Adama also speaks 4 languages & is living somewhere away from family, friends, etc.Not really. Mali is a poor country in a way that it is tough for Americans to wrap their mind around. Sanogo playing professionally is "life-changing" for his entire family. Adama can't earn active NIL money like a Andre can especially after a national championship year.
Jackson can look at where he ends up and return to school, if he doesn't like what he sees. Sanogo is committed.
There are 4 year guys who have been successful. I just don’t know who the comparison for Andre is. Buddy averaged 25 his senior year. Reaves averaged 18. If you took Dre’s 3 years here & combine them, he’s averaged less than both those guys their senior seasonsAustin Reaves and Buddy Hield are two 4 year guys that come to mind who are thriving in the league now. I fervently believe Andre will have an incredibly successful career in the NBA whether he comes back to Storrs for a 4th season or not. I think he gets drafted late first or early 2nd(either year) and he’s got the character, makeup(identity?), and skill set that a young man needs in order to make it in one of the most prestigious organizations in world. A true captain and leader capable of galvanizing a locker room whether he comes back as a senior or starts his pro career off as a rookie in the NBA/NBA G-League.
Adama also speaks 4 languages & is living somewhere away from family, friends, etc.
Just a guess, but I would think if Adama went to play in an upper euro league, his transition off the court would be much easier than someone who has only resides in the New England area their whole life
Yep. If he gets drafted it’s because scouts love what he showed in the tournament (defense, rebounding, energy, passing, leading fast breaks) and are willing to pass up him not being able to score for now, with the idea that they can develop it in the league.So you think it would be a bad idea to bring him back and try to score because that’s not what he does but think he can play a 3 and d role in the nba? That seems like even less of what he’s good at.
Agreed, his game has a bit of PJ Tucker to it. I mean, PJ is averaging like 5 points per game on over 30 min a game and his team is still a game away from the conference finals. There is a place for a guy like Andre, but he has to really specialize in that role, get on the right team, & become an absolute stud at everything he already is really good at. If his main goal is making it to the NBA (or even playing professionally) I don’t really see what benefit it is for him to come back. His stock is what it is. Everywhere you look has him rated as a top 50 prospect, that ain’t bad at all! He can certainly get a two way deal or maybe even play himself into a guaranteed contract. If I was advising him, I’d tell him go. More to lose by coming back than gaining.There are 4 year guys who have been successful. I just don’t know who the comparison for Andre is. Buddy averaged 25 his senior year. Reaves averaged 18. If you took Dre’s 3 years here & combine them, he’s averaged less than both those guys their senior seasons
I love Andre and think he will/can carve a role out in the nba. He seems like a guy who could be a more wing oriented version of PJ Tucker (mentality, leadership, intangibles) with a ceiling of a late career Shawn Marion (10-13 ppg, 7’ish rebounds and defending the best wing player on opposing teams) He’ll definitely be a system guy where in the right one he could thrive. Without the threat to score though, I don’t think teams will play with the ball in his hands as much as we did
In my opinion the team drafting him will have to be intrigued by his ability with the ball in his hands as a facilitator on the offensive end. The team would be willing to work on his shooting but sees some value in his role until that comes. Because if they think we will draft him and turn him into a 3 and D guy, he won’t see an nba court for a minimum of 2 years because he can’t fulfill that role at all at this time.Yep. If he gets drafted it’s because scouts love what he showed in the tournament (defense, rebounding, energy, passing, leading fast breaks) and are willing to pass up him not being able to score for now, with the idea that they can develop it in the league.
The point was that for Andre to significantly improve his draft stock by becoming a scorer, he would need to be a hyper efficient scorer at 15+ PPG. I haven’t seen anything to suggest that he can, or wants to, do that. The NBA draft does not like seniors. It’s better to be a junior with more potential than a senior with a better overall game
Also looking back at my post I’m not sure why I said Duarte was a sophomore. Definitely was a senior lol
Ha. This is true. It really depends on so many factors.Andre’a decision fascinates me. I have no idea what’s right. He is an nba athlete with no offensive game. I am anxious as hell to see how this works out.
Jackson more versatile than Brown, who was a sit in the corner and a defended. Jackson can dribble and pass.Anyone remember Andre Robertson who played for OKC Thunder a few years back? I don't think hes in the NBA anymore but he had a good (but short) run. He is not a bad Jackson comparison. Great athlete, great defender, good size and poor shooter. Jackson is definitely more creative with the ball though an probably not as good of an individual defender.
