We were also effectively missing our sole backup guard (Molly Davis) who was limited to just 1 minute after suffering an ankle injury in the first quarter.
As an Iowa fan I would be
thrilled to get absolutely thrashed by South Carolina... because that would mean we made the Final Four to begin with!
In all seriousness though there's no way realistic Iowa could hang with SC. Maybe we'd win 1 game out of 10 thanks to a very very hot shooting night from 3. South Carolina is just a whole different machine than anyone else in the NCAA right now, and the acclaim they're getting is fully deserved.
This is going to sound weird, but I think Iowa is both better than almost anyone else in the SEC and would finish 4th or 5th in the conference.
What I mean is, if every team in the sport played every other team 100 times, I think Iowa would have a better record than almost any SEC team other than South Carolina. They’d have one of the best records in the nation. But I also think Iowa would finish outside the top two of the conference because the sort of teams that are challenging matchups for Iowa are found throughout the SEC. They’d bomb someone out of the building one night, but the next night might run into a game like Georgia, but on the road or with a mid-January home crowd.
Matchups matter. As an example in the other direction, I didn’t want any part of UCLA as our 4, even though I believe Iowa is an objectively better team than the Bruins.
A lot of Carolina fans want to play Iowa not because of any animosity for the team or their fans, but because we honestly believe Aliyah Boston has been the best player in the nation for four years, yet she had to take a backseat to Ionesco, then Bueckers, and now Clarke. They’re all incredible players, but a lot of our fans believe or suspect there are other subconscious motivations for some journalistic preferences there. We can’t play the first two, but we can play Clarke.
I’m sorry if it seems like I’m harsh on Iowa, but I hope this helps explain the thinking a little bit.