a couple more local teams and cuts down on travel. My biggest issue with this conference is the crazy travel, asking our players to fly to Tulsa on a Wed night to play a game is just stupid and a no win situation. Our games are usually Wed-Sat or Thurs-Sun. We should travel in "road trips" to USF/UCF every year and play Thurs/Sat and have two groups of SMU/UH and Tulsa/Wichita that we do 1 "road trip" a year on Thurs/Sat then 1 final road game to the Tulane or Memphis. Just my 2 cents on this horrible conference.
Yeah I get that, but it also opens up 2 games that we can schedule against top out of conference teams. I'd rather try to get non conference games against top tier teams than playing Wichita State and SMU twice, besides, most likely see at least 1 of those teams, if not both in the Conf Tourney.My biggest issue is RPI hits with bogus teams at the bottom. Best teams playing each other twice is absolutely imperative.
Wich State will be a good addition for the short term, and hopefully we're only in this dumpster fire conference short term (1 more year)
I'm strapped in for 20.Prepare yourself for 5.
Are you an ECU fan?So will this now cement us in the lower half of the league?
no. Why shoot ourselves in the foot for two more local body bag games and a crappier SOS. Playing 6 of our 16 games (almost 40%) against the dross that is ECU, UCF, and USF makes me want to puke. What is the point of adding WSU if we aren't playing them twice almost every year.I want out of this conference just as bad as anyone but this move makes sense to me if the following happens...
League goes to 2 Divisions and 16 total games. East: Uconn, Cincy, Temple, ECU, UCF, USF play each team twice and West: SMU, UH, Memphis, Tulane, Tulsa, Wichita, play each team 1 time. Opens up 2 game slots for us to play a couple more local teams and cuts down on travel. My biggest issue with this conference is the crazy travel, asking our players to fly to Tulsa on a Wed night to play a game is just stupid and a no win situation. Our games are usually Wed-Sat or Thurs-Sun. We should travel in "road trips" to USF/UCF every year and play Thurs/Sat and have two groups of SMU/UH and Tulsa/Wichita that we do 1 "road trip" a year on Thurs/Sat then 1 final road game to the Tulane or Memphis. Just my 2 cents on this horrible conference.
Should have been clearer, by local I mean Villanova, Cuse or any big program this side of the Mississippi that I'd have any interest in watching play, didn't mean picking up QPac or Central.no. Why shoot ourselves in the foot for two more local body bag games and a crappier SOS. Playing 6 of our 16 games (almost 40%) against the dross that is ECU, UCF, and USF makes me want to puke. What is the point of adding WSU if we aren't playing them twice almost every year.
18 games is a good number for scheduling purposes, and we should DEMAND that we play Cincy, WSU, Memphis, Temple, and SMU twice every year.
Are you an ECU fan?