What are you binge watching? | Page 59 | The Boneyard

What are you binge watching?

Waquoit said:
FYI, my annual subscription is coming due so I was checking my credit cards for any offers as I've seen them in the past. The only decent one was from Amex offering $11.99 off for 3 months. So I cancel my annual subscription and I get a "Hate to see you go, how about 50% off?" I say sure, so now it's $4 a month. So if you get it, don't reup without cancelling first. It's worth it to me for the soccer alone.
Expand ...

If you have Instacart you get paramount free.
 
Wasted a few hours yesterday watching an HBO documentary series on Stax Records.

I know there are a few on here who are even more into music than I am. I highly recommend this to



Soulsville USA
 
Waquoit said:
FYI, my annual subscription is coming due so I was checking my credit cards for any offers as I've seen them in the past. The only decent one was from Amex offering $11.99 off for 3 months. So I cancel my annual subscription and I get a "Hate to see you go, how about 50% off?" I say sure, so now it's $4 a month. So if you get it, don't reup without cancelling first. It's worth it to me for the soccer alone.
Expand ...
I subscribed for a single month this Spring to watch 'Tulsa King'. I thought it was great.

I sampled each of the Taylor Sheridan 'Western' series/spinoffs but had difficulty making it through two episodes of any of 'em. Far, far too cookie cutter for my taste....and as far as 1923 was concerned I was extremely disappointed in both Harrison Ford and Cate Blanchett. Felt like they mailed in those performances.

'Mayor of Kingstown' I think I got through one episode and my thought was 'this is a complete and utter waste of Jeremy Renner'.
 
ZooCougar said:
I looked it up to refresh. The ending is just ‘80s Walk Street absurdity, It fits with all the crazy characters that were in the headlines back then, Sharpton, Trump, Goetz, Imus, Stern, the ‘86 Mets…

Wolfe has a way of capturing different places, the people and the environment.

He nailed the new south in “A Man in Full”. And even in one of his weakest novels “I Am Charlotte Simmons” he nailed the elite southern college experience.

I actually read A Man in Full at night on a cot in Iraq in 2003. I was pretty easily entertained. I even read two Dune prequels which are critically panned. So the bar was pretty low.
Expand ...

Wolfe was amazing at capturing the essence of an era, and he wrote incredible characters. If you remember from the books, he could write an interesting small character with depth in two paragraphs, and that character could come back 50 pages later and still have its own voice.

Unfortunately, his plots seemed to spiral in his fiction books. Netflix's "A Man in Full" was a mess at the end, and it was still a huge improvement over the book's ridiculous ending.
 
Mowed through all six episodes of Tires, the Shane Gillis sitcom on Netflix. 25 minutes an episode. It goes quick. It’s super stupid in plot. Super cheap in production. But I laughed out loud at stupid dude humor a couple times an episode for sure. Mostly all at the hands of Gillis himself, obviously. Worth the quick mindless watch.
 
.-.
Deepster said:
Mowed through all six episodes of Tires, the Shane Gillis sitcom on Netflix. 25 minutes an episode. It goes quick. It’s super stupid in plot. Super cheap in production. But I laughed out loud at stupid dude humor a couple times an episode for sure. Mostly all at the hands of Gillis himself, obviously. Worth the quick mindless watch.
Expand ...
It definitely is stupid, but it's watchable mainly due to Gillis.

I do think the Gilly and Keeves skits are funnier than Tires. If you haven't yet seen "Only Fans Dad", do it now.
 
Aluminny69 said:
I liked BODKIN on Netflix.
Expand ...
I actually watched 5.5 episodes and gave up because I just didn't care about the plot or any of the characters anymore. Waste of time in my opinion.
 
HuskyHawk said:
We decided to rewatch Outer Range season 1 to make sure the nuances of season 2 make sense. I can see things I missed already.
Expand ...
I debated doing same, but decided not to. I believe it probably doesn't matter as now on s2 e4 and it just keeps getting weirder. I've lost the ability to keep track of what year everyone's in and what year they came from.

One thing that I do know... Bill Pullman's kid is basically Bill Pullman in every way.
 
