White Husky or Blue Husky? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

White Husky or Blue Husky?

Which Husky represents UConn more?


  • Total voters
    91
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've decided!!!!!

I like the Blue better (while still standing behind my comment on the white logo on a metallic blue helmet). No offense intended toward Penfield and his expert Photoshop abilities, but I think the all white logo too closely resembles a polar bear.

There needs to be some contrast akin to my new avatar.
 
I've decided!!!!!

I like the Blue better (while still standing behind my comment on the white logo on a metallic blue helmet). No offense intended toward Penfield and his expert Photoshop abilities, but I think the all white logo too closely resembles a polar bear.

There needs to be some contrast akin to my new avatar.

This is a striking resemblance to your avi. Wolf my as*


8823413-1.jpeg
 
This is a striking resemblance to your avi. Wolf my as*


View attachment 2766
I searched for "Siberian Husky" on Yahoo. My avatar is one of the images that came up. An image of a white dog didn't pop up until page 3.
 
They may potentially go with an all white face, but I don't see a reversion back to the old "lick your face off" logo.

PITT's logo was a Scripted font "Pitt" written in a lighter blue and yellow before they went to "PITTSBURGH"and the panther in a darker blue and gold. The Administration didn't like the negative connotation of the word and they tried to be known as Pittsburgh. At least if they shared the same name as the city in which they are located it wouldn't sound as bad. Afterall, no one says "Pitt Steelers," "Pitt Pirates," or "Pitt Penguins"...As it turnd out, no one unofficially (i.e. students and fans) referred to them as such. Now they have reverted back to PITT, but in the same classy dark blue and gold. There was no reversion to the old logo.

At least UConn is referred to as UConn on a regular basis.
I agree that it is unlikely that they go back to the "original" logo. I think its more likely that they go in the direction of Pitt and pretty much eliminate the use of the husky logo entirely, or if not entirely, at least mostly. How often do you see the Pitt Panther on anything? Or the UCLA Bruin or the Oregon Duck? they exist and show up on occasion but it isn't a major element. I think that will be the final outcome here, too. UCONN will be the primary identifier. And the word Huskies. But the logo, not so much. Over time it will be dropped entirely or replaced by something more like the white "penfield husky" and nobody will really say anything publicly.
 
In fact, we know that they asked Ollie, PP, Geno and several players. Presumably they are "fans" and part of the "UConn Community". I initially thought the white one from Pen might be better, but looking at them side by side, it is just too plain. It also looks even more wolf-like and agressive. The blue accents without the mask cause that effect.


I'm cool with the blue one, and agree that the white one looks too plain, but it was just a quick edit by Penfield to see how it would look. If the accents & highlights were redone in the right places, the white one could work.
 
.-.
I searched for "Siberian Husky" on Yahoo. My avatar is one of the images that came up. An image of a white dog didn't pop up until page 3.
I searched on google and it was on page 1, so who knows what arrangements these search engines have...
 
I see 3 possible outcomes from all this. 1. After a relatively brief period, UConn quietly modifies the new coke toupee dog and replaces it with something more traditional. They can't do it right away because no doubt Nike already has next season's designs in the works and the new t-shirts and such are already being printed. So they have to use it for a year.
2. UConn recognizes the error of their ways and announces that the old logo is being brought back. I think that is unlikely but possible. By the way, Muncey's comments that they needed a new logo to unify the look among teams...nonsense. Nike wanted that.
3. UConn pretty much becomes the dominant "logo" sort of like what Pitt has done. Oh you see a panther here and there, but its a relatively minor element in their identity. Replace the Husky logo at mid-court and Center Ice and mid-field with UCONN. I suspect that might be where we're heading, in which case the Husky can be pretty much anything. Maybe a small one shows up on a football uniform or "woven" into the basketball jersey, but it isn't a major element. The hats say UCONN. the facilities all say UCONN, the Uniforms all say UCONN. Over the past 2 decades the Husky logo has been the main identifier. That might be the real change in all this.

My guess is none of the above. There is no error. This is the logo and it is a major upgrade. Yes UCONN will also be more prominent.
 
Sure, this might spare me as it would be smaller...

Still, the husky has blue shading on the top of its head. We're all going to have to make our peace with that.
Wishful thinking - they're sizes are 11.5 and 10.
 
If the blue version stays, they then need to phase out the all white Jonathons to match. Or change the blue to white. It has to be all white huskies or regular huskies. Uconn is the only school that has an all white husky, that made us unique, there are many regular husky logos out there. I think the blue version waters down our identity.
 
