UConnDan97
predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2012
- Messages
- 12,346
- Reaction Score
- 46,069
He also delivered blows (and stiff-arms) to anyone that tried to tackle him. If your argument is that DB = LM so be it. But it isn't a winning one. LM is a good back. But based on what came before him, he is a step down when we couldn't afford it considering that the rest of the team also took a step back. DB and others have carried the team on their backs. LM can't. I'm not blaming him for that. But the argument that he would have done the same as DB or others if only he had the same lines to run behind doesn't feel true to me. Can't prove it either way, but that's where I come out.
I don't disagree with what you wrote. Donald Brown is the better back in my opinion as well. But Donald Brown is playing on Sundays right now. It's okay to be thought of as less than Donald Brown.
But let's also recognize that it's not just the OLine that's different now (we had a couple back then who made it to Sundays as well ([Will Beatty at the Giants, Mike Ryan made a short stint at the Bengals, IIRC]). It's also the fact that we don't have a fullback (hell, we don't even use a fullback anymore!). Those guys were running behind the Shermanator (who is also playing on Sundays). Before that, they were running behind Deon Anderson (yet another guy who was playing on Sundays, and is now apparently winning MMA championships....who knew?).
So there was a lot more in place for those RBs than there are for any of the RBs in our stable today, and therefore it's not even fair to compare the sets of running backs from now and then...