I picked up Welcome to Wrexham season 3. This show is just really well done. Across one episode they wove in a tragic story of a played pulled off the field as his pregnant wife was in the hospital with severe pre-eclampsia. Emergency C-section and he faces losing both as she's in ICU and the very premature baby in NICU. Meanwhile there's a 100 year old fan sharing his experiences through the years. So they want to honor him in the stadium pre-match. Unrelated except that as he's walking out he's greeted by the now healthy wife holding the baby. It packed a real emotional punch but was subtly done.

Real people's real stories are just more compelling than fake TV. The show is just bursting with them.
 
.-.
Binged "The Veil" (Hulu). Got mixed reviews but I found it mostly a compelling story and well acted, at least till the sixth and final episode, which got mired is some bizarre stuff which could've easily been cut w/o affecting the story. The always interesting Elisabeth Moss is great, the woman playing her frenemy was believable, and I always enjoy what Josh Charles brings to whatever he's in. Found it an enjoyable watch, although it could've used more editing in the finale.
 
I finished season two of Reacher. I liked it, but I have a few quibbles about it. I am not a fan of the tendency of TV writers to decide to rewrite source material unnecessarily. In this case they decided to add the angry detective sub narrative. It's reasonably well done but a cliché.

Also, at the end of the book there is a touching scene (pun notintended, but recognized) where Neagley briefly reaches out and touches Reacher. It is well established by that time (Bad Luck and Trouble is book 11 in the Reacher series, more on that later) that Neagley does not like physical contact with other people, presumedly because of some trauma in her past. Her pushing past that to touch and hold that touch with Reacher is a tremendously poignant moment in the book that speaks to her own issues and her affection for Reacher. Moving that moment to the TV writer created detective was an OK TV moment (though it felt a little contrived to me) but it lacked the power of that moment in the novel and misses the way that touch helps define in expand upon the relationship between Reacher and Neagley, particularly coming after the Karla Dixon affair.

I felt that using Bad Luck and Trouble as the second season of the TV show was a mistake. As noted above, it is the 11th book in the series. By that time, Reacher is a well established character and adding his former 110th team expands what we know about him. in the TV version, it almost seem to take away his uniqueness. Instead there was a whole bunch of mini Reachers.

Also, the storyline that the 110th Special Investigations Unit existed briefly and was disbanded is different than the novels universe. Remember the movie Never go Back? Well, reacher is going back to the 110th. One of the funny subplots in the Reacher series Is the question of how he lost command of the 110th. We know that the answer involves a dent in his desk. In the book Never go Back we find out that the dent was created by Reacher slamming his CO's head against it. Waiting for that scene at the end of season two, but instead we got the "Party scene."

I could go through more stuff but this post is already way too long. I will say that the violence in the novels, and there's an awful lot of it, never seems contrived, mean spirited, or sadistic. It's always either necessary to advance a goal or justified pursuant to Reachers moral code. in the TV series it just seems to exist for its own sake. They did a better job with that in season one.

All that said, I enjoyed season two, but as a fan of the novel series, I wish the writers would stay closer to the source material.
 
CL82 said:
I finished season two of Reacher. I liked it, but I have a few quibbles about it. I am not a fan of the tendency of TV writers to decide to rewrite source material unnecessarily. In this case they decided to add the angry detective sub narrative. It's reasonably well done but a cliché.

Also, at the end of the book there is a touching scene (pun notintended, but recognized) where Neagley briefly reaches out and touches Reacher. It is well established by that time (Bad Luck and Trouble is book 11 in the Reacher series, more on that later) that Neagley does not like physical contact with other people, presumedly because of some trauma in her past. Her pushing past that to touch and hold that touch with Reacher is a tremendously poignant moment in the book that speaks to her own issues and her affection for Reacher. Moving that moment to the TV writer created detective was an OK TV moment (though it felt a little contrived to me) but it lacked the power of that moment in the novel and misses the way that touch helps define in expand upon the relationship between Reacher and Neagley, particularly coming after the Karla Dixon affair.

