Why a yearly Thanksgiving series vs UMASS makes sense | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Why a yearly Thanksgiving series vs UMASS makes sense

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's my point on "rivalries" With the exception of some natural ones that go back 100 years, Harvard-Yale, Army Navy, Michigan-Ohio State, its really not possible to ordain them. BC-Clemson was supposed to be the ACC match up for the Eagles. Nobody much went for it. And we came from a conference that couldn't seem to figure out to take advantage of the ones that actually existed, in fact seem to go to great lengths sometimes to NOT schedule them for rivalry weekend. Rivalries develop on their own.

Lots of ways you can describe what "rivalry" is. For me, for it to exist, there needs to be two things - consistency in scheduling, and mutual fan interest. Yale Columbia games have been played every year that Yale Harvard games get played, but Yale Columbia isn't drawing 60k into the Yale Bowl of people that are Yale and Columbia fans. It's also a much different thing in the northeast, than something in the South. You can get huge 'rivalry' games in the south, where the entire 65,000+ stadium has fans for only one of the programs in the seats - vast majority. That kind of environment doesn't exist in northern football where things are closer together. Look at Army Navy - Harvard Yale - Michigan Ohio-State -etc. and you get arenas that are packed with fans from both sides.

UConn football had rivals for many, many years. The fan bases were small, northeastern based groups of 10k-15k people at most. We gave that level of football up to upgrade b/w 1997-2000, and we now have a 40,000 seat venue waiting to be expanded and are scheduling whoever we can regionally and nationally that fits what we are.

Because of the way things turned out for UCONN from 1997 through current, with the constantly changing conference membership every 2-3 years at most, come 2014...we simply do not have anything in football scheduling that can be even remotely be called a "rivalry", and what we have here with young student Drew, is a 21 year old kid that has recognized that is something that UCONN football doesn't have, and wants it.

Looking at the 2014 home schedule, off the top of my head, I don't think we've played a single program we have at home in 2014, more than 8 times EVER, I think Cincy and Temple qualify for the most games played, which isn't a lot for either, especially if you only consider post 2000 years, most of them are first or second time. We've had schedules each year since 1997, that are similar in such characteristics - programs with very little history between matchups, and that's 16 years and counting.

It is what it is - trying to manufacture such a thing as a UCONN football rivalry is foolish though. It's ok that we don't have it.

What we need to do, is simply go out and win. THen win more, and win some more after that. It's also been touched on that thanksgiving weekend in CT is a bad idea - I agree. Students aren't around, and for local high school football, whatever you think of it - thanksgiving is the most important time.

Filling our home stadium, and filling arenas on the road, any time, any weekend, is entirely about us- and winning. Embrace it. Love it.
 
...Because of the way things turned out for UCONN from 1997 through current, with the constantly changing conference membership every 2-3 years at most, come 2014...we simply do not have anything in football scheduling that can be even remotely be called a "rivalry", and what we have here with young student Drew, is a 21 year old kid that has recognized that is something that UCONN football doesn't have, and wants it.

Maybe Drew can steal the Minuteman...Alas, there is a real person in that costume. It's no longer a harmless prank. It's called kidnapping nowadays...

What we need to do, is simply go out and win. Then win more, and win some more after that. It's also been touched on that thanksgiving weekend in CT is a bad idea - I agree. Students aren't around, and for local high school football, whatever you think of it - thanksgiving is the most important time.

Filling our home stadium, and filling arenas on the road, any time, any weekend, is entirely about us- and winning. Embrace it. Love it.

Provided UConn does the former (win), the latter (fill the stadium) will not be an issue regardless of timing...even on the Saturday after Thanksgiving. It's been mentioned by myself and others that student attendance was lacking that game this year due to 1) product on the field (2 1-9 teams), 2) Weather (19 degrees w/wind), 3) Timing. Fix 1), hope for better 2), and 3) becomes a non-issue.
 
And I complained about the new Husky...
You'd be surprised how many folks were upset at dropping Engineers in favor of Mountain Hawks. I was there from 96-98 before smartening up and finishing at UConn.
 
You'd be surprised how many folks were upset at dropping Engineers in favor of Mountain Hawks. I was there from 96-98 before smartening up and finishing at UConn.

Very true. Not to mention the fact that there is no such thing as a Mountain Hawk...

And yes, UCONN would have been much better on my wallet. Sallie Mae would beg to differ.
 
.-.
While I would love to see an annual game with a P5 opponent late in the year it's unlikely to happen.

The Big 10 has already gone to a 9 game league schedule and the Big 12 has a 9 team round robin format. Given the upcoming SEC Network and the dollars that ESPN is paying the ACC I would guess that for inventory purposes they will be going to a 9 game schedule as well.

The reality is that there will probably not be any P5 teams available to play on an annual basis after September/beginning of October
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,384
Messages
4,569,661
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom