- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,583
- Reaction Score
- 18,754
Nate Oats with the used car salesman look
Would love to see Houston go down.Wichita State is giving Houston a game. Tied at 29 with 1 minute left in the first half
I think I jinxed itWould love to see Houston go down.

Yep, Rutgers up 70-60, with 1:15 left, and loses on a 3 at the buzzer 75-74.Pretty epic collapse from Rutgers with a Minnesota buzzer beating 3 to seal it.
I went up upstairs to fold clothes at that point. All of a sudden I hear a roar. I can’t believe 39 minutes of the game and missed the end.Up 10 with 1:15 left.
This final review is atrocious. He clearly got it up with like 0.4 left and at worst, the clock started 0.1 late. What on earth are they looking at for like 5 minutes?Yep, Rutgers up 70-60, with 1:15 left, and loses on a 3 at the buzzer 75-74.
Under final review as to the final clock start, but still..
Ruled a 3. Rutgers comes in second.Yep, Rutgers up 70-60, with 1:15 left, and loses on a 3 at the buzzer 75-74.
Under final review as to the final clock start, but still...
Minnesota had lost its previous 12 games.
I'm glad the call stood.This final review is atrocious. He clearly got it up with like 0.4 left and at worst, the clock started 0.1 late. What on earth are they looking at for like 5 minutes?
Epic collapse!
Good. Couldn’t happen to a more unlikable teamMichigan keeps moving further off the bubble.
And the Michigan guy airballed the totally open three to tie with 6 seconds left after Illinois had gone up 5 in the 2nd OT.Michigan had a 7-0 run in the last 2ish minutes of regulation to force OT
Illinois had a 7-0 run in the last 2ish minutes of OT to force 2OT
This is fun
I was saying the same thing. They showed the replay with a shot of the clock starting as soon as the player touched it and then the shot was clearly off on time. If we saw it so clearly within a minute why did the refs need 10 minutes to see the same thing?RU blows a ten point lead in the last 1:10 and suffers a devastating loss at MN.
The Gophers hit a three at the buzzer to win. The shot was clearly off on time
However, the refs watched reviews for 10 minuted or so looking to see if the shot clock started on time. Never seen anything like it before. For ten minutes they were looking for a reason to take away a game winning shot
It has to stop. They're out of control
Well, the replays certainly aren't "instant."That was absurd. End replay in all sports.
I've said this endless times - if you have to review replays for more than a couple minute - how can it then by definition be conclusive in the vast majority of cases?
Poverty conference where all of them play the same offense and never switch on screens.And the Michigan guy airballed the totally open three to tie with 6 seconds left after Illinois had gone up 5 in the 2nd OT.
I'm kind of disappointed that the Big "Ten" doesn't have a 10-way tie with 10-9 records, but 7 teams with 11-8 is pretty amazing.
Nice. Now, to make you feel really s____y, imagine if you had put 14.60 on it instead of 1.46.I just got dumb lucky View attachment 84595
Nice. Now, to make you feel really s____y, imagine if you had put 14.60 on it instead of 1.46.