Jeez, you can’t even get one like even when you’re the OP in a thread. There are some strange birds on this board and not one person ever agrees with anything you post. Why waste your breath anymore?I see hundreds of posts talking about how much better this team will be once experienced players that Hurley has been coaching for two years are gone, and kids from high school that were playing against 5'10 guards and 6'3 centers show up. Do posters think that Hurley is so terrible at player development that he is incapable of coaching players up, and that the team would be better off taking some 18 year old kid that has only had high school coaching?
Is there a negative correlation between exposure to Hurley's coaching and player improvement? If this is true, should we replace the entire roster every year with freshmen?
As for UConn its way too early to know. Got to wait for Gaffney's Sr. year to me. He will be a perfect case study. The current roster is not totally his, and some of the veteran players are too familiar with 'losing'.
So Hurley coaches a guy for 1-2 seasons of his entire life and now he's fully responsible for his poor play?So Hurley doesn’t coach a guy for 1-2 seasons and now he has full immunity to their poor play?
Jeez, you can’t even get one like even when you’re the OP in a thread. There are some strange birds on this board and not one person ever agrees with anything you post. Why waste your breath anymore?
Please just stopShould I start a crowd pleasing thread like "Josh Carlton SUCKS!!!!"?
At least you'd be responding to something somebody actually said.Should I start a crowd pleasing thread like "Josh Carlton SUCKS!!!!"?
It just says a lot when nobody ever agrees with you. It’s ok for you to always be critical of the coach but not for posters to be critical of a player’s game apparently.Should I start a crowd pleasing thread like "Josh Carlton SUCKS!!!!"?
There's critique and then there's nelson. Instead of making a point and backing it up with reason and logic, he creates strawmen, responds to arguments people aren't making, ignores the most salient posts. All with a smugness that defies logic.It is not too early to judge coaching ability; which has been lacking. It is way too early to talk replacing him; which no one is saying.
The fact this coach is immune to critique to many here is laughable and strange.
Jeez, you can’t even get one like even when you’re the OP in a thread. There are some strange birds on this board and not one person ever agrees with anything you post. Why waste your breath anymore?
It just says a lot when nobody ever agrees with you. It’s ok for you to always be critical of the coach but not for posters to be critical of a player’s game apparently.
Haha ok Waylon Smithers.You aren't keeping up. You should sit this thread out.
Perhaps he needs to. Perhaps it doesn't add up to 10. I haven't counted. Have you?The dude hates Hurley, I get it, we all get it
Does he need to start 10 threads per week about it?
No thanks. That would displease me.Should I start a crowd pleasing thread like "Josh Carlton SUCKS!!!!"?
If only there waa some way to Ignore him or even just any particular thread that he starts...especially the ones that have no value whatsoever and would be better off treated like they don't even exist.There's critique and then there's nelson. Instead of making a point and backing it up with reason and logic, he creates strawmen, responds to arguments people aren't making, ignores the most salient posts. All with a smugness that defies logic.
I see hundreds of posts talking about how much better this team will be once experienced players that Hurley has been coaching for two years are gone, and kids from high school that were playing against 5'10 guards and 6'3 centers show up. Do posters think that Hurley is so terrible at player development that he is incapable of coaching players up, and that the team would be better off taking some 18 year old kid that has only had high school coaching?
Is there a negative correlation between exposure to Hurley's coaching and player improvement? If this is true, should we replace the entire roster every year with freshmen?
Is there a negative correlation between exposure to Hurley's coaching and player improvement? If this is true, should we replace the entire roster every year with freshmen?
Don't lump everyone into the nobody category. Obviously you haven't considered the fact that some posters don't feel the urge to say anything about nelson's comments when he might be right. There are far too many of you on this board that are not capable of being objective when he posts anything. You all know who you are......It just says a lot when nobody ever agrees with you. It’s ok for you to always be critical of the coach but not for posters to be critical of a player’s game apparently.
Don't lump everyone into the nobody category. Obviously you haven't considered the fact that some posters don't feel the urge to say anything about nelson's comments when he might be right. There are far too many of you on this board that are not capable of being objective when he posts anything. You all know who you are......
Should I start a crowd pleasing thread like "Josh Carlton SUCKS!!!!"?
Not at all what I am saying. Was I challenging Hurley in the OP?
"Is there a negative correlation between exposure to Hurley's coaching and player improvement? If this is true, should we replace the entire roster every year with freshmen? "
This qualifies as challenging Hurley in the OP.
He is among the least insightful posters on this site. Most everyone can see that.