Geno, also, may want Heather with all of the positive thoughts of her last two games and may not have wanted to risk that development at this point. Keep her moving forward.
She's a freshman for heaven's sake. Posts take a longer time to develop, have we not heard this time and again? Given what I saw last night from Kiah, I have high, high hopes for her.
A big part of the offensive rebounding advantage was the job Kelly did on Chiney. Holding her to 3 offensive rebounds, despite Chiney's height advantage, was a big part of this win, and a major accomplishment for Kelly. By comparison, Chiney had 10 offensive rebounds against Texas, without her sister helping out in the post.Good stats:
Out rebounded them 46-45, out offensively rebounded them (big big stat) 18-12.
Steals 12-3
Blocks 9-2
Turnovers 7-16
Bad stats:
Shooting (all kinds), 37% - 40%, 3pt 22% - 33%, FT 52% - 72%.
Free throws 11-21
Not our normal way of winning, but I'll take it.
She's a freshman for heaven's sake. Posts take a longer time to develop, have we not heard this time and again? Given what I saw last night from Kiah, I have high, high hopes for her.
Mild sarcasm from our friend RadyLady.Was I being critical of Kiah somehow...?
A big part of the offensive rebounding advantage was the job Kelly did on Chiney. Holding her to 3 offensive rebounds, despite Chiney's height advantage, was a big part of this win, and a major accomplishment for Kelly. By comparison, Chiney had 10 offensive rebounds against Texas, without her sister helping out in the post.
Exactly.I didn't put it in the interview thread but CD said something to the effect that the team came out like they wanted to win the game in the first five minutes.
Dolson's problem scoring last night was not hers but the entry pass in time and in rhythm. I am not sure how much better she would or would not have been executing more opportunities in the post against those previous posts who were shorter and less athletic than the three or four players she played against for Stanford.
Her strength and conditioning really showed last night.
Geno, also, may want Heather with all of the positive thoughts of her last two games and may not have wanted to risk that development at this point. Keep her moving forward.
Is it just me or did this game resemble the last two UConn efforts vs. Stanford? Is it something about the Cardinal red shirts or something in the Gatorade that turns the UConn women (or at least those not named Kaleena and Bria) to jelly when Stanford walks onto the court? When the game started I dreamed of a nice smooth run, getting some points on the board. The next thing I knew it was looking a lot like the first half of the 2010 national championship game. And where was Tiffany who, as a senior, is supposed to lead the team? When she finally scored some in the second half, even the commentators Mowins and Lobo noted her obvious relief.
Some thoughts: Also, Beth Mowins and Rebecca Lobo mentioned Stanford's horrible recent record east of the Mississippi. Is it fair to judge a team based on playing a top team after traveling 3,000 miles? Is it possible that the wear and tear of travel and the time change takes something out of the players? Although these young women are tremendous athletes, they're still human. I don't follow men's basketball. Do similar things happen in the men's game?
Some thoughts: Also, Beth Mowins and Rebecca Lobo mentioned Stanford's horrible recent record east of the Mississippi. Is it fair to judge a team based on playing a top team after traveling 3,000 miles? Is it possible that the wear and tear of travel and the time change takes something out of the players?
I think this is a statistic without meaning. A lot of Stanford's poor record has to do with the quality of the competition their facing. When they come east, it's always to play good teams - UConn, Tennessee, etc. And in tough environments.
If they were losing to mediocre teams, I'd say there was something to do it, but I dont believe that's the case.
KML's first bucket, on a drive to the basket, had the wags in Section 214 commenting on her body control. Unlike Mad Dash Hayes (I say that affectionately), Kaleena drove to the basket, saw the defenders converging and stopped on a dime without crashing into them or onto the floor. I also remarked at half time how impressed I was with her ability to set herself before a shot. It's really remarkable in such a young player.We learned last night that there doesn't appear to be a moment too big for KML. Think about it: she's not only a freshman playing in her first game against a top 10 team on national tv, but she's playing in front of a huge crowd including the 3-time Wade trophy winner whose number she now wears. Yet, she didn't try to do too much. She knew the team needed scoring and she made shots. She knew defense and rebounding were critically important and she did that too.
I think this is a statistic without meaning. A lot of Stanford's poor record has to do with the quality of the competition their facing. When they come east, it's always to play good teams - UConn, Tennessee, etc. And in tough environments.
If they were losing to mediocre teams, I'd say there was something to it, but I dont believe that's the case.
Correct. Stanford now plays every other year in Knoxville and hasn't won there since 1996.
We've had a home/home with TN for about 22 yrs (going by memory vs. looking it up).
Also without looking it up, I think our losses there average about 5-7 pts. Hard to win in Kville.
KML's first bucket, on a drive to the basket, had the wags in Section 214 commenting on her body control. Unlike Mad Dash Hayes (I say that affectionately), Kaleena drove to the basket, saw the defenders converging and stopped on a dime without crashing into them or onto the floor. I also remarked at half time how impressed I was with her ability to set herself before a shot. It's really remarkable in such a young player.