nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 46,349
- Reaction Score
- 38,896
You're smarter than this, even though you work very hard to make it appear otherwise.
I'll use Houston as Exhibit A. Once Phi Slamma Jamma moved on they spent three decades accomplishing absolutely nothing. They started building again once they joined the AAC (even made a final four as a member), got invited to the B-12 and have been one of the five or six best programs in the country post-covid.
My question is in the present tense. If being in the AAC is such a good option, why aren't its current schools doing better?
As I point out several times in this thread, the AAC is and was a SOUTHERN mid major. It was a terrible conference for UConn. Pre House/NIL/Transfer Portal, UConn had absolutely no competitive advantage for recruiting the South in football. We were literally the end of the trough on talent from the better high school recruiting regions in the south, but we also couldn't really recruit the northeast effectively either because we had so few games scheduled against northern opponents since we were locked into a schedule with East Carolina and Tulsa. Back then access to better recruiting regions was life and death in football. Edsall 2.0 was a terrible coach for a mid major football program because even before the Transfer Portal, we were going to have to depend on transfers. It does make my point how bad the AAC was for UConn when I have to point out that we had the wrong coach for a mid major.
For basketball, prior to House/NIL/Transfer Portal, being a mid major outpost program far away from the rest of the league was a death sentence, and it kind of was within the major programs too. The Big East was eating our lunch in recruiting in the northeast, and we were losing transfers to major programs. Enoch, Durham, Akinjo and Matthews and Ashton-Langford all went to major programs, and Jackson went to New Mexico, a top mid-major. It was difficult to recruit against majors with our schedule because of the low opponent quality and heavy travel. Even then, if Gilbert doesn't hurt his shoulder, we might have been able to hang on competitively. Self-reporting violations to get out of a coach’s contract didn’t do us any favors either. Hurley didn’t have his first big recruiting class until after the Big East move was announced, and as I have said before, it is a virtual certainty that Hurley knew UConn was joining the Big East when he chose UConn over Pitt.
Houston was a former conference mate of much of the Big 12, and was a better fit in the AAC. UCF and Cincinnati were also better fits in a southern mid major, so their problems were not as bad as our problems. Even then, they were not exactly crushing it in the AAC. UCF had a couple of good football seasons in 2017 and 2018, but was sliding back to mediocrity when it was added to the Big 12, and basketball was and remained pretty bad until this year. Cincinnati football got hot at the right time. Cincinnati hoops was mired in mediocrity. Houston football was not great, and basketball was leaning heavily on transfers and had the benefit of a future HOF coach who they never would have gotten if not for one of the worst “Show Cause” penalties ever imposed on a coach.
The point I have made and will continue to make is that UConn would have been a better expansion option if it had been in the Big East since 2013. When the Big 12 announcement was made in September 2021, UConn was coming off a horrendous run in football with one bowl in 11 years, and had not shown any of the benefits of being in the Big East for basketball yet. UConn had just made its first NCAA tournament since 2016. BYU was always going to be the first addition for the Big 12, and Cincinnati and Houston were basically the Big 12 taking the best football and basketball program available that year because it needed to move fast. The fact that UConn was passed over for Houston, UCF and Cincinnati shows just how much damage the AAC had done to our athletic program.