Well | Page 8 | The Boneyard

Well

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
5,491
Reaction Score
18,050
I’m just not sure how we got around to blaming the sophomores for this year when they aren’t the leaders on this team and two of them aren’t even starters.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,393
Reaction Score
22,138
My two cents.

Most of the best rebounders and defensive players so far this year are sitting on the bench. Outside of Diarra, who is a good man defender on the starting lineup? The guards are getting driven past regularly and there is no elite shot blocker to meet the driver.

As for rebounding, Karaban and Johnson are averaging 5.4 and 5.2 rebounds per 40 minutes and they are the starting front court. That is not acceptable. Reed is averaging 17.7 and Stewart is averaging 8.7 rebounds per 40 minutes. In the Dayton game, UConn was outrebounded 41-25 (I don't remember that happening to a recent UConn team) and our two best rebounders played 21 minutes total. In 15 minutes of playing time, Reed was the high rebounder at 5.
 

Rico444

In the mix for six
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,764
Reaction Score
30,882
I did not say that at all. I say we are better off for wins if great players don’t leave early. I know you don’t get the different slant. Just don’t bitch about this year. If a one and done doesn’t make us better the one year they are here, explain why that makes you happy.

You've always been down on the one and done players, which is fine. I prefer a year like last to a year like this one, of course, but I don't have anything against a year like this where players are going to develop and set us up nicely for next year.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
1,550
Reaction Score
6,099
You've always been down on the one and done players, which is fine. I prefer a year like last to a year like this one, of course, but I don't have anything against a year like this where players are going to develop and set us up nicely for next year.
One and dones work when they are truly special and have good scaffolding around them. If we take a look at some of the teams that look like contenders right now, they’re generally winning with older guys (Auburn:Broome, Kansas, Gonzaga, ISU, even Kentucky).

This is a young team, will take patience and realistic expectations. We can spar about it in the meantime and have some fun with it without getting our dragon panties in a knot.

My biggest thing is just keeping the UConn brand elevated year over year to keep the shelves stocked with great players so we don’t lose the momentum that Hurley has built in this rapidly changing environment.
 

Orc

Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
414
Reaction Score
852
I’m just not sure how we got around to blaming the sophomores for this year when they aren’t the leaders on this team and two of them aren’t even starters.
Danny thought they would make huge leaps this year so he stuck with these guys. That appears to be a huge miss. He could’ve gotten any one he wanted from the portal.
 

cohenzone

Old Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,126
Reaction Score
23,332
You've always been down on the one and done players, which is fine. I prefer a year like last to a year like this one, of course, but I don't have anything against a year like this where players are going to develop and set us up nicely for next year.
That is the real issue. A stream of one and done does not by definition improve a program. It might make for an exciting player, but really good vets usually make a winner. And that is what attracts talent. As I said in another post, with NIL and the too loose transfer rule, make a change the has players sign a minimum 2 year deal. Pro sports do not have perpetual free agency.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
1,550
Reaction Score
6,099
That is the real issue. A stream of one and done does not by definition improve a program. It might make for an exciting player, but really good vets usually make a winner. And that is what attracts talent. As I said in another post, with NIL and the too loose transfer rule, make a change the has players sign a minimum 2 year deal. Pro sports do not have perpetual free agency.
Norlander said he caught up with Hurley after Colorado and asked him if he could have seen this team losing 2 in Maui and Hurley said yes. Take it for what it’s worth.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
11,203
Reaction Score
17,993
All the experts come from under their rocks!
They have been starving for awhile. Same ones who said Hurley's bullet proof comments during the tournament would provide bulletin board material.
 

August_West

Conscience do cost
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
51,393
Reaction Score
90,487
They missed big on Mahaney, and that caused a domino effect.

They will improve, the coaching staff is too good to stay this bad. I don't recall a UConn that was this poor on defense.
It’s this. This is what I’m seeing. It’s gotta be Nowell now in Mahaneys spot and take the lumps that will be coming while a frosh PG gets his feet under him. It won’t be perfect in the immediate ( but we suck anyway so take it) but we will be much better off in 2 months. Give Mahaney some off ball rotation time . Let him and Ross fight for minutes, as Ross isn’t there yet either. The other is Reed has to be a starter. SJ is a change of pace bench guy. Like he’s always been.
 

Rico444

In the mix for six
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,764
Reaction Score
30,882
That is the real issue. A stream of one and done does not by definition improve a program. It might make for an exciting player, but really good vets usually make a winner. And that is what attracts talent. As I said in another post, with NIL and the too loose transfer rule, make a change the has players sign a minimum 2 year deal. Pro sports do not have perpetual free agency.

I don't think it's as big a problem as you do. There are plenty of players that transfer because the role they were sold never ends up coming to fruition. In a lot of cases it's nobody's fault, but punishing the player and forcing them to burn 50% of their eligibility is too punitive.
 

cohenzone

Old Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,126
Reaction Score
23,332
I don't think it's as big a problem as you do. There are plenty of players that transfer because the role they were sold never ends up coming to fruition. In a lot of cases it's nobody's fault, but punishing the player and forcing them to burn 50% of their eligibility is too punitive.
Somehow players managed for 100 years. . But it does get to be silly. Memphis had at least 3 players at their 4th school.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
50,372
Reaction Score
177,626
One and dones work when they are truly special and have good scaffolding around them. If we take a look at some of the teams that look like contenders right now, they’re generally winning with older guys (Auburn:Broome, Kansas, Gonzaga, ISU, even Kentucky).

This is a young team, will take patience and realistic expectations. We can spar about it in the meantime and have some fun with it without getting our dragon panties in a knot.

My biggest thing is just keeping the UConn brand elevated year over year to keep the shelves stocked with great players so we don’t lose the momentum that Hurley has built in this rapidly changing environment.
This isn't a young team. Please stop saying it's a young team.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2018
Messages
136
Reaction Score
311
Big thing I’m noticing is lack of movement on offense. Too much standing around the 3 point with hands up . Help defense is slow and people constantly out of position, guards aren’t rebounding. In short, a total mess but fixable at this point now that the staff has seen them at game speed against decent competition.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
8,797
Reaction Score
59,370
Big thing I’m noticing is lack of movement on offense. Too much standing around the 3 point with hands up . Help defense is slow and people constantly out of position, guards aren’t rebounding. In short, a total mess but fixable at this point now that the staff has seen them at game speed against decent competition.
We’re moving on offense. We just don’t have a guy who can beat his guy off the dribble. Were too 3 ball dependent
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2018
Messages
136
Reaction Score
311
We’re moving on offense. We just don’t have a guy who can beat his guy off the dribble. Were too 3 ball dependent
That’s my point.. they’re moving to a spot and staying there too long.. allows D to close out on them, therefore taking a lousy shot .. we’re not that good of a shooting team to live by the three
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2022
Messages
589
Reaction Score
4,564
People need to relax, we won back to back nattys.

We're bound to regress in some fashion, I think we can turn it around but it will be grind.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,215
Reaction Score
9,808
This is a young team, will take patience and realistic expectations. We can spar about it in the meantime and have some fun with it without getting our dragon panties in a knot.
it’s really not that young. SJ is a Sr. Hass is 5th year. AK, reed & Mahaney are Jrs.

last year we started 2 5th years, a fr & 2soph
 

Online statistics

Members online
327
Guests online
2,305
Total visitors
2,632

Forum statistics

Threads
159,873
Messages
4,208,563
Members
10,077
Latest member
Mpjd2024


.
Top Bottom