What's the right number for Division 1 basketball? | The Boneyard

What's the right number for Division 1 basketball?

What is the right number for Division 1 basketball

  • 79 (P4 + Big East)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    51

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,507
Reaction Score
20,954
I personally believe there are too many schools in Division 1 basketball. I like the big tent nature of Division 1 but feel it has become too bloated. To me, the perfect number is somewhere between 225 and 275.

What do you think?
 
University of New Haven is moving to D1. I wonder how that could affect the lives of anyone other than New Haven and the teams they play.
 
University of New Haven is moving to D1. I wonder how that could affect the lives of anyone other than New Haven and the teams they play.
Do they have a date for the Smokey Robinson concert yet?
 
Make it 256 and everyone gets into the tourney. There are your Cinderellas (it would be even more interesting if the bracket was done by random draw akin to the FA Cup).
 
Make it 256 and everyone gets into the tourney.
The way I look at it, the conference tourneys are de facto 1st rounds that include everyone. And each conference gets to keep the money they generate.
 
I personally believe there are too many schools in Division 1 basketball. I like the big tent nature of Division 1 but feel it has become too bloated. To me, the perfect number is somewhere between 225 and 275.

What do you think?
As long as we aren't giving more auto bids to new conferences of teams that have no right being D-1, or paying more money out to those who aren't trying to compete, why would anyone care?
 
As long as we aren't giving more auto bids to new conferences of teams that have no right being D-1, or paying more money out to those who aren't trying to compete, why would anyone care?
It is one of two major factors causing the tournament to expand (the other being P4 expansion) past its most popular 64-team format. If we were still around 300 like in the 90s, five or six auto bids would have evaporated due to realignment and expansion could not be argued for.
 
It is one of two major factors causing the tournament to expand (the other being P4 expansion) past its most popular 64-team format. If we were still around 300 like in the 90s, five or six auto bids would have evaporated due to realignment and expansion could not be argued for.
I understand, but it doesn't have to follow like the night the day. If the Northeast Conference wants to triple its pitiful membership, let it go for it. But there shouldn't be more bids or money to it because it does so.

And then no one needs to or would care.
 
I like the idea where 25% of the teams can make the NCAA the tournament on a given year.

with a 68-team tournament that places it a 272 member schools
 
I like the idea where 25% of the teams can make the NCAA the tournament on a given year.

with a 68-team tournament that places it a 272 member schools
I like a system where 14.8 percent of teams make the tournament. No more, no less.
 
Who wasn't rooting for St. Peter's as they beat #2 Kentucky and #3 Purdue on their way to the Regional Final in 2022? Or Farleigh Dickinson as the #16 seed beating #1 seed Purdue in 2023? Or Princeton going to the Sweet 16? Or Oakland beating Kentucky and Yale beating Auburn in 2024? March Madness is about inclusivity and on any given night, magic can happen.
 

Online statistics

Members online
226
Guests online
3,168
Total visitors
3,394

Forum statistics

Threads
163,953
Messages
4,376,561
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom