What I Really Like About Hurley | Page 2 | The Boneyard

What I Really Like About Hurley

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,283
Reaction Score
30,877
Maybe I wasn't clear enough, although I think I kind of explained it further down the paragraph. No I don't think setting a solid screen makes your basketball IQ go up. What I do think is that if you don't set good screens consistently, come off screens well consistently, and move with purpose without the ball consistently, you have no chance of having a good offense. Those basic fundamentals are a must if you're going to have a remotely efficient offense. The past couple of years are a perfect example of what happens when your basic fundamentals are poor. I'm sure you don't need to see the dismal stats.

What I do think is that when you consistently do those things well it opens up a lot of opportunities, which in turn certainly make you look like a smarter player and a smarter team in general. Instead of lazily swinging the ball around the perimeter while standing around and forcing a shot with 3 seconds on the shot clock, it opens up opportunities for an extra pass to a wide open man, or a nice backdoor cut because of solid ball movement, spacing, running hard, moving well, and with purpose without the ball, etc. Solid basic fundamentals are the foundation for an efficient offense. An offense that does the basics well is going to look like a much smarter offense (individually and as a team) than what we've seen the past few seasons. There is no doubt in my mind.



I stated that I believe the biggest impact "right away with this group" is going to be setting a higher standard in practice. Obviously you need to recruit the right pieces. Although even the right pieces, generally speaking, arent going to work magic without solid, basic fundamentals being in place and setting high standards in general.


I said "I strongly believe that KO could not have set a high enough standard at practice" and I'll stand by that opinion 100%. I'm not sure what you saw on the floor the past couple of seasons that would remotely lead you to believe they were being coached well and were held to a high standard (even with the most basic things) at practice. The team was piss poor at the most basic, simple fundamentals of the game, and their effort, quite often, was sorely lacking. In my opinion that is 100% on the coach and the standard and expectations he sets at practice.

Your observations are rational and accurate. A handful of the people on this site are never going to see what was plainly in front of them. The reason being they don't want to see what was plainly in front of them.

To say that UConn was bad the past 2 seasons based on deficient recruiting is incredibly simplistic and short sighted. Take the Columbia game as an example. They were 8-19 this season, yet still pushed the game to overtime against UConn despite a huge gap in talent. That alone tells us that recruiting was for from the only thing that was seriously out of whack. The same could be said of Monmouth.
 

Online statistics

Members online
257
Guests online
2,090
Total visitors
2,347

Forum statistics

Threads
157,236
Messages
4,089,363
Members
9,982
Latest member
dogsdogsdog
Top Bottom