I hope you didn’t go to UConn, since you seem to lack even basic reading skills.
I hope you didn’t go to UConn, since you seem to lack even basic reading skills.
Nowhere did I question why teams are moving, and in fact offered reasons why they probably are doing so.
Bull crap. You called me out and attributed something to me that was the opposite of my posts.Every thread with you becomes a food fight. I am not trying to get into a pissing match over this.
.
Bull crap. You called me out and attributed something to me that was the opposite of my posts.
You knew exactly what you were doing.
You are hilarious. You run around attacking and antagonizing everyone, often grossly misrepresenting their posts.You won't even let me back down. You just keep attacking.
Moving on.
I would make the the split at about 60 for both Football and basketball. With the money those schools make, they should be in a separate division.I agree with Nelson's sentiment that this is ridiculous. It's time for the top 200-250 schools to create a new Division 1-A above the current Division 1. At the same time, it's time for the top 90-100 football brands to create a new subdivision above FBS.
I do not have a sentiment on this. I actually want to know why the schools are doing this. I pointed out in the UMass thread that these schools can't all be wrong, and since they are on tight budgets, they do not have money to throw away. Why are they doing this? There must be a reason.
And after you’ve limited it to 60, which are going to be the 30 to have losing records? Few P5 schools outside of Vandy and Rutgers will tolerate that.I would make the the split at about 60 for both Football and basketball. With the money those schools make, they should be in a separate division.
Of course. Because it's located in the triangle created by Georgia, Alabama, Auburn.Given the way realignment has gone, I assume a power conference is already laying out plans to invite West Georgia ahead of UConn. It's become a tradition.
And after you’ve limited it to 60, which are going to be the 30 to have losing records? Few P5 schools outside of Vandy and Rutgers will tolerate that.
NFL teams are not dependent on alumni donations.With 32 teams in the NFL...there will be losing records in a zero sum game....how much is the NFL suffering ?
Go to a 16 team playoff and use the bowl sites as the play off games. 8,4,2,1. The bowls have become irrelevant, more and more players will opt out in future years.NFL teams are not dependent on alumni donations.
Nearly 70% of P5 teams go to bowl games. I can’t see folks being happy if that goes down to 50%.
With 32 teams in the NFL...there will be losing records in a zero sum game....how much is the NFL suffering ?
If they are locks for the NFL, wouldn't players still opt out of play off games?Go to a 16 team playoff and use the bowl sites as the play off games. 8,4,2,1. The bowls have become irrelevant, more and more players will opt out in future years.
Nobody cares if you opt out of a meaningless bowl game bc you don’t want to get hurt. But a playoff game? NFL scouts will view that very dimly.If they are locks for the NFL, wouldn't players still opt out of play off games?
Is the NFL considering contracting? Because you are arguing that college athletics will be just as possible if it contracted as it is now. Why shouldn’t every sport do that? Why doesn’t the NFL cut itself in half?
By that logic, why are the studios putting out so much different content? Just make a handful of shows, and make us all watch those?
Or maybe, that is not how any entertainment industry works.
40 teams would be enough. That would include all programs capable of regularly competing for a championship.I would make the the split at about 60 for both Football and basketball. With the money those schools make, they should be in a separate division.
It’s early in the season, but at this point Alabama’s success is getting roasted in the SEC Shorts videos.Outpulled Alabama-Texas game this year when the Longhorns upset the Tide.