4-8 Doesn't get P fired? Sportstart is right Vowelguy..you DEFINITELY need to put that crack pipe down!!! No bowl means he is FIRED...less than 8 wins...FIRED!!! This isn't Manuel's guy..he has ZERO loyalty to him! And an empty stadium week after week has McHugh losing P's number pretty quick now. Face FACTS...Face REALITY the announcement that this staff is done will be given by the Memphis game at the latest, most likely following the Temple or Rutgers game.Again I say: is there any evidence that the powers that be are very unhappy with PP?
....
Temple, USF, Buffalo, and Memphis are all bad teams. It is not inconceivable that UConn wins those 4 games. Does 4-8 get PP fired? I wouldnt be surprised if it doesnt.
Under his watch, UConn athletics have gone from national power to midmajor disaster. The only way he leaves UConn is if he gets fired. Would you hire him as your AD if you were a P5 school after seeing him get pummeled by the ACC?
...less than 8 wins...FIRED!!!
You lost all credibility with that statement.
There's NO way that WM fires him after a 7-5 season.
There's no way he wins 7.
I agree.
But we were talking about what it would take for PP to get fired. It sure as hell won't be 7-5, and probably wouldn't be 6-6 either.
You guys all assume Warde Manuel is competent when you say PP is getting fired at the end of the season.
I think the decision has already been made.
And you're basing this on .... ?
We're back to my original question: is there ANY evidence of displeasure from the powers that be?
I'm just not convinced Warde Manuel is a competent AD.
You lost all credibility with that statement.
There's NO way that WM fires him after a 7-5 season.
Let's turn Vowelguy's question on you...If Pasqualoni goes 7-6 he should be fired. But the key word is "should." I'm not convinced Manuel will actually do so. He's a horrible AD, so just because it's logical doesn't mean he will do it.
Only a fool would keep Pasqualoni around with fewer than 8 wins this year. Which is exactly why Manuel might do it.
And you're basing this on .... ?
If Pasqualoni goes 7-6 he should be fired. But the key word is "should." I'm not convinced Manuel will actually do so. He's a horrible AD, so just because it's logical doesn't mean he will do it.
Only a fool would keep Pasqualoni around with fewer than 8 wins this year. Which is exactly why Manuel might do it.
While he let PP stay after 2 bad years, it's not unusual to let a bad coach have a 3rd year.
People are in such a microwave society, yes I said microwave, and don't realize Hathaway gets the full blame here.
Warde knows football. If he believes that PP has lost the team, and that they really won't play for him, I can see him giving TJ a shot after Michigan. If he sees the effort is there and the execution is not, I think PP stays, and is fired after the season.
If I was WM, I'd look at it like this. I don't know what I have in TJ. Can he be a head coach? How badly do I want to find out? Is the team more likely to win if i make a change? There is nothing to be gained from keeping PP on other than consistency. I doubt that if PP is canned at year end, Weist gets the job. There will be full search. Would Weist take the job on an interim basis? We don't know. Does he see any upside in that?
The truth is, there is more to being a head college coach than the plays called on the field (i.e. recruiting, delegating, public relations). I think if Coach Weist is tabbed an interim tag, he will undoubtedly be included in the nation-wide search.Warde knows football. If he believes that PP has lost the team, and that they really won't play for him, I can see him giving TJ a shot after Michigan. If he sees the effort is there and the execution is not, I think PP stays, and is fired after the season.
If I was WM, I'd look at it like this. I don't know what I have in TJ. Can he be a head coach? How badly do I want to find out? Is the team more likely to win if i make a change? There is nothing to be gained from keeping PP on other than consistency. I doubt that if PP is canned at year end, Weist gets the job. There will be full search. Would Weist take the job on an interim basis? We don't know. Does he see any upside in that?
Warde knows football. If he believes that PP has lost the team, and that they really won't play for him, I can see him giving TJ a shot after Michigan. If he sees the effort is there and the execution is not, I think PP stays, and is fired after the season.
If I was WM, I'd look at it like this. I don't know what I have in TJ. Can he be a head coach? How badly do I want to find out? Is the team more likely to win if i make a change? There is nothing to be gained from keeping PP on other than consistency. I doubt that if PP is canned at year end, Weist gets the job. There will be full search. Would Weist take the job on an interim basis? We don't know. Does he see any upside in that?
What's the upside to being consistently bad?
After the product that has been on the field these past 2+ seasons there is no way he brings him back...especially after the start of this year! As for losing all credibility...I'm not the one who thinks P keeps his job with a 4 win season! Again like Sportstart said get off the crack pipe!You lost all credibility with that statement.
There's NO way that WM fires him after a 7-5 season.