Well, wow | The Boneyard

Well, wow

I don't care about Blue Bloods, most of those schools won before transfers and / or before segregation

We're blue collar, and the very best program in the country today

I laugh at those idiot rankings, brings a smile to me face
 
.-.
I mean it is a silly list based on who is in what tier anyway but unless I am forgetting something UConn beat every listed "Tier 1" team the last time they played them.
 
.-.
No sense in even getting into a debate or discussion because there isn’t one. If the detractions trip over themselves for looking stupid let them. No one actually believes this even fans of blue blood programs argue in our case.
 
BC Wyoming DePaul and Oregon State are def on par or better than Texas Tech, Baylor, Clemson, S Carolina, Iowa state, Miami, SDSU … excellent list we got here.
 
I have no words


It'd be worth looking into when that visual by Vinnie was created.

Look at placements for Syracuse, Notre Dame, Indiana, Georgetown, and Cincinnati - all too high.

Then look at Gonzaga, Purdue, Houston, Tennessee, Alabama - all too low.

That's out-dated compilation and a bogus reference point. It's as simple as that, and quite obvious.
 
.-.
I personally don’t mind if we’re seen as tier 2, but if we are, then it needs to be a much smaller tier with a handful of schools like Louisville, Florida, IU and maybe Michigan. There’s no way we’re level with Cuse, Cincinnati and some of the other schools in that second tier.
 
The blue blood term is just stupid in general because by definition it does mean programs who have been great and prominent since the early days of college basketball. Because of this though, it prevents programs like UConn or Florida from being in the discussion because our success has been recent. I wish we could just drop that stupid term altogether and just say "elite programs" or "greatest programs of all time".
 
.-.
Saying UConn isn't a blue blood is like saying Elon Musk isn't rich because he got all his money in the past 30 years.
 
The blue blood term is just stupid in general because by definition it does mean programs who have been great and prominent since the early days of college basketball. Because of this though, it prevents programs like UConn or Florida from being in the discussion because our success has been recent. I wish we could just drop that stupid term altogether and just say "elite programs" or "greatest programs of all time".
I'm partial to "powerhouses"
 
I have no words


I remember the year Uconn won the second of its back to back titles. The following day and for about a week after on all the sport news shows and a lot of the podcasts most of the coverage was about Caitlin Clark?!!! Well here we are and in the days since Michigan won theres podcast after podcast slurping away the wolverines and Dusty May as the greatest things since sliced bread. The funniest things ive heard and seen besides this tier list was one guy proclaiming Michigan is a blue blood and Uconn is a new blood. Another guy saying that Dusty May has now solidified himself as the best coach in the sport, Hist team being the best team of the last 25 years and yet another fool saying this is the beginning of the Michigan era although not exactly in those words. How soon they forget.
 
I have no words



This reminds me of a Facebook post I saw a couple days ago that showed a map with China inside a map of Florida. It said most people don't know that China is really a fraction the size of Florida.

The only purpose of the post was to get people to disagree and reply and increase their "brand" (I hate using that term).
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,363
Messages
4,567,866
Members
10,471
Latest member
EO2004


Top Bottom