nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 45,163
- Reaction Score
- 36,091
What will be the buy in period? Did SMU set the standard? Can UConn survive on no conference revenue and a much higher expense rate for 9 years?
NoWhat will be the buy in period? Did SMU set the standard? Can UConn survive on no conference revenue and a much higher expense rate for 9 years?
I thought you were all about the Big East? lolWhat will be the buy in period? Did SMU set the standard? Can UConn survive on no conference revenue and a much higher expense rate for 9 years?
UConn and the State of CT will need to decide whether they want to play major college athletics or stay in the BE with the small private type schools and not compete on a National Level.It will likely be a disappointing offer. Even so, it will be hard to turn it down.
I think that decision was made several years ago.UConn and the State of CT will need to decide whether they want to play major college athletics or stay in the BE with the small private type schools and not compete on a National Level.
Disagree…It will likely be a disappointing offer. Even so, it will be hard to turn it down.
I thought ESPN could drop out in 2 years if they wanted. Isn’t that what came out of this litigation?The best case scenario for the ACC is that it wins its lawsuits and the GOR is ironclad until 2036. It’s still screwed. Cal, Stanford, and SMU eventually receive full shares. None of the big brands will ever sign another GOR with the ACC again. The ACC will look vastly different when the GOR ends.
We knew Texas and Oklahoma were joining the SEC 3 years before it happened, and it could have been 4 years had the two not bought out the last year. Let’s assume the ACC doesn’t let anyone buy out any time. It’s still screwed in 2036 and we could know who is going where in the early 2030s and those schools just play out there time in the ACC.
Either the SEC and B1G take what they want and the best of the rest go to the Big 12 or the big brands in the ACC start their own new league without the bottom feeders. I don’t see any other ending for the ACC.
UConn and the State of CT will need to decide whether they want to play major college athletics or stay in the BE with the small private type schools and not compete on a National Level.
Disagree…
It’s all about supply and demand. If we have both ACC and Big 12 showing interest we have some leverage. I don’t know that we’ll be dictating terms, but we probably would have a better offer than the previously mentioned 7 year fb delay.
UConn’s value is at the highest it’s been. Hopefully it’s high enough to force one of the P3/P4 conferences to act.
I thought you were all about the Big East? lol
Yes. I think SMU is unique in that it was trying to buy its way into original Pac. They have huge amounts of cash and an extremely wealthy alumni base.So you think we will get a better offer than SMU got from the ACC?
Disagree…
It’s all about supply and demand. If we have both ACC and Big 12 showing interest we have some leverage.
Yes, that’s true. I was pointing out the best case scenario for the ACC, not the worst case scenario.I thought ESPN could drop out in 2 years if they wanted. Isn’t that what came out of this litigation?
To the Board of Directors at the University of Connecticut:
We cordially invite you to kiss our backsides as we have decided to not have you join our pathetic club. It is clear to our trustees that your school poses a threat, having too much upside and must therefore be removed from taking coveted playoff spots from our also-ran programs. We simply cannot risk having your school earn more money and gain further prestige while we whither away. We appreciate you rubbing in our faces how bad of a year our football and basketball programs had, and we hope you will take pity on us when our teams meet yours.
Without Wax,
The Scaredy Cats in charge of the ACC and Big12