Thank you. I've been posting here (and previous incarnations) for about 17-20 years?? IDK, a long time.
Guess I better let that one go.
I don't believe I have given you any.
That's ok, you'll still get them. You don't have to read them. In fact you can put me on ignore if you choose to. Kind of a cowards way out in my opinion, but whatever floats your boat.
Ok, I'm thinking you have me confused with someone else. I don't believe I've corrected any grammatical errors. It's not something I do. (unless it's like a funny Freudian slip) I agree or disagree with content.
With that I will definitely agree.
Sorry, I'm still gonna read your posts and comment as I see fit. If you don't like it, ignore me. Or make better posts.
Well read my post again. I said you can call them young. But it won't mean anything, because they won't play like a young team. That was my point. You're calling them young is pretty irrelevant.
And if you really want to look at it realistically, Tuck will be in her 4th year and Butler will be in her 3rd year. 5 to 6 isn't really a big deal. They will start at least 3 4th year players. And quite possibly 4 Upperclassmen. Young team infers that they lack experienced players. Next year's team by any stretch of the imagination will not be an inexperienced team.
Nobody, but I guess you, is gonna consider UCONN a young team.