That is because Kara is a MUCH better analyst and announcer. Unfortunately, Rebecca is using Doris Burke, who has deteriorated badly over the years, as a model. Kara just calls the game and doesn't spend time on the personal crap.
Lawson has become much better in the studio. She used to just say things like, "When you talk about [name of school], it all starts with [name of player]. [Name of player] can do it all - offense, defense, inside, outside." There really wasn't much substance. She has become much better, though, and gives more of an analysis of strengths and weaknesses of particular players and teams.
Lobo was always good at doing the one thing very few female color commentators do - dissecting the Xs and Os of particular plays. Men's analysts do this all the time, but for whateve reason, very few (if any) of their female counterparts did. Lobo was one of the few who would diagram the play, explain how it was to be run, what the offensive players were trying to do, what the defensive players needed to do to stop the play from developing, etc.
To me, this is an ESSENTIAL part of color commentary. Yes, there needs to be a way to draw casual fans to women's basketball, as the stories can help sell the product. But if the analysis and commentary is all anecdotal tales, what is the point? At the end of the day, basketball is the product to be sold, not the individual player stories. The stories may help the product, but the analysis should be on the product itself.