Week 7 - NCAA Football | Page 5 | The Boneyard

Week 7 - NCAA Football

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
30,431
Reaction Score
58,275
Maybe research what committed means then come back with the list of "a whole lot of other schools" you're talking about.
Well in college athletics, committed usually is directly tied to money. For facilities, for coaching staff, and these days for NIL. In that regard, a lot of schools have funneled more money into their football programs than Boise St. ever did.

If you are referring to cultivating a fundamentally strong and winning culture, I'm not sure if committed is really the word I would use to describe that.

Anyway to me Boise St. football is a bit like Gonzaga men's hoops. An unlikely rise to prominence for 2 programs that are from the same corner of the country. Kind of a lightning in a bottle situation, not easily replicated.
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
954
Reaction Score
2,985
Well in college athletics, committed usually is directly tied to money. For facilities, for coaching staff, and these days for NIL. In that regard, a lot of schools have funneled more money into their football programs than Boise St. ever did.

If you are referring to cultivating a fundamentally strong and winning culture, I'm not sure if committed is really the word I would use to describe that.

Anyway to me Boise St. football is a bit like Gonzaga men's hoops. An unlikely rise to prominence for 2 programs that are from the same corner of the country. Kind of a lightning in a bottle situation, not easily replicated.
I feel you wanted a longer more nuanced answer. Being committed is all encompassing. It includes everything, every aspect of the program. With proper use of funds. But you see, I'm already bored and not committed to this conversation. For that reason, I'm out.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
17,675
Reaction Score
23,462
I don't really care about Ohio State but they were adversely affected by a penalty that Oregon had due to too many men on the field. They lost precious time as time ran off the clock.

They were talking about this on the Dan Patrick Show today and thought that this rule would be modified to put more time back on the clock for that type of scenario. Seems fair to me.
The problem with basketball and football in my opinion is that the clock has become too much of a focal point. I hate all these time-managing strategies. It seems to take away from just playing the game. Yes, time was wasted, but so many game decisions are designed around the clock anyway so it is what it is. I thought the 12-man thing may have been intentional and then I saw this:

 

KryHavok

Oh yes, UConn IS a BB blueblood!
Joined
Aug 25, 2023
Messages
752
Reaction Score
2,884
The problem with basketball and football in my opinion is that the clock has become too much of a focal point. I hate all these time-managing strategies. It seems to take away from just playing the game. Yes, time was wasted, but so many game decisions are designed around the clock anyway so it is what it is. I thought the 12-man thing may have been intentional and then I saw this:


Was watching the end of the game and couldn't keep up with the chaos. Looks the buckeyes literally got ducking screwed by Lanning's ploy...love it.
 

KryHavok

Oh yes, UConn IS a BB blueblood!
Joined
Aug 25, 2023
Messages
752
Reaction Score
2,884

Isn't it ironic that the rules committee is only looking at this now that the sacred cow Buckeyes lost a close game cuz they were too stupid to manage a clock properly? Like The Body used to say:
Capture.JPG

Now had this happened to, let's say...UConn, oh well, I'm sure the rules committee would probably say the rules were properly enforced and don't need changing.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,362
Reaction Score
54,827
Isn't it ironic that the rules committee is only looking at this now that the sacred cow Buckeyes lost a close game cuz they were too stupid to manage a clock properly? Like The Body used to say:

Now had this happened to, let's say...UConn, oh well, I'm sure the rules committee would probably say the rules were properly enforced and don't need changing.

They did not say the officials did anything wrong. (Because they didnt.)
It literally is a loophole -- legal but probably not intended. They're considering whether to close that loophole asap.
 

KryHavok

Oh yes, UConn IS a BB blueblood!
Joined
Aug 25, 2023
Messages
752
Reaction Score
2,884
Yeah, I know what they did was technically within the rules, but this is only getting traction cuz it occurred with such a high profile team. Were that loophole used against a lower G5 team, do you think the rules committee would act so swiftly, methinks no.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,362
Reaction Score
54,827
Yeah, I know what they did was technically within the rules, but this is only getting traction cuz it occurred with such a high profile team. Were that loophole used against a lower G5 team, do you think the rules committee would act so swiftly, methinks no.
Uhhh, if 10 million people were watching and it involved top 5 teams, yes.
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
20,912
Reaction Score
44,745
Yeah, I know what they did was technically within the rules, but this is only getting traction cuz it occurred with such a high profile team. Were that loophole used against a lower G5 team, do you think the rules committee would act so swiftly, methinks no.
I don't know about G5, but compared to Oregon and tOSU, I wouldn't have called Pitt or Wake Forest "high profile" when Pickett broke out the fake slide. That got closed down pronto.
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2013
Messages
4,279
Reaction Score
14,093
Missouri Valley clearly lays claim to the top conference in FCS, but I think Big Sky is pretty clearly #2.
Easily not even close. I know there's also talk of NDSU and SD moving up to FBS for the MW. I doubt anything came of it, but They're definitely good enough to make the jump. I go to ND and the NDSU fan base is rabid. They're pretty cool to hang out with too.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
91,951
Reaction Score
352,140
They did not say the officials did anything wrong. (Because they didnt.)
It literally is a loophole -- legal but probably not intended. They're considering whether to close that loophole asap.
 
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
2,522
Reaction Score
7,174
Lanning playing 4D chess.. use the loophole, then brag about it, so no one can in turn do it to you after you've exposed it.
Not sure why it took so long to close loophole. Rick Neuheisel talked about Arizona State using this loophole against UCLA. when Rick was at UCLA. This was years ago.

Obviously as others have stated it was due to a high-profile team (Ohio State) which was adversely affected by the loophole.

 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,472
Reaction Score
6,016
He didn't brag about it at the time... Coaches have used that (and other penalty timing related) loophole forever. It's Lanning bragging about it publicly that led to the change (he also did it much more obviously, as opposed to leaving any pretense it was "accidental")
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,362
Reaction Score
54,827
Obviously as others have stated it was due to a high-profile team (Ohio State) which was adversely affected by the loophole.

HIGH PROFILE GAME

Why is it shocking that a game watched by 10 million people and with loads of media attracts a lot of attention, gets greater scrutiny?
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2013
Messages
4,279
Reaction Score
14,093
He didn't brag about it at the time... Coaches have used that (and other penalty timing related) loophole forever. It's Lanning bragging about it publicly that led to the change (he also did it much more obviously, as opposed to leaving any pretense it was "accidental")
Doing against Ohio St didn't help either. They're one of those schools that get favored in rule making by the NCAA
 

Online statistics

Members online
311
Guests online
2,474
Total visitors
2,785

Forum statistics

Threads
159,735
Messages
4,202,343
Members
10,072
Latest member
CTEspn


.
Top Bottom