I just improved the logo in 5 minutes on paint erasing all the blue but the outline so the face has shape to it. It actually looks like a white dog.
 
.-.
Maybe...if enough fans are concerned about keeping with the unique traditional white look that no other husky teams have.

I'm actually in favor of the blue/white one, but I may just vote for white to see you eat a shoe.
 
Which Husky represents UConn more? Penfield's white one or the blue toupee?

Cobalt And Ivory Live Together In Perfect Harmony
Side By Side On My Husky Logo, Oh Lord, Why Don't We?
 
Actually, apparently, it's the lack of any pigment at the crown of a dog's head. Without that, we're nothing.

GET RID OF THAT AVATAR!!! I went to the University of Connecticut. Not the University of Oak Leaf!!! Do you know how badly you are misrepresenting the Unversity without the state crest in that seal? For shame, '08!

Edit: The original quote in 1999 referred to the University of Oak, not Oak leaf. Husky25 regrets the mistake.
 
I'm not a huge fan of the all-white one. I can't quite pin it...maybe something to do with the lack of contrast? The blue one looks a lot better, IMO.

You did a great job on it, Pen, but I just prefer the blue one.
 
.-.
Whichever logo brings more NC's to UConn and gets UConn into a conference with a better payout to it's members.
 
I agree that it is unlikely that they go back to the "original" logo. I think its more likely that they go in the direction of Pitt and pretty much eliminate the use of the husky logo entirely, or if not entirely, at least mostly. How often do you see the Pitt Panther on anything? Or the UCLA Bruin or the Oregon Duck? they exist and show up on occasion but it isn't a major element. I think that will be the final outcome here, too. UCONN will be the primary identifier. And the word Huskies. But the logo, not so much. Over time it will be dropped entirely or replaced by something more like the white "penfield husky" and nobody will really say anything publicly.
Are we sure it wasn't because the new panther logo wasn't too expensive to reproduce? It is quite detailed. The Patriots rebranded to the flying Elvis partially because Pat Patriot was very detailed and expensive.
 
GET RID OF THAT AVATAR!!! I went to the University of Connecticut. Not the University of Oak Leaf!!! Do you know how badly you are misrepresenting the Unversity without the state crest in that seal? For shame, '08!

Edit: The original quote in 1999 referred to the University of Oak, not Oak leaf. Husky25 regrets the mistake.
Charter Oak. :p

This new logo sucks.
 
One thing seems certain to me: after having read many of the comments on the Boneyard and on UConn's Facebook page, the major problem is not that we are changing logos, but that the change is inconsistent with 70 years of brand history. White dog, unlike any of the other huskies around the country. If they go to a Penfield-like white logo, a large portion of UConn Nation will be satisfied. C'mon, President Herbst...c'mon, Nike...."Just do it!"
 
One thing seems certain to me: after having read many of the comments on the Boneyard and on UConn's Facebook page, the major problem is not that we are changing logos, but that the change is inconsistent with 70 years of brand history. White dog, unlike any of the other huskies around the country. If they go to a Penfield-like white logo, a large portion of UConn Nation will be satisfied. C'mon, President Herbst...c'mon, Nike...."Just do it!"

You're giving WAY too much credit to this fan base. Guaranteed, if the Penfield remix came out first, the uproar would be just as loud. It's just that a decent size of Boneyarders like yourself have found a middle ground, and I'm not entirely opposed to the white remix. The logo and shape itself of the mark is good, that's why the white one can work too. That gives credit to the actual design, which so few people want to do.

I ventured over to the facebook page to check out the entertainment and have a few laughs. I left that experience feeling embarrassed by our representation. People complaining about the cost when it was a free design, people complaining about the fact that the athletic department is changing the athletic logo and WHAT ABOUT THE ACADEMICS? Morons.

Others complaining that it looks like Northeastern (not even close), Washington (a very old version, and even then, not really). Guess what? Huskies look like huskies. Even if they're all white. "But it looks like a wolf". Guess what dipsh1ts, huskies look like wolves. Even the white ones. Others saying no one recognizes us by this husky. No , it's a new brand.

And there was an overwhelming amount of people (who all happen to be about 60 and female, and thus why Facebook is terrible) complaining about losing the smiling, licking samoyed.

The Boneyard has been markedly better in its response, with a few noisy stragglers. And for the record, this dog is still very white and in a way that is unique. The blue fur adds to the mark in a way that is going to look fantastic on our jerseys and helmets. And likely the reason why there's blue fur at the top. Wait til you see it on the jerseys and see the contrast and the husky really pop, likely in a way that the all white would not. This is what brand designers and managers are for.

