Very strange indeed. L'ville has a great coach and a great recruiter in Sam Williams. Whatever is going on may have just sealed Russell to Tennessee...
my thought as well. I hadn't been keeping scholarship score for the Cardinals latelyor they are making room for Russell at Louisville!
apparently Epps had been playing poorly, Walz could have backed off
I believe Walz backed off on them and that both Epps & Goodwin will end up at WKU. I think Jeff is looking in to pull in a big 2014 class. Mitchell and MyChal Johnson are very high on Louisville. A lot of talented 2015 guards in KY as well. Epps & Goodwin have been putting up some very poor numbers against sub par competition recently so maybe that's why Walz backed off. I would love to get Chong but I think she is yours. My guess is we get a commit from Russell and Montgomery for sure in the 2013 class. (Montgomery is a guard out of Oregon and Mercedes Russell's best friend, btw)
Oh, and thumbs up for the person who mentioned Megan. She was way under ranked coming out of HS. She is the definition of a 6'0 Courtney Vandersloot. Sees the floor extremely well, great foot speed, passer, handle, and always looks to pass before taking a shot. I think she will be a valuable contributor for the Lady Cards next season
Thanks for the info. What does it mean to "back off" recruits who've already given a verbal commitment. Did he withdraw their offers? I admire your confidence on getting Russell.
M0re precisely, in the context of recruiting, "back off" means a coach really stops recruiting a player BEFORE a scholarship offer is made to that player. But in the case of these players decommitting from Louisville, they had to have scholarship offers before they made verbal commitments.. So the "back off" term would not apply on their cases." back off " means the coach either directly, or indirectly let the recruit know they were no longer wanted
Not to be technical - but a verbal is worth the paper it is printed on. So is what you are terming the scholarship offer (which is definately non-binding, also).M0re precisely, in the context of recruiting, "back off" means a coach really stops recruiting a player BEFORE a scholarship offer is made to that player. But in the case of these players decommitting from Louisville, they had to have scholarship offers before they made verbal commitments.. So the "back off" term would not apply on their cases.
Our Louisville visitor is saying, or at least implying, that Walz did something to make them decommit, and that would mean he withdrew their scholarship offers, after they verbally committed, accepting those offers.. I have never heard of a coach doing that before, and if he did it, Walz did something that many would see as unethical.
Not to be technical - but a verbal is worth the paper it is printed on. So is what you are terming the scholarship offer (which is definately non-binding, also).
Louisville, Russell is also very good friends with Mavunga, committed to UNC.
... Russell is also very good friends with Mavunga ...
Cowabunga! Ya mean it's not Mavunga?But which one is Russell's BFF?
Our Louisville visitor is saying, or at least implying, that Walz did something to make them decommit, and that would mean he withdrew their scholarship offers, after they verbally committed, accepting those offers.. I have never heard of a coach doing that before, and if he did it, Walz did something that many would see as unethical.
Just to make an academic point: all of the commentary on this issue puts the onus on the coach, in this case, Walz. Is it possible that the potential player bears some responsibility? Did their grades/performance/effort/interest/focus/attitude slip? I don't know bupkus about this particular situation, I'll be the first to admit - but, having coached high school girls sports for eight years, sophmores and juniors in high school aren't exactly calm, consistent, reliable human beings. If the verbal was accepted with the understanding that progress would continue, or certain benchmarks would be met...