Where is UConn at QB? (Silver)

[ConnHuskBask]

Stick to the basketball board.

OK, just making sure at Cinci, at UCF and Ville for a true freshman should be graded on the same scale as at Temple, vs Rutgers/Ville?

then again when you have Art openly asking why should a bad defense make
it easier for a QB, than a good defense you may be beyond repair.

 

[sportsart]

OK, just making sure at Cinci, at UCF and Ville for a true freshman should be graded on the same scale as at Temple, vs Rutgers/Ville?

then again when you have Art openly asking why should a bad defense make
it easier for a QB, than a good defense you may be beyond repair.

Boyle has not shown he can't read defenses quickly while Casey did. That's the difference between a good QB and a not so good QB. That's not to say Boyle won't surpass Casey, but pound for pound, Casey has exhibited better skills, so far.

Casey made 3 throws Saturday that weren't just lucky. The ball to Bradley where the ball was on the way before Bradley made his cut. The touchdown pass just over the defender's hand to (the name escapes me) and the best of all...the 30 yd pass to Lamelle that was in coverage tighter than a glove. Those are exceptional passes that good QB's make. All skill and no luck.

When better defenses come into play, I certainly don't expect to see Casey have monster games. But a QB who is smart, accurate and quick to throw stand a much better chance at success.

It was unfair to expect Boyle to come in and be a good QB. Casey had the advantage over him and then some. But just because someone does very well vs lousy teams doesn't mean they are not good. Until proven otherwise Casey is a good QB, who I expect to get even better.



But so will Boyle.

 

[ibleedhuskyblue]

To everyone talking schedule...

Whitmer lost to Towson
Boyle lost to USF

Casey beat the beatable teams that we should beat. He was the only one who did.

 

[amory]

OK, just making sure at Cinci, at UCF and Ville for a true freshman should be graded on the same scale as at Temple, vs Rutgers/Ville?

then again when you have Art openly asking why should a bad defense make
it easier for a QB, than a good defense you may be beyond repair.

So your point is that Boyle's terrible performances against good opponents are equal to Cochran's very good performances against bad opponents?

I'm just trying to understand what you saw in Boyle this year that in any way makes him a better option than Cochran going forward. Could Cochran lose the job by performing badly next year? Sure. But it should be his job to lose.

 

[UConnJim]

I posted this information in another post:

UConn's QBs were sacked 42 times this year.

Casey Cochran was sacked 4 times (175 attempts), Whitmer was sacked 20 times (129 attempts), Boyle was sacked 18 times (133 attempts).

And, people forget that Cochran played in 8 games this year: Buffalo 5 pass attempts, Cinci 3 pass attempts, UCF 11 pass attempts, Louisville 9 pass attempts, SMU 42 pass attempts, Temple 18 pass attempts, Rutgers 33 pass attempts, and Memphis 54 pass attempts.

Finally, Cochran's Passing Efficiency rating for this year was 141.7, which would have placed him at #41 for NCAA QBs. Not bad for a RS freshman!

 

[sportsart]

I posted this information in another post:

UConn's QBs were sacked 42 times this year.

Casey Cochran was sacked 4 times (175 attempts), Whitmer was sacked 20 times (129 attempts), Boyle was sacked 18 times (133 attempts).

And, people forget that Cochran played in 8 games this year: Buffalo 5 pass attempts, Cinci 3 pass attempts, UCF 11 pass attempts, Louisville 9 pass attempts, SMU 42 pass attempts, Temple 18 pass attempts, Rutgers 33 pass attempts, and Memphis 54 pass attempts.

Finally, Cochran's Passing Efficiency rating for this year was 141.7, which would have placed him at #41 for NCAA QBs. Not bad for a RS freshman!

Let's be fair though. Casey had the advantage of an OL that found itself after being off course for quite a while. The game plan for the last 2.5 games was set up to take advantage of poor secondaries by passing almost non stop.

I think any of our QB's would have beaten Memphis. RU and Temple...not sure.

 

[UConnJim]

Let's be fair though. Casey had the advantage of an OL that found itself after being off course for quite a while. The game plan for the last 2.5 games was set up to take advantage of poor secondaries by passing almost non stop.

I think any of our QB's would have beaten Memphis. RU and Temple...not sure.

I'm not so sure the other QBs would have beaten those teams. In my view, the biggest difference between Cochran and the other QBs was how they reacted to pressure. Cochran seemed to step up in the pocked and the others seemed to step back. In addition, it seemed Cochran got rid of the ball faster, but I don't have any numbers to base that on. The result was fewer sacks of Cochran than the other QBs.

The interception numbers, completion %, TD passes, and QB rating among the three QBs speak for themselves.

 

[sdhusky]

Yeah I don't disagree. But there's a reason why you throw for 461 against Memphis and not against Mich St.

Dan O put up his numbers against teams like this.

I just looked at his senior season - against WVU, Georgia Tech & BC, he didn't look too impressive.