Bottom line that people need to understand, the ONLY reason we have such an attachment to that damn samoyed is because we won with it. And won with it a lot. People associated us with it because we were always on tv, always winning. We will do the same thing with new Jonathan, and people will know us.

No, we didn't distinguish ourselves from Washington and Northeastern and Northern Illinois because our dog was all white. We distinguished ourselves because we're better than those schools. At everything. Winning made the mark and made us a national player. We'll do it again
 
.-.
One thing seems certain to me: after having read many of the comments on the Boneyard and on UConn's Facebook page, the major problem is not that we are changing logos, but that the change is inconsistent with 70 years of brand history. White dog, unlike any of the other huskies around the country. If they go to a Penfield-like white logo, a large portion of UConn Nation will be satisfied. C'mon, President Herbst...c'mon, Nike...."Just do it!"

On the contrary, from what I've seen on Facebook, their major beef IS the fact that we're changing logos - period. The big issue about the all-white Husky seems to be here on the 'Yard.

Somebody posting there has a FB page going titled "Bring back the old UConn logo." Their tagline is (no joke): NOBODY WITH A SOUL LIKES THE NEW UCONN LOGO!

Ya gotta love hyperbole.
 
I respectfully disagree with you both (shocking, I know).

jrazz, we HAVE CERTAINLY distinguished ourselves by having an all-white husky from the other universities. It was so important to us that we insured that we kept an all-white Jonathan every year. It was not by accident that from Jonathan II all the way to Jonathan XIII, the dog was an all-white husky. So the idea that our only attachment to the previous logo was the victories earned underneath it is preposterous. There was not nearly the same uproar from the 1996 upgrade as there has been for this one (I was on campus during the change), and the major reasons are color and consistent brand image.

Bugsy, I have seen literally hundreds of "all-white" comments on Facebook. There have been at least three UConn FB posts since the release, the latest one being a Q&A (solely dealing with the overwhelmingly negative response). As for the person commenting about people with souls, I don't put stock in one idiot's posts. It's the hundreds of others that I would put stock in...
 
I respectfully disagree with you both (shocking, I know).

jrazz, we HAVE CERTAINLY distinguished ourselves by having an all-white husky from the other universities. It was so important to us that we insured that we kept an all-white Jonathan every year. It was not by accident that from Jonathan II all the way to Jonathan XIII, the dog was an all-white husky. So the idea that our only attachment to the previous logo was the victories earned underneath it is preposterous. There was not nearly the same uproar from the 1996 upgrade as there has been for this one (I was on campus during the change), and the major reasons are color and consistent brand image.

Bugsy, I have seen literally hundreds of "all-white" comments on Facebook. There have been at least three UConn FB posts since the release, the latest one being a Q&A (solely dealing with the overwhelmingly negative response). As for the person commenting about people with souls, I don't put stock in one idiot's posts. It's the hundreds of others that I would put stock in...

Yeah but I think this all white thing is internal. I don't believe for a second people outside of UConn primarily recognize us as having a white husky and that's how they distinguish us from the other huskies teams. They recognize the samoyed only because that image has been used as we've been dominating nationally. If we made this run with the new image, people would recognize us with that.

The white only dog is entirely internal to UConn, and I can appreciate the sentimentality. I just don't care. It's a logo. And it's only been around since 2002. And the athletes and coaches that actually represent us and wear it, chose it and like it. As long as they win with it, I'm good.
 
I respectfully disagree with you both (shocking, I know).

jrazz, we HAVE CERTAINLY distinguished ourselves by having an all-white husky from the other universities. ..

Except our logo was a samoyed not a Husky. We distinguished ourselves by having an entirely different breed of dog as our logo. Whats worse, having the wrong breed as your logo or changing the color?
 
You must be looking at different threads there than me, Dan. Most of the complaints I'm seeing are that it looks like a wolf. Not nearly as much about an all-white Husky as you're saying. (But I didn't scroll through all of them so I could be wrong - pretty much got the gist right away that 99.999% of them hate the new logo.)
 
I'm not a huge fan of the all-white one. I can't quite pin it...maybe something to do with the lack of contrast? The blue one looks a lot better, IMO.

You did a great job on it, Pen, but I just prefer the blue one.

Maybe it's the bald headline? I mean, I did suggest the toupee come off, but... now the husky is bald.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,370
Messages
4,568,716
Members
10,472
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom