- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Messages
- 1,577
- Reaction Score
- 3,730
Without debating Rebecca vs. Napheesa directly, is examining how a player from a one era might fit into another the point? Or should we look at the impact the player had when she was playing? Isn't that the thing we actually know vs. trying to assess a hypothetical using very limited information?
And if one's assessment is that players playing now are all better than the players playing in earlier eras, then building a Mount Rushmore becomes an exercise in futility since you'd always be replacing the honorees.
(And if UConn had junior or senior season Rebecca last year in addition to everyone else on the team, they win the national championship without a doubt.)
Also: women. They're all women.
I agree. Don't get me wrong. RL was the most important recruit. I remember het era and the era before. I'm telling u and it's no disrespect to RL but the kids on the whole are better. That being said RL was such a talent she could excel now and yes if we had a jr or SR year RL WE win it all last year.