Even against Murray St, he didn't put up CC numbers.

 

[Stinger92860]

I almost agree with mets on this. No way is Cochran not the leader and by a wide margin. Any coach who has a lick of sense will see that. My view is that we may have seen Tim Boyle's career at UConn. Cochran has certainly established himself as the man to beat and if he locks down the job next year, as I suspect he will, he will not be replaced by anyone after that. After he is done, it leaves only a year for Boyle, best case, and by then the new coach will have "his" quarterback ready to step in. The coaches did Boyle no favors by starting him this year. He was clearly not ready, and now he is a failed starter rather than a hot prospect. The situation reminds me a little of Texas when Major Applewhite was there along with Chris Simms. One had the pedigree and the tools. The other only won games.

Boyle would have 2 years left after casey graduates if Boyle red shirts next year.

 

[Stinger92860]

Let's be fair though. Casey had the advantage of an OL that found itself after being off course for quite a while. The game plan for the last 2.5 games was set up to take advantage of poor secondaries by passing almost non stop.

I think any of our QB's would have beaten Memphis. RU and Temple...not sure.

Casey made the oline better with his reads and quicker progressions. He did not have happy feet either. For the record, I'd be running for my life.

 

[Yonick]

Bottom line is if one of our other QB's can beat out Casey next season, then he'll have improved greatly. No matter who the coach is, next season, he's going to choose the best QB. Right now, it's Casey by a mile.

 

[amory]

Boyle would have 2 years left after casey graduates if Boyle red shirts next year.

?

1 year, no? Casey was a red shirt freshman this year

 

[SubbaBub]

I am going to hope all three get better in the off season and double hope that all three make this year's version of themselves a poor memory. I expect an open competition. CC can hold the mantle if that makes some of you happy.

 

[ConnHuskBask]

So your point is that Boyle's terrible performances against good opponents are equal to Cochran's very good performances against bad opponents?

I'm just trying to understand what you saw in Boyle this year that in any way makes him a better option than Cochran going forward. Could Cochran lose the job by performing badly next year? Sure. But it should be his job to lose.

If you read earlier post, I said CC goes into the off season as the starter.

To make him captain and proclaim him the starter by a wide margin I don't think is doing due diligence.

Boyle played awful this season but he has great measurables.
CC played very good, but had very easy opponents.

Not everything on the Boneyard is so white and black. We can to into camp with a QB competition and it likely makes both better.

 

[IMind]

I've got no skin in the game. If one of the QBs other than Casey comes in in the spring/summer and blows him out of the water... than fine... I don't expect it.... but Casey didn't just throw for a few hundred yards against crap competition... he set all time records at UConn. I don't care who it's against. That's impressive. Anyone who argues that it was because Memphis was crap competition is being disingenuous and has an agenda. Every QB that started for UConn this year played against crap competition. Only one was successful.... or do you want to argue somehow that USF or Buffalo are top 25 teams? It was the best passing day in the HISTORY of UConn football. That should open up some breathing room between him and someone else.

 

[IMind]

Dan O put up his numbers against teams like this.

I just looked at his senior season - against WVU, Georgia Tech & BC, he didn't look too impressive.

Even against Murray St, he didn't put up CC numbers.

No disrespect to O'Neil Wilson, but Dan O never threw to someone as good as Geremy Davis when he was at UConn.

 

[huskysupporter]

Boyle has not shown he can read defenses quickly while Casey did. That's the difference between a good QB and a not so good QB. That's not to say Boyle won't surpass Casey, but pound for pound, Casey has exhibited better skills, so far.

Casey made 3 throws Saturday that weren't just lucky. The ball to Bradley where the ball was on the way before Bradley made his cut. The touchdown pass just over the defender's hand to (the name escapes me) and the best of all...the 30 yd pass to Lamelle that was in coverage tighter than a glove. Those are exceptional passes that good QB's make. All skill and no luck.

When better defenses come into play, I certainly don't expect to see Casey have monster games. But a QB who is smart, accurate and quick to throw stand a much better chance at success.

It was unfair to expect Boyle to come in and be a good QB. Casey had the advantage over him and then some. But just because someone does very well vs lousy teams doesn't mean they are not good. Until proven otherwise Casey is a good QB, who I expect to get even better.



But so will Boyle.

I don't think Boyle's issues were as much about reading defenses. His main issue was his woeful inaccuracy.

He has the arm, but unless he can work on his accuracy, he will struggle.

 

[Hoophound]

I just skipped ahead so forgive me if this has been said but: Has a starting QB ever passed for 464 yards or so in his season finale and then lost his job in training camp? I will venture to guess it has never happened other than due to injury, legal problems or disciplinary problems.

Casey will be the starter. Benching him would be the riskiest thing a new coach could do. If we lost with Boyle or Whitmer starting on opening day, we'd run the new coach out of town.