I felt that using Bad Luck and Trouble as the second season of the TV show was a mistake. As noted above, it is the 11th book in the series. By that time, Reacher is a well established character and adding his former 110th team expands what we know about him. in the TV version, it almost seem to take away his uniqueness. Instead there was a whole bunch of mini Reachers.

Also, the storyline that the 110th Special Investigations Unit existed briefly and was disbanded is different than the novels universe. Remember the movie Never go Back? Well, reacher is going back to the 110th. One of the funny subplots in the Reacher series Is the question of how he lost command of the 110th. We know that the answer involves a dent in his desk. In the book Never go Back we find out that the dent was created by Reacher slamming his CO's head against it. Waiting for that scene at the end of season two, but instead we got the "Party scene."

I could go through more stuff but this post is already way too long. I will say that the violence in the novels, and there's an awful lot of it, never seems contrived, mean spirited, or sadistic. It's always either necessary to advance a goal or justified pursuant to Reachers moral code. in the TV series it just seems to exist for its own sake. They did a better job with that in season one.

All that said, I enjoyed season two, but as a fan of the novel series, I wish the writers would stay closer to the source material.
Expand ...

Gave up on it. Huge drop off from S1.
 
Got a word of mouth recommendation for Hell on Wheels, which was on AMC but is now available on Prime and Freevee.

Pretty good so far. Definitely a show for grownups in that there are lots of shades of gray.
 
Started watching The Rings of Power on prime. I'm only a few episodes in, but so far, I like it.
 
.-.
College Softball and Baseball Tournaments.
 
Our HOA board recently hired a new cable provider for all homes. It's taken a little time to go filter thru all the channels.

Part of the package is PlutoTV. So we are watching the following:
The Outer Limits
Perry Mason
Star Trek - the original series. Has all the other ones.
Hawaii Five-0 with Jack Lord
Mission: Impossible
Have Gun-Will Travel
Rawhide
Wanted: Dead or Alive

Plus Pluto has a Sci-Fi section with all 38 Godzilla movies!!
 
"The Iron Claw" was decent but not great. Covered a lot of territory, there was some time dilation. I was disappointed there was very little time spent showing the 3 Von Erichs wrestling together. Of course it was depressing. What got me the most wasn't any of the individual deaths, it was at the end when all his brothers were gone and Kevin was watching his 2 boys playing together, the way he and his brothers used to. That was a great scene.

I've seen a bit of commentary about casting. The one big miss--well huge actually--was Ric Flair. I don't know who the actor was, but missed by miles.
 
Oops sorry, posted in wrong thread, too late to delete.
 
.-.
Kolumbo said:
Justified
I am cruising through and almost done with season 3 of 6. I find it very entertaining. Great actors and the storyline in Season 3 is very interesting.
Expand ...
Boyd Crowder is one of the all time great TV characters. Also, there is just something very appealing about Ava. She just does it for me. It also has one of the all time great opening scenes on that rooftop restaurant in Miami.
 
HuskyHawk said:
Boyd Crowder is one of the all time great TV characters. Also, there is just something very appealing about Ava. She just does it for me. It also has one of the all time great opening scenes on that rooftop restaurant in Miami.
Expand ...
Ava? I’m more into the ex Mrs Givens.

Consistent with my preference for Mary Ann versus Ginger.
 
NEforceUConn said:
Ava? I’m more into the ex Mrs Givens.

Consistent with my preference for Mary Ann versus Ginger.
Expand ...
Girl Why Dont We Have Both GIF
 
HuskyHawk said:
Boyd Crowder is one of the all time great TV characters. Also, there is just something very appealing about Ava. She just does it for me. It also has one of the all time great opening scenes on that rooftop restaurant in Miami.
Expand ...
Agree about Ava and the ex Mrs. Givens. There are also many other guest appearances which rank very highly.

This show is great and I am almost finished. Boyd Crowder is definitely one of the coolest characters. balls and brains.

Wynn Duffy (I will always think of Kirk on Dear John): “Oh, the one wonton among the tortillas?”
Boyd Crowder: “I would have said, ‘kimchi in the salsa.’”
Mr. Yun: "That's good."
because Boyd knows Mr. Yun is Korean
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,372
Messages
4,568,854
Members
10,474
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom