This is exactly why
@EricLA is right. The notion that our ‘second 5’ is a top team in itself only makes sense if we mean that
potentially they might eventually become comparable with what other top teams
actually are right now. And even this is implausible on its face in almost every case, since it includes so many assumptions that run contrary to our experience. Still, as an expression of our enthusiasm for the non-starters, it is a wonderful bit of hyperbole. As it happens, I am a fan of enthusiasm and hyperbole. But I must also admit that this one can’t be taken nearly as seriously as some of our other habitual enthusiasms.