 

[huskymedic]

I don't get why this thread blew up...? Silver ends his "Where are we article" with:

"Then, there’s Cochran. He doesn’t measure up physically to any of the four quarterbacks mentioned above. But, none of them can boast throwing for a school-record in yardage in his fourth game and no one has played as well as the 6-foot-1 redshirt freshman. Cochran always begins these battles behind because of his physical limitations. He starts ahead this spring because of his performance. In the end, that’s all that matters."

 

[ibleedhuskyblue]

Boyle played awful this season but he has great measurables.

Can we please stop with the damn measurables ???

This is how we got into this mess in the first place. Paul loved the measurables too. Now we have a bunch of big, slow guys who can't win football games.....all because of measurables.

I don't care what anyone looks like. I care what they PLAY FOOTBALL like.

Casey played better. He doesnt have the measurables. Neither do Drew Brees, or Johnny Manziel. Players play....we need players, not measurements.

 

[ucjoet]

Boyle would have 2 years left after casey graduates if Boyle red shirts next year.

No. He would only have 1 year

 

[Nostical]

The new Coach's offensive philosphy will determine who will start. If the new guy wants to run a spread like Ohio St or a zone read like Auburn, Boyle will transfer. That's just not his style. Offensive philosophy will be high on the interview question agenda and it's the system that will dictate as much as anything who will be under center vs BYU. We just may already have a very good option QB in Kivon Taylor who will take the reins next fall. Let's not annoint anyone just yet.

As for Casey Cochran, there is no doubt his quick reads and decision making have aided the O Line. It's funny how the O Line looks a lot better when the QB gets the ball out quicker. As Sportsart points out, he's also been the most accurate. I suggest we stop rationalizing Casey's success by calling Memphis a terrible team. Sure they had a bad record but UCF and Louisville each beat the Tigers by only 7 points. My sense is that if he had been given the reins and the reps earlier, he would have found success against the better teams as well. The final factor is his leadership. Its not just the quiet kind. He has instilled a large dose of needed confidence in the team. So I agree he's the frontrunner for now. But let's watch and see how it all develops among the QB candidates. It's a nice problem to have.

 

[ucjoet]

No disrespect to O'Neil Wilson, but Dan O never threw to someone as good as Geremy Davis when he was at UConn.

I just do not understand why so many posters do not want to give CC any credit. Since Dan O, we have been looking for a QB. I was always hoping for someone we could consider average, because it seemed liked our QB play was consistently below average. Now we get a kid ( CC ) that has shown more in 4 games then any other QB since Dan O, and we are trashing him. Will he be our star for the next 3 years, I really don't know. But only a dope would not see that by how he has played that we may be on to something.

In regards to strength of competition, there has been plenty of times ( to lazy to research) where we have gone through a similar stretch in the past. And there has not been a QB in the last 10 years ( since Dan O ), that even comes close to what he has done. Will he be a Heisman candidate , probably not. But he has a chance to be a real good QB here. Remember that would make me happy, because I have always only hopinged to have an average QB.

 

[DMW88]

If i'm the new coach, EVERYONE earns it in spring practice. That is the intent of bringing a new coach in. He needs to evaluate talent and determine his system. Obviously the cream should rise to the top, but a new coach needs to make it his team! Not based on who did what on a 3-9 team against some not so good opponents.

 

[Sean]

My only question is...

If TJ Weist and Casey Cochran are back next year, will the dorm spy give us full practice blow by blow details?

 

[bmayuc]

Love this thread

Passion!!! that's what we missed all year!

All I will say is, i CANT WAIT FOR SPRING GAME. New Head Coach, 3-5 competent QBs, a MONSTER at WR. A couple dynamic RBs added to the backfield(Arkeel, Marriner, Williams?).

Defense will hopefully sort itself out, but this will be fun!

can we just skip to April 1?

 

[IMind]

I just do not understand why so many posters do not want to give CC any credit.

So you completely didn't bother to read my post that came right this post where I gave CC a ton of credit?

Dan O never did throw to receiver as good as Davis at UConn. That doesn't diminish a single thing CC did. I fully expect him to be our starter next year.

 

[ucjoet]

So you completely didn't bother to read my post that came right this post where I gave CC a ton of credit?

Dan O never did throw to receiver as good as Davis at UConn. That doesn't diminish a single thing CC did. I fully expect him to be our starter next year.

I guess you didn't bother to read ( maybe you could not understand it ) my post. I stated I do not understand why so many ( NOT ALL) posters do not want to give CC any credit. This board have so many people that are so sensitive that it is ridiculous. I truly hope that the biggest problem you have is that you believe I did not bother to fully read your post.

 

[Jimmy Serrano]

I guess you didn't bother to read ( maybe you could not understand it ) my post. I stated I do not understand why so many ( NOT ALL) posters do not want to give CC any credit. This board have so many people that are so sensitive that it is ridiculous. I truly hope that the biggest problem you have is that you believe I did not bother to fully read your post.

I haven't seen one poster not give CC any credit.