For number 4 I don’t think he can hurt OR help himself. From your list which is a good one, he should probably go.Ha. This is true. It really depends on so many factors.
1. What is he likely to make
2. Can he return and improve that guarantee (means make more, but also adding a year as a non earner into account)
3. Any NIL ops as a UConn player that he can’t get as a pro?
4. Could he hurt himself with one more year?
5. Is the G League or deep bench Development > than ncaa development?
6. Is nba end of rotation enough money to offset college lifestyle?
He is such a swing player in this regard. We do know that he likes being at UConn and being a student, so that is a factor as well.!
With him not even being a threat to score, I don’t see him on offense having the ball in his hands as much as he did in college. Just a personal opinionJackson more versatile than Brown, who was a sit in the corner and a defended. Jackson can dribble and pass.
Jackson is Jayson Tatum in first three quarters last night. 3 pts, 9 rebound. 6 assists and great defense. Is that good enough?
Mattise Thybulle is the comp that comes to mind for me.There are 4 year guys who have been successful. I just don’t know who the comparison for Andre is. Buddy averaged 25 his senior year. Reaves averaged 18. If you took Dre’s 3 years here & combine them, he’s averaged less than both those guys their senior seasons
I love Andre and think he will/can carve a role out in the nba. He seems like a guy who could be a more wing oriented version of PJ Tucker (mentality, leadership, intangibles) with a ceiling of a late career Shawn Marion (10-13 ppg, 7’ish rebounds and defending the best wing player on opposing teams) He’ll definitely be a system guy where in the right one he could thrive. Without the threat to score though, I don’t think teams will play with the ball in his hands as much as we did
Makes-Attempts 198-592 | 3PT% 33.4 |
Much better playmaker than ThybulleMattise Thybulle is the comp that comes to mind for me.
6’5 Guard/Wing
Played 4 years at Washington
Drafted #20 overall in 2019
Four year stats at Washington
G 135 PTS 9.2 RB 3.1 AST 2.0
35.8% from 3 on 4 attempts per game
Matisse Thybulle College Stats | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Matisse Thybulle - Stats, Game Logs, Splits, and much morewww.sports-reference.com
NBA 3PT Shooting
Makes-Attempts
198-5923PT%
33.4
A playmaking Roberson is a good comp but another Thunder player he reminds me of is Josh Giddey.Anyone remember Andre Robertson who played for OKC Thunder a few years back? I don't think hes in the NBA anymore but he had a good (but short) run. He is not a bad Jackson comparison. Great athlete, great defender, good size and poor shooter. Jackson is definitely more creative with the ball though a probably not as good of an individual defender.
Mattise Thybulle is the comp that comes to mind for me.
6’5 Guard/Wing
Played 4 years at Washington
Drafted #20 overall in 2019
Four year stats at Washington
G 135 PTS 9.2 RB 3.1 AST 2.0
35.8% from 3 on 4 attempts per game
Matisse Thybulle College Stats | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Matisse Thybulle - Stats, Game Logs, Splits, and much morewww.sports-reference.com
NBA 3PT Shooting
Makes-Attempts
198-5923PT%
33.4
For sure. I was looking at the Thybulle comp in an effort to provide another example of a 4-year player that was drafted top 20. Andre is a much, much better playmaker.Andre is a much, much worse shooter.
Andre is a much, much worse shooter.
He's a smaller version of Draymond Green who was picked in the 2nd round. Great IQ and court savvy and a little chippy . If someone works on his mechanics he can have a very nice careerReally, really difficult decision for any GM because his game is so unique. Like it says... he's basically the total package of an NBA wing, except he can't score at all. Elite defense, rebounding, passing, good handles for his size. Leadership... EVERYTHING, but this weird physical or mental hang-up keeping him from being able to score.
I think Andre needs to go. In the college environment, he doesn't have the level of coaching to develop that shot. There just isn't enough time allowed. He's had 3 years to do it with no appreciable change in his scoring ability. If it's going to happen, it's going to be with a 1:1 shooting coach that an NBA team can provide over a couple years in the G-League. If he's able to collect a half-way decent paycheck, he should. His stock is never going to be higher.
More svelte maybe but unrecognizably more athleticHe's a smaller version of Draymond Green who was picked in the 2nd round. Great IQ and court savvy and a little chippy . If someone works on his mechanics he can have